Gene modification therapies: views of parents of people with Down syndrome

Marsha Michie, Megan Allyse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: In considering gene modification technologies, the priorities of patient communities must be a central consideration. The purpose of this study is to assess views of families with Down syndrome (DS) regarding potential genome-based interventions. Methods: We constructed an anonymous online survey for family members of people with DS. Participants were asked to agree or disagree with scenarios describing hypothetical interventions to silence or significantly alter the physical and cognitive effects of a trisomy 21, and also with scenarios depicting currently available physical interventions. Results: All 532 respondents were parents of people with DS. For each of the five scenarios, over half said they would approve the intervention or would advise their children with DS to do so. Responses to hypothetical prenatal and pediatric cognitive interventions were significantly affected by participants’ assessments of the impact of DS on their children’s and their families’ lives, while physical and adult cognitive scenarios were not. Conclusion: Future interventions to address genetic conditions will impact patient communities and cannot succeed without their input and support. While many parents of people with DS indicated approval for hypothetical genetic therapies, these results indicate a need for continuing dialogue about benefits and drawbacks of gene modification technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-492
Number of pages6
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • CRISPR
  • Down syndrome
  • Gene editing
  • Gene silencing
  • Intellectual disability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gene modification therapies: views of parents of people with Down syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this