TY - JOUR
T1 - Gaps and opportunities in the treatment of relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma
T2 - Consensus recommendations of the NCI Multiple Myeloma Steering Committee
AU - Kumar, Shaji
AU - Baizer, Lawrence
AU - Callander, Natalie S.
AU - Giralt, Sergio A.
AU - Hillengass, Jens
AU - Freidlin, Boris
AU - Hoering, Antje
AU - Richardson, Paul G.
AU - Schwartz, Elena I.
AU - Reiman, Anthony
AU - Lentzsch, Suzanne
AU - McCarthy, Philip L.
AU - Jagannath, Sundar
AU - Yee, Andrew J.
AU - Little, Richard F.
AU - Raje, Noopur S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Funding Information:
SAG receives research funding from Miltenyi Biotec, Takeda, Celgene, Amgen, Sanofi, Johnson and Johnson and Actinium and is on the advisory boards for: Kite, Celgene, Sanofi, Novartis, Johnson and Johnson, Amgen, Takeda, Jazz, and Actinium. JH reports receiving honoraria from Curio Science, Amgen, AdBoards, GSK, Axxess Network, IntelliSphere and Janssen. SJ has served as a consultant for BMS, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Sanofi and Takeda. SK reports research funding to Mayo from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Carsgen, Janssen, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Roche-Genentech, Takeda, Tenebio and Molecular Templates. He has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche-Genentech, Takeda, Astra-Zeneca, Bluebird Bio, Epizyme, Secura Biotherapeutics, Monterosa therapeutics, Trillium and Oncopeptides. SL has served as a speaker for PerView, Clinical Care Options and RedMed, as a consultant for Caelum Bioscience, Pfizer, Takeda, Natara, Janssen, Celularity, Abbvie, GSK, Takeda, Karyopharm, Sanofi and Oncopetide, owns stock in Caelum Bioscience, Magenta and Poseida and has received research funding from Karyopharm and Sanofi. NSR has served as a consultant for BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen. Takeda, Abbvie and Sanofi, on the scientific advisory board for Caribou Bioscience and Immuneel and has received research funding from Bluebird Bio. PGR has received payments/honoraria from Oncopeptides, Celgene/BMS, Takeda, Karyopharm, Janssen, Sanofi, Secura Bio, GSK, Regeneron, AstraZeneca and Protocol Intelligence and reports interests in Oncopeptides, Celgene/BMS, Takeda and Karyopharm. AJY has served as a consultant for Adaptive, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda. LB, NSC, BF, AH, RFL, PLM, AR, and EIS declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - A wide variety of new therapeutic options for Multiple Myeloma (MM) have recently become available, extending progression-free and overall survival for patients in meaningful ways. However, these treatments are not curative, and patients eventually relapse, necessitating decisions on the appropriate choice of treatment(s) for the next phase of the disease. Additionally, an important subset of MM patients will prove to be refractory to the majority of the available treatments, requiring selection of effective therapies from the remaining options. Immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and alkylating agents are the major classes of MM therapies, with several options in each class. Patients who are refractory to one agent in a class may be responsive to a related compound or to a drug from a different class. However, rules for selection of alternative treatments in these situations are somewhat empirical and later phase clinical trials to inform those choices are ongoing. To address these issues the NCI Multiple Myeloma Steering Committee formed a relapsed/refractory working group to review optimal treatment choices, timing, and sequencing and provide recommendations. Additional issues considered include the role of salvage autologous stem cell transplantation, risk stratification, targeted approaches for genetic subsets of MM, appropriate clinical trial endpoints, and promising investigational agents. This report summarizes the deliberations of the working group and suggests potential avenues of research to improve the precision, timing, and durability of treatments for Myeloma.
AB - A wide variety of new therapeutic options for Multiple Myeloma (MM) have recently become available, extending progression-free and overall survival for patients in meaningful ways. However, these treatments are not curative, and patients eventually relapse, necessitating decisions on the appropriate choice of treatment(s) for the next phase of the disease. Additionally, an important subset of MM patients will prove to be refractory to the majority of the available treatments, requiring selection of effective therapies from the remaining options. Immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and alkylating agents are the major classes of MM therapies, with several options in each class. Patients who are refractory to one agent in a class may be responsive to a related compound or to a drug from a different class. However, rules for selection of alternative treatments in these situations are somewhat empirical and later phase clinical trials to inform those choices are ongoing. To address these issues the NCI Multiple Myeloma Steering Committee formed a relapsed/refractory working group to review optimal treatment choices, timing, and sequencing and provide recommendations. Additional issues considered include the role of salvage autologous stem cell transplantation, risk stratification, targeted approaches for genetic subsets of MM, appropriate clinical trial endpoints, and promising investigational agents. This report summarizes the deliberations of the working group and suggests potential avenues of research to improve the precision, timing, and durability of treatments for Myeloma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132980304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132980304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41408-022-00695-5
DO - 10.1038/s41408-022-00695-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35768410
AN - SCOPUS:85132980304
SN - 2044-5385
VL - 12
JO - Blood Cancer Journal
JF - Blood Cancer Journal
IS - 6
M1 - 98
ER -