Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes

Jakub Dobruch, Siamak Daneshmand, Margit Fisch, Yair Lotan, Aidan P. Noon, Matthew J. Resnick, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Alexandre R. Zlotta, Stephen A. Boorjian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

163 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context The incidence of bladder cancer is three to four times greater in men than in women. However, women are diagnosed with more advanced disease at presentation and have less favorable outcomes after treatment. Objective To review the literature on potential biologic mechanisms underlying differential gender risk for bladder cancer, and evidence regarding gender disparities in bladder cancer presentation, management, and outcomes. Evidence acquisition A literature search of English-language publications that included an analysis of the association of gender with bladder cancer was performed using Pubmed. Ninety-seven articles were selected for analysis with the consensus of all authors. Evidence synthesis It has been shown that the gender difference in bladder cancer incidence is independent of differences in exposure risk, including smoking status. Potential molecular mechanisms include disparate metabolism of carcinogens by hepatic enzymes between men and women, resulting in differential exposure of the urothelium to carcinogens. In addition, the activity of the sex steroid hormone pathway may play a role in bladder cancer development, with demonstration that both androgens and estrogens have biologic effects in bladder cancer in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, gender differences exist in the timeliness and completeness of hematuria evaluation, with women experiencing a significantly greater delay in urologic referral and undergoing guideline-concordant imaging less frequently. Correspondingly, women have more advanced tumors at the time of bladder cancer diagnosis. Interestingly, higher cancer-specific mortality has been noted among women even after adjusting for tumor stage and treatment modality. Conclusions Numerous potential biologic and epidemiologic factors probably underlie the gender differences observed for bladder cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and outcomes. Continued evaluation to define clinical applications for manipulation of the sex steroid pathway and to improve the standardization of hematuria evaluation in women may improve future patient outcomes and reduce these disparities. Patient summary We describe the scientific basis and clinical evidence to explain the greater incidence of bladder cancer in men and the adverse presentation and outcomes for this disease in women. We identify goals for improving patient survival and reducing gender disparities in bladder cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)300-310
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Keywords

  • Androgen receptor
  • Bladder cancer
  • Estrogen receptor
  • Gender
  • Radical cystectomy
  • Urothelial carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Dobruch, J., Daneshmand, S., Fisch, M., Lotan, Y., Noon, A. P., Resnick, M. J., Shariat, S. F., Zlotta, A. R., & Boorjian, S. A. (2016). Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes. European Urology, 69(2), 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.037