Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type

Anita P. Mayer, Janis E. Blair, Marcia G. Ko, Sharonne N. Hayes, Yu Hui H Chang, Suzanne L. Caubet, Julia A. Files

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past 30 years, the number and type of academic faculty tracks have increased, and researchers have found differences in promotion rates between track types. The authors studied the gender distribution of medical school faculty on the traditional tenure track (TTT) and clinician-educator track (CET) types. METHOD: The authors analyzed gender and academic track type distribution data from the March 31, 2011, snapshot of the Association of American Medical Colleges' Faculty Roster. Their final analysis included data from the 123 medical schools offering the TTT type and the 106 offering the CET type, which excluded any schools with 10 or fewer faculty on each track type. RESULTS: The original dataset included 134 medical schools representing 138,508 full-time faculty members, 50,376 (36%) of whom were women. Of the 134 medical schools, 128 reported at least one of four track types: TTT, CET, research track, and other. Of the 83 medical schools offering the CET type, 64 (77%) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. Of the 102 medical schools offering the TTT type, only 20 (20%) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools offering the CET type reported higher proportions of female faculty on that track type. Given that faculty on the CET type lag behind their TTT colleagues in academic promotion, these findings may contribute to continued challenges in gaining academic and leadership parity for women in academic medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-317
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Medical Faculties
Medical Schools
gender
educator
school
promotion
Parity
Research Personnel
Medicine
data analysis
medicine
leadership
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Mayer, A. P., Blair, J. E., Ko, M. G., Hayes, S. N., Chang, Y. H. H., Caubet, S. L., & Files, J. A. (2014). Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089

Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type. / Mayer, Anita P.; Blair, Janis E.; Ko, Marcia G.; Hayes, Sharonne N.; Chang, Yu Hui H; Caubet, Suzanne L.; Files, Julia A.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 89, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 312-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mayer, AP, Blair, JE, Ko, MG, Hayes, SN, Chang, YHH, Caubet, SL & Files, JA 2014, 'Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type', Academic Medicine, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089
Mayer AP, Blair JE, Ko MG, Hayes SN, Chang YHH, Caubet SL et al. Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type. Academic Medicine. 2014 Feb;89(2):312-317. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089
Mayer, Anita P. ; Blair, Janis E. ; Ko, Marcia G. ; Hayes, Sharonne N. ; Chang, Yu Hui H ; Caubet, Suzanne L. ; Files, Julia A. / Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type. In: Academic Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. 2. pp. 312-317.
@article{c2311c3736084a71884594c64bd5bd19,
title = "Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type",
abstract = "Purpose: Over the past 30 years, the number and type of academic faculty tracks have increased, and researchers have found differences in promotion rates between track types. The authors studied the gender distribution of medical school faculty on the traditional tenure track (TTT) and clinician-educator track (CET) types. METHOD: The authors analyzed gender and academic track type distribution data from the March 31, 2011, snapshot of the Association of American Medical Colleges' Faculty Roster. Their final analysis included data from the 123 medical schools offering the TTT type and the 106 offering the CET type, which excluded any schools with 10 or fewer faculty on each track type. RESULTS: The original dataset included 134 medical schools representing 138,508 full-time faculty members, 50,376 (36{\%}) of whom were women. Of the 134 medical schools, 128 reported at least one of four track types: TTT, CET, research track, and other. Of the 83 medical schools offering the CET type, 64 (77{\%}) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. Of the 102 medical schools offering the TTT type, only 20 (20{\%}) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools offering the CET type reported higher proportions of female faculty on that track type. Given that faculty on the CET type lag behind their TTT colleagues in academic promotion, these findings may contribute to continued challenges in gaining academic and leadership parity for women in academic medicine.",
author = "Mayer, {Anita P.} and Blair, {Janis E.} and Ko, {Marcia G.} and Hayes, {Sharonne N.} and Chang, {Yu Hui H} and Caubet, {Suzanne L.} and Files, {Julia A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "312--317",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender distribution of U.S. Medical school faculty by academic track type

AU - Mayer, Anita P.

AU - Blair, Janis E.

AU - Ko, Marcia G.

AU - Hayes, Sharonne N.

AU - Chang, Yu Hui H

AU - Caubet, Suzanne L.

AU - Files, Julia A.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Purpose: Over the past 30 years, the number and type of academic faculty tracks have increased, and researchers have found differences in promotion rates between track types. The authors studied the gender distribution of medical school faculty on the traditional tenure track (TTT) and clinician-educator track (CET) types. METHOD: The authors analyzed gender and academic track type distribution data from the March 31, 2011, snapshot of the Association of American Medical Colleges' Faculty Roster. Their final analysis included data from the 123 medical schools offering the TTT type and the 106 offering the CET type, which excluded any schools with 10 or fewer faculty on each track type. RESULTS: The original dataset included 134 medical schools representing 138,508 full-time faculty members, 50,376 (36%) of whom were women. Of the 134 medical schools, 128 reported at least one of four track types: TTT, CET, research track, and other. Of the 83 medical schools offering the CET type, 64 (77%) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. Of the 102 medical schools offering the TTT type, only 20 (20%) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools offering the CET type reported higher proportions of female faculty on that track type. Given that faculty on the CET type lag behind their TTT colleagues in academic promotion, these findings may contribute to continued challenges in gaining academic and leadership parity for women in academic medicine.

AB - Purpose: Over the past 30 years, the number and type of academic faculty tracks have increased, and researchers have found differences in promotion rates between track types. The authors studied the gender distribution of medical school faculty on the traditional tenure track (TTT) and clinician-educator track (CET) types. METHOD: The authors analyzed gender and academic track type distribution data from the March 31, 2011, snapshot of the Association of American Medical Colleges' Faculty Roster. Their final analysis included data from the 123 medical schools offering the TTT type and the 106 offering the CET type, which excluded any schools with 10 or fewer faculty on each track type. RESULTS: The original dataset included 134 medical schools representing 138,508 full-time faculty members, 50,376 (36%) of whom were women. Of the 134 medical schools, 128 reported at least one of four track types: TTT, CET, research track, and other. Of the 83 medical schools offering the CET type, 64 (77%) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. Of the 102 medical schools offering the TTT type, only 20 (20%) had a higher proportion of female than male faculty on that track type. CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools offering the CET type reported higher proportions of female faculty on that track type. Given that faculty on the CET type lag behind their TTT colleagues in academic promotion, these findings may contribute to continued challenges in gaining academic and leadership parity for women in academic medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894104491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894104491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089

M3 - Article

C2 - 24362384

AN - SCOPUS:84894104491

VL - 89

SP - 312

EP - 317

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 2

ER -