Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort

M. Peggy Pazderka, Melissa Henderson, Susan Hallbeck

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the relationship among anthropometric dimensions, grip span, discomfort, gender, and grip strength. The 24 volunteer subjects (12 males, 12 females) performed five grips squeezing their hardest for 2 minutes at each of the five grip spans on the Jamar grip dynamometer. The grip strength was recorded using the UPC software and then averaged for each of the 30 second intervals. The data was analyzed using ANOVA, post-hoc (Tukey) hypothesis tests, and regression. In the ANOVA analysis gender, grip span, time, and the interactions of gender-grip span, grip span-time, and time-gender were determined to be the significant effects. In all four of the 30 second intervals, average grip strength was significantly higher for males than females. Female average grip strength was found to be 70% of male average grip strength. The post-hoc (Tukey) tests showed that grip spans 3,4, and 2 were significantly higher than grip spans 5 and 1. The anthropometry of several segments of the hand were found to be important predictors of grip strength and discomfort in the stepwise regressions. Grip span 4 had the highest average severity of discomfort, while grip span 1 had the most areas of the hand experiencing discomfort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
PublisherHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc.
Pages707-711
Number of pages5
Volume1
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1996 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Part 1 (of 2) - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Duration: Sep 2 1996Sep 6 1996

Other

OtherProceedings of the 1996 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Part 1 (of 2)
CityPhiladelphia, PA, USA
Period9/2/969/6/96

Fingerprint

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Anthropometry
Dynamometers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Pazderka, M. P., Henderson, M., & Hallbeck, S. (1996). Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (Vol. 1, pp. 707-711). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc..

Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort. / Pazderka, M. Peggy; Henderson, Melissa; Hallbeck, Susan.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Vol. 1 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc., 1996. p. 707-711.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Pazderka, MP, Henderson, M & Hallbeck, S 1996, Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. vol. 1, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc., pp. 707-711, Proceedings of the 1996 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Part 1 (of 2), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 9/2/96.
Pazderka MP, Henderson M, Hallbeck S. Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Vol. 1. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc. 1996. p. 707-711
Pazderka, M. Peggy ; Henderson, Melissa ; Hallbeck, Susan. / Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Vol. 1 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc., 1996. pp. 707-711
@inproceedings{37c102e5cafd4317af691dc52c220dfe,
title = "Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort",
abstract = "The objective of this study is to examine the relationship among anthropometric dimensions, grip span, discomfort, gender, and grip strength. The 24 volunteer subjects (12 males, 12 females) performed five grips squeezing their hardest for 2 minutes at each of the five grip spans on the Jamar grip dynamometer. The grip strength was recorded using the UPC software and then averaged for each of the 30 second intervals. The data was analyzed using ANOVA, post-hoc (Tukey) hypothesis tests, and regression. In the ANOVA analysis gender, grip span, time, and the interactions of gender-grip span, grip span-time, and time-gender were determined to be the significant effects. In all four of the 30 second intervals, average grip strength was significantly higher for males than females. Female average grip strength was found to be 70{\%} of male average grip strength. The post-hoc (Tukey) tests showed that grip spans 3,4, and 2 were significantly higher than grip spans 5 and 1. The anthropometry of several segments of the hand were found to be important predictors of grip strength and discomfort in the stepwise regressions. Grip span 4 had the highest average severity of discomfort, while grip span 1 had the most areas of the hand experiencing discomfort.",
author = "Pazderka, {M. Peggy} and Melissa Henderson and Susan Hallbeck",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "707--711",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",
publisher = "Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Gender, grip span, anthropometric dimensions, and time effects on grip strength and discomfort

AU - Pazderka, M. Peggy

AU - Henderson, Melissa

AU - Hallbeck, Susan

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The objective of this study is to examine the relationship among anthropometric dimensions, grip span, discomfort, gender, and grip strength. The 24 volunteer subjects (12 males, 12 females) performed five grips squeezing their hardest for 2 minutes at each of the five grip spans on the Jamar grip dynamometer. The grip strength was recorded using the UPC software and then averaged for each of the 30 second intervals. The data was analyzed using ANOVA, post-hoc (Tukey) hypothesis tests, and regression. In the ANOVA analysis gender, grip span, time, and the interactions of gender-grip span, grip span-time, and time-gender were determined to be the significant effects. In all four of the 30 second intervals, average grip strength was significantly higher for males than females. Female average grip strength was found to be 70% of male average grip strength. The post-hoc (Tukey) tests showed that grip spans 3,4, and 2 were significantly higher than grip spans 5 and 1. The anthropometry of several segments of the hand were found to be important predictors of grip strength and discomfort in the stepwise regressions. Grip span 4 had the highest average severity of discomfort, while grip span 1 had the most areas of the hand experiencing discomfort.

AB - The objective of this study is to examine the relationship among anthropometric dimensions, grip span, discomfort, gender, and grip strength. The 24 volunteer subjects (12 males, 12 females) performed five grips squeezing their hardest for 2 minutes at each of the five grip spans on the Jamar grip dynamometer. The grip strength was recorded using the UPC software and then averaged for each of the 30 second intervals. The data was analyzed using ANOVA, post-hoc (Tukey) hypothesis tests, and regression. In the ANOVA analysis gender, grip span, time, and the interactions of gender-grip span, grip span-time, and time-gender were determined to be the significant effects. In all four of the 30 second intervals, average grip strength was significantly higher for males than females. Female average grip strength was found to be 70% of male average grip strength. The post-hoc (Tukey) tests showed that grip spans 3,4, and 2 were significantly higher than grip spans 5 and 1. The anthropometry of several segments of the hand were found to be important predictors of grip strength and discomfort in the stepwise regressions. Grip span 4 had the highest average severity of discomfort, while grip span 1 had the most areas of the hand experiencing discomfort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029713893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029713893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0029713893

VL - 1

SP - 707

EP - 711

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

PB - Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc.

ER -