Gender difference in coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Hiro Kawata, Siva Mulpuru, Huy Phan, Jigar Patel, Varuna Gadiyaram, Lu Chen, Navinder Sawhney, Gregory Feld, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have suggested better outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women. Gender differences in coronary sinus (CS) anatomy and left ventricular (LV) lead parameters in patients undergoing CRT, however, have not been well studied. Methods and Results: Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients, undergoing CRT at the University of California in San Diego Medical Center from 2003 to 2011 were included in this study. The location of the LV lead was assessed on coronary venography and chest X-ray recorded at the time of device implantation. Optimal LV lead position was defined as either mid-lateral or posterolateral LV wall. The relationship between LV lead position (optimal or non-optimal position) and LV lead parameters at completion of implant were compared between genders. No statistically significant gender differences were noted in baseline characteristics. LV lead implantation was successful in 217 patients (97.3%). Lateral or posterolateral CS branches were unavailable in more women than men (26.3% vs. 10.8%, P=0.011). Women had a higher LV lead pacing threshold than men (P=0.003) and gender was an independent risk factor of high LV lead pacing threshold (P=0.008). Conclusions: Women had an anatomical disadvantage for LV lead placement and had higher LV lead pacing threshold compared to men. Implanting physicians should be aware of gender differences during LV lead placement in order to maximize CRT benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1424-1429
Number of pages6
JournalCirculation Journal
Volume77
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 31 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Coronary Sinus
Anatomy
Phlebography
Lead
Thorax
X-Rays
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Biventricular pacing
  • Coronary sinus vein
  • Gender
  • Left ventricular lead position
  • Pacing threshold

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Gender difference in coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. / Kawata, Hiro; Mulpuru, Siva; Phan, Huy; Patel, Jigar; Gadiyaram, Varuna; Chen, Lu; Sawhney, Navinder; Feld, Gregory; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika.

In: Circulation Journal, Vol. 77, No. 6, 31.05.2013, p. 1424-1429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kawata, H, Mulpuru, S, Phan, H, Patel, J, Gadiyaram, V, Chen, L, Sawhney, N, Feld, G & Birgersdotter-Green, U 2013, 'Gender difference in coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy', Circulation Journal, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1424-1429. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1402
Kawata, Hiro ; Mulpuru, Siva ; Phan, Huy ; Patel, Jigar ; Gadiyaram, Varuna ; Chen, Lu ; Sawhney, Navinder ; Feld, Gregory ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika. / Gender difference in coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. In: Circulation Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 77, No. 6. pp. 1424-1429.
@article{9820b30323984ba79593b87c49055649,
title = "Gender difference in coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy",
abstract = "Background: Recent studies have suggested better outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women. Gender differences in coronary sinus (CS) anatomy and left ventricular (LV) lead parameters in patients undergoing CRT, however, have not been well studied. Methods and Results: Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients, undergoing CRT at the University of California in San Diego Medical Center from 2003 to 2011 were included in this study. The location of the LV lead was assessed on coronary venography and chest X-ray recorded at the time of device implantation. Optimal LV lead position was defined as either mid-lateral or posterolateral LV wall. The relationship between LV lead position (optimal or non-optimal position) and LV lead parameters at completion of implant were compared between genders. No statistically significant gender differences were noted in baseline characteristics. LV lead implantation was successful in 217 patients (97.3{\%}). Lateral or posterolateral CS branches were unavailable in more women than men (26.3{\%} vs. 10.8{\%}, P=0.011). Women had a higher LV lead pacing threshold than men (P=0.003) and gender was an independent risk factor of high LV lead pacing threshold (P=0.008). Conclusions: Women had an anatomical disadvantage for LV lead placement and had higher LV lead pacing threshold compared to men. Implanting physicians should be aware of gender differences during LV lead placement in order to maximize CRT benefits.",
keywords = "Biventricular pacing, Coronary sinus vein, Gender, Left ventricular lead position, Pacing threshold",
author = "Hiro Kawata and Siva Mulpuru and Huy Phan and Jigar Patel and Varuna Gadiyaram and Lu Chen and Navinder Sawhney and Gregory Feld and Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1402",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "1424--1429",
journal = "Circulation Journal",
issn = "1346-9843",
publisher = "Japanese Circulation Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender difference in coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

AU - Kawata, Hiro

AU - Mulpuru, Siva

AU - Phan, Huy

AU - Patel, Jigar

AU - Gadiyaram, Varuna

AU - Chen, Lu

AU - Sawhney, Navinder

AU - Feld, Gregory

AU - Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika

PY - 2013/5/31

Y1 - 2013/5/31

N2 - Background: Recent studies have suggested better outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women. Gender differences in coronary sinus (CS) anatomy and left ventricular (LV) lead parameters in patients undergoing CRT, however, have not been well studied. Methods and Results: Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients, undergoing CRT at the University of California in San Diego Medical Center from 2003 to 2011 were included in this study. The location of the LV lead was assessed on coronary venography and chest X-ray recorded at the time of device implantation. Optimal LV lead position was defined as either mid-lateral or posterolateral LV wall. The relationship between LV lead position (optimal or non-optimal position) and LV lead parameters at completion of implant were compared between genders. No statistically significant gender differences were noted in baseline characteristics. LV lead implantation was successful in 217 patients (97.3%). Lateral or posterolateral CS branches were unavailable in more women than men (26.3% vs. 10.8%, P=0.011). Women had a higher LV lead pacing threshold than men (P=0.003) and gender was an independent risk factor of high LV lead pacing threshold (P=0.008). Conclusions: Women had an anatomical disadvantage for LV lead placement and had higher LV lead pacing threshold compared to men. Implanting physicians should be aware of gender differences during LV lead placement in order to maximize CRT benefits.

AB - Background: Recent studies have suggested better outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women. Gender differences in coronary sinus (CS) anatomy and left ventricular (LV) lead parameters in patients undergoing CRT, however, have not been well studied. Methods and Results: Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients, undergoing CRT at the University of California in San Diego Medical Center from 2003 to 2011 were included in this study. The location of the LV lead was assessed on coronary venography and chest X-ray recorded at the time of device implantation. Optimal LV lead position was defined as either mid-lateral or posterolateral LV wall. The relationship between LV lead position (optimal or non-optimal position) and LV lead parameters at completion of implant were compared between genders. No statistically significant gender differences were noted in baseline characteristics. LV lead implantation was successful in 217 patients (97.3%). Lateral or posterolateral CS branches were unavailable in more women than men (26.3% vs. 10.8%, P=0.011). Women had a higher LV lead pacing threshold than men (P=0.003) and gender was an independent risk factor of high LV lead pacing threshold (P=0.008). Conclusions: Women had an anatomical disadvantage for LV lead placement and had higher LV lead pacing threshold compared to men. Implanting physicians should be aware of gender differences during LV lead placement in order to maximize CRT benefits.

KW - Biventricular pacing

KW - Coronary sinus vein

KW - Gender

KW - Left ventricular lead position

KW - Pacing threshold

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878263345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878263345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1402

DO - 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1402

M3 - Article

C2 - 23459446

AN - SCOPUS:84878263345

VL - 77

SP - 1424

EP - 1429

JO - Circulation Journal

JF - Circulation Journal

SN - 1346-9843

IS - 6

ER -