TY - JOUR
T1 - Genotype-based clinical trials in cardiovascular disease
AU - Pereira, Naveen L.
AU - Sargent, Daniel J.
AU - Farkouh, Michael E.
AU - Rihal, Charanjit S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by Mayo Transplant Scholarly Award (N.L.P.), U01 GM61388 (The Pharmacogenetics Research Network). The TAILOR-PCI study is funded in part by the Mayo Clinic Centre for Individualized Medicine, and the Mayo Clinic Division of Cardiology. We thank Ms Luanne Wussow (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA) for her assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
PY - 2015/8/28
Y1 - 2015/8/28
N2 - Consensus practice guidelines and the implementation of clinical therapeutic advances are usually based on the results of large, randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, RCTs generally inform us on an average treatment effect for a presumably homogeneous population, but therapeutic interventions rarely benefit the entire population targeted. Indeed, multiple RCTs have demonstrated that interindividual variability exists both in drug response and in the development of adverse effects. The field of pharmacogenomics promises to deliver the right drug to the right patient. Substantial progress has been made in this field, with advances in technology, statistical and computational methods, and the use of cell and animal model systems. However, clinical implementation of pharmacogenetic principles has been difficult because RCTs demonstrating benefit are lacking. For patients, the potential benefits of performing such trials include the individualization of therapy to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects. These trials would also enable investigators to reduce sample size and hence contain costs for trial sponsors. Multiple ethical, legal, and practical issues need to be considered for the conduct of genotype-based RCTs. Whether pre-emptive genotyping embedded in electronic health records will preclude the need for performing genotype-based RCTs remains to be seen.
AB - Consensus practice guidelines and the implementation of clinical therapeutic advances are usually based on the results of large, randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, RCTs generally inform us on an average treatment effect for a presumably homogeneous population, but therapeutic interventions rarely benefit the entire population targeted. Indeed, multiple RCTs have demonstrated that interindividual variability exists both in drug response and in the development of adverse effects. The field of pharmacogenomics promises to deliver the right drug to the right patient. Substantial progress has been made in this field, with advances in technology, statistical and computational methods, and the use of cell and animal model systems. However, clinical implementation of pharmacogenetic principles has been difficult because RCTs demonstrating benefit are lacking. For patients, the potential benefits of performing such trials include the individualization of therapy to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects. These trials would also enable investigators to reduce sample size and hence contain costs for trial sponsors. Multiple ethical, legal, and practical issues need to be considered for the conduct of genotype-based RCTs. Whether pre-emptive genotyping embedded in electronic health records will preclude the need for performing genotype-based RCTs remains to be seen.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938202449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938202449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.64
DO - 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.64
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25940926
AN - SCOPUS:84938202449
SN - 1759-5002
VL - 12
SP - 475
EP - 487
JO - Nature Reviews Cardiology
JF - Nature Reviews Cardiology
IS - 8
ER -