Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium: Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes

Ken Silver, Gary Kukulka, John Gorniewicz, Kathleen Rayman, Richard R Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We sought to gain insight into workers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes on the subject of testing for genetic susceptibility to beryllium. Methods: Five focus groups were held with 30 current and former beryllium workers and nine family members. Audio recordings were transcribed and assessed by hierarchical coding using an inductive approach. Results: Some workers were unclear about the distinction between genotoxicity and heritability. A key finding is that they perceived the benefits of a positive test result to be related to enhanced autonomous decision-making. The major concern cited by participants was potential abuse of genetic information by employers. Complete financial separation of a prospective testing entity from the employer was seen as crucial. Conclusions: A window of opportunity exists to create regional partnerships for translational research on genetic susceptibility testing. Such partnerships would involve labor, management, public health scientists, primary care professionals, and other stakeholders. They would be critical to identifying testing strategies that maximize worker autonomy along with the public health advantages of genetic testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-532
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume54
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Beryllium
Genetic Testing
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Public Health
Translational Medical Research
Focus Groups
Primary Health Care
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Beryllium
  • Department of Energy
  • Genetic testing
  • Los Alamos
  • Oak Ridge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium : Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. / Silver, Ken; Kukulka, Gary; Gorniewicz, John; Rayman, Kathleen; Sharp, Richard R.

In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 54, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 521-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Silver, Ken ; Kukulka, Gary ; Gorniewicz, John ; Rayman, Kathleen ; Sharp, Richard R. / Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium : Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 54, No. 7. pp. 521-532.
@article{834fe616ba1745d681be6171bc689513,
title = "Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium: Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes",
abstract = "Background: We sought to gain insight into workers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes on the subject of testing for genetic susceptibility to beryllium. Methods: Five focus groups were held with 30 current and former beryllium workers and nine family members. Audio recordings were transcribed and assessed by hierarchical coding using an inductive approach. Results: Some workers were unclear about the distinction between genotoxicity and heritability. A key finding is that they perceived the benefits of a positive test result to be related to enhanced autonomous decision-making. The major concern cited by participants was potential abuse of genetic information by employers. Complete financial separation of a prospective testing entity from the employer was seen as crucial. Conclusions: A window of opportunity exists to create regional partnerships for translational research on genetic susceptibility testing. Such partnerships would involve labor, management, public health scientists, primary care professionals, and other stakeholders. They would be critical to identifying testing strategies that maximize worker autonomy along with the public health advantages of genetic testing.",
keywords = "Beryllium, Department of Energy, Genetic testing, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge",
author = "Ken Silver and Gary Kukulka and John Gorniewicz and Kathleen Rayman and Sharp, {Richard R}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/ajim.20962",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "521--532",
journal = "American Journal of Industrial Medicine",
issn = "0271-3586",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic susceptibility testing for beryllium

T2 - Worker knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes

AU - Silver, Ken

AU - Kukulka, Gary

AU - Gorniewicz, John

AU - Rayman, Kathleen

AU - Sharp, Richard R

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Background: We sought to gain insight into workers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes on the subject of testing for genetic susceptibility to beryllium. Methods: Five focus groups were held with 30 current and former beryllium workers and nine family members. Audio recordings were transcribed and assessed by hierarchical coding using an inductive approach. Results: Some workers were unclear about the distinction between genotoxicity and heritability. A key finding is that they perceived the benefits of a positive test result to be related to enhanced autonomous decision-making. The major concern cited by participants was potential abuse of genetic information by employers. Complete financial separation of a prospective testing entity from the employer was seen as crucial. Conclusions: A window of opportunity exists to create regional partnerships for translational research on genetic susceptibility testing. Such partnerships would involve labor, management, public health scientists, primary care professionals, and other stakeholders. They would be critical to identifying testing strategies that maximize worker autonomy along with the public health advantages of genetic testing.

AB - Background: We sought to gain insight into workers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes on the subject of testing for genetic susceptibility to beryllium. Methods: Five focus groups were held with 30 current and former beryllium workers and nine family members. Audio recordings were transcribed and assessed by hierarchical coding using an inductive approach. Results: Some workers were unclear about the distinction between genotoxicity and heritability. A key finding is that they perceived the benefits of a positive test result to be related to enhanced autonomous decision-making. The major concern cited by participants was potential abuse of genetic information by employers. Complete financial separation of a prospective testing entity from the employer was seen as crucial. Conclusions: A window of opportunity exists to create regional partnerships for translational research on genetic susceptibility testing. Such partnerships would involve labor, management, public health scientists, primary care professionals, and other stakeholders. They would be critical to identifying testing strategies that maximize worker autonomy along with the public health advantages of genetic testing.

KW - Beryllium

KW - Department of Energy

KW - Genetic testing

KW - Los Alamos

KW - Oak Ridge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957832134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957832134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajim.20962

DO - 10.1002/ajim.20962

M3 - Article

C2 - 21557280

AN - SCOPUS:79957832134

VL - 54

SP - 521

EP - 532

JO - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

JF - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

SN - 0271-3586

IS - 7

ER -