TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender, race, and health insurance status in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
AU - Patel, Nileshkumar
AU - Deshmukh, Abhishek
AU - Thakkar, Badal
AU - Coffey, James O.
AU - Agnihotri, Kanishk
AU - Patel, Achint
AU - Ainani, Nitesh
AU - Nalluri, Nikhil
AU - Patel, Nilay
AU - Patel, Nish
AU - Patel, Neil
AU - Badheka, Apurva O.
AU - Kowalski, Marcin
AU - Hendel, Robert
AU - Viles-Gonzalez, Juan
AU - Noseworthy, Peter A.
AU - Asirvatham, Samuel
AU - Lo, Kaming
AU - Myerburg, Robert J.
AU - Mitrani, Raul D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was conducted with support from the Miami Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (grant # 1UL1TR000460 from National Center for Advancing Translational Science , Miami, Florida). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Miami CTSI, The University of Miami, and its affiliated academic health care centers, or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has emerged as a popular procedure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there exist differences or disparities in ablation utilization across gender, socioeconomic class, insurance, or race. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2000 to 2012), we identified adults hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of AF by ICD 9 code 427.31 who had catheter ablation (ICD 9 code-37.34). We stratified patients by race, insurance status, age, gender, and hospital characteristics. A hierarchical multivariate mixed-effect model was created to identify the independent predictors of AF ablation. Among an estimated total of 3,508,122 patients (extrapolated from 20% Nationwide Inpatient Sample) hospitalized with a diagnosis of AF in the United States from the year 2000 to 2012, 102,469 patients (2.9%) underwent catheter ablations. The number of ablations was increased by 940%, from 1,439 in 2000 to 15,090 in 2012. There were significant differences according to gender, race, and health insurance status, which persisted even after adjustment for other risk factors. Female gender (0.83 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.87; p <0.001]), black (0.49 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.55; p <0.001]), and Hispanic race (0.64 [95% CI 0.56 to 0.72; p <0.001]) were associated with lower likelihoods of undergoing an AF ablation. Medicare (0.93, 0.88 to 0.98, <0.001) or Medicaid (0.67, 0.59 to 0.76, <0.001) coverage and uninsured patients (0.55, 0.49 to 0.62, <0.001) also had lower rates of AF ablation compared to patients with private insurance. In conclusion we found differences in utilization of catheter ablation for AF based on gender, race, and insurance status that persisted over time.
AB - Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has emerged as a popular procedure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there exist differences or disparities in ablation utilization across gender, socioeconomic class, insurance, or race. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2000 to 2012), we identified adults hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of AF by ICD 9 code 427.31 who had catheter ablation (ICD 9 code-37.34). We stratified patients by race, insurance status, age, gender, and hospital characteristics. A hierarchical multivariate mixed-effect model was created to identify the independent predictors of AF ablation. Among an estimated total of 3,508,122 patients (extrapolated from 20% Nationwide Inpatient Sample) hospitalized with a diagnosis of AF in the United States from the year 2000 to 2012, 102,469 patients (2.9%) underwent catheter ablations. The number of ablations was increased by 940%, from 1,439 in 2000 to 15,090 in 2012. There were significant differences according to gender, race, and health insurance status, which persisted even after adjustment for other risk factors. Female gender (0.83 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.87; p <0.001]), black (0.49 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.55; p <0.001]), and Hispanic race (0.64 [95% CI 0.56 to 0.72; p <0.001]) were associated with lower likelihoods of undergoing an AF ablation. Medicare (0.93, 0.88 to 0.98, <0.001) or Medicaid (0.67, 0.59 to 0.76, <0.001) coverage and uninsured patients (0.55, 0.49 to 0.62, <0.001) also had lower rates of AF ablation compared to patients with private insurance. In conclusion we found differences in utilization of catheter ablation for AF based on gender, race, and insurance status that persisted over time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958582169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958582169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.040
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 26899494
AN - SCOPUS:84958582169
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 117
SP - 1117
EP - 1126
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 7
ER -