Gait of stance control orthosis users: The Dynamic Knee Brace System

Steven E. Irby, Kathie A. Bernhardt, Kenton R Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals with weak or absent quadriceps who wish to walk independently are prescribed knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs). New stance control orthosis (SCO) designs automatically release the knee to allow swing phase flexion and extension while still locking the joint during stance. Twenty-one participants were fitted unilaterally with the Dynamic Knee Brace System (DKBS), a non-commercial SCO. Thirteen subjects were experienced KAFO users (average 28 ± 18 years of experience) while eight were novice users. Novice users demonstrated increased velocity (55 vs. 71cm/sec, p = 0.048) and cadence (77 vs. 85 steps/min, p < 0.05) when using the DKBS over the traditional locked KAFO. Experienced KAFO users tended to have reduced velocity and cadence measures when using the SCO (p < 0.10). Knee range of motion was significantly greater for the novice group than for the experienced group (55.2 ± 4.8 vs. 42.6 ± 3.8°, p = 0.05). Peak knee extension moments tended to be greater for the experienced group (0.29 ± 0.21 vs. 0.087 ± 0.047 Nm/kg, p = 0.09). This report describes gait changes during the introductory phase of DKBS adoption. Experienced KAFO users undoubtedly had ingrained gait patterns designed to compensate for walking with a standard locked KAFO. These patterns may have limited the ability of those users from taking full and immediate advantage of the SCO capabilities. Also, alternate SCO systems may engender different results. Comparison studies and longer term field studies are needed to clarify benefits of the various bracing options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-282
Number of pages14
JournalProsthetics and Orthotics International
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Orthotic Devices
Braces
Gait
Knee
Foot Orthoses
Ankle
Articular Range of Motion
Walking
Joints

Keywords

  • Gait
  • KAFO
  • Stance control orthosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Gait of stance control orthosis users : The Dynamic Knee Brace System. / Irby, Steven E.; Bernhardt, Kathie A.; Kaufman, Kenton R.

In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 29, No. 3, 12.2005, p. 269-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{274f1640cdcf4a3fa97acc7e75dc8ff4,
title = "Gait of stance control orthosis users: The Dynamic Knee Brace System",
abstract = "Individuals with weak or absent quadriceps who wish to walk independently are prescribed knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs). New stance control orthosis (SCO) designs automatically release the knee to allow swing phase flexion and extension while still locking the joint during stance. Twenty-one participants were fitted unilaterally with the Dynamic Knee Brace System (DKBS), a non-commercial SCO. Thirteen subjects were experienced KAFO users (average 28 ± 18 years of experience) while eight were novice users. Novice users demonstrated increased velocity (55 vs. 71cm/sec, p = 0.048) and cadence (77 vs. 85 steps/min, p < 0.05) when using the DKBS over the traditional locked KAFO. Experienced KAFO users tended to have reduced velocity and cadence measures when using the SCO (p < 0.10). Knee range of motion was significantly greater for the novice group than for the experienced group (55.2 ± 4.8 vs. 42.6 ± 3.8°, p = 0.05). Peak knee extension moments tended to be greater for the experienced group (0.29 ± 0.21 vs. 0.087 ± 0.047 Nm/kg, p = 0.09). This report describes gait changes during the introductory phase of DKBS adoption. Experienced KAFO users undoubtedly had ingrained gait patterns designed to compensate for walking with a standard locked KAFO. These patterns may have limited the ability of those users from taking full and immediate advantage of the SCO capabilities. Also, alternate SCO systems may engender different results. Comparison studies and longer term field studies are needed to clarify benefits of the various bracing options.",
keywords = "Gait, KAFO, Stance control orthosis",
author = "Irby, {Steven E.} and Bernhardt, {Kathie A.} and Kaufman, {Kenton R}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/03093640500238915",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "269--282",
journal = "Prosthetics and Orthotics International",
issn = "0309-3646",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gait of stance control orthosis users

T2 - The Dynamic Knee Brace System

AU - Irby, Steven E.

AU - Bernhardt, Kathie A.

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Individuals with weak or absent quadriceps who wish to walk independently are prescribed knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs). New stance control orthosis (SCO) designs automatically release the knee to allow swing phase flexion and extension while still locking the joint during stance. Twenty-one participants were fitted unilaterally with the Dynamic Knee Brace System (DKBS), a non-commercial SCO. Thirteen subjects were experienced KAFO users (average 28 ± 18 years of experience) while eight were novice users. Novice users demonstrated increased velocity (55 vs. 71cm/sec, p = 0.048) and cadence (77 vs. 85 steps/min, p < 0.05) when using the DKBS over the traditional locked KAFO. Experienced KAFO users tended to have reduced velocity and cadence measures when using the SCO (p < 0.10). Knee range of motion was significantly greater for the novice group than for the experienced group (55.2 ± 4.8 vs. 42.6 ± 3.8°, p = 0.05). Peak knee extension moments tended to be greater for the experienced group (0.29 ± 0.21 vs. 0.087 ± 0.047 Nm/kg, p = 0.09). This report describes gait changes during the introductory phase of DKBS adoption. Experienced KAFO users undoubtedly had ingrained gait patterns designed to compensate for walking with a standard locked KAFO. These patterns may have limited the ability of those users from taking full and immediate advantage of the SCO capabilities. Also, alternate SCO systems may engender different results. Comparison studies and longer term field studies are needed to clarify benefits of the various bracing options.

AB - Individuals with weak or absent quadriceps who wish to walk independently are prescribed knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs). New stance control orthosis (SCO) designs automatically release the knee to allow swing phase flexion and extension while still locking the joint during stance. Twenty-one participants were fitted unilaterally with the Dynamic Knee Brace System (DKBS), a non-commercial SCO. Thirteen subjects were experienced KAFO users (average 28 ± 18 years of experience) while eight were novice users. Novice users demonstrated increased velocity (55 vs. 71cm/sec, p = 0.048) and cadence (77 vs. 85 steps/min, p < 0.05) when using the DKBS over the traditional locked KAFO. Experienced KAFO users tended to have reduced velocity and cadence measures when using the SCO (p < 0.10). Knee range of motion was significantly greater for the novice group than for the experienced group (55.2 ± 4.8 vs. 42.6 ± 3.8°, p = 0.05). Peak knee extension moments tended to be greater for the experienced group (0.29 ± 0.21 vs. 0.087 ± 0.047 Nm/kg, p = 0.09). This report describes gait changes during the introductory phase of DKBS adoption. Experienced KAFO users undoubtedly had ingrained gait patterns designed to compensate for walking with a standard locked KAFO. These patterns may have limited the ability of those users from taking full and immediate advantage of the SCO capabilities. Also, alternate SCO systems may engender different results. Comparison studies and longer term field studies are needed to clarify benefits of the various bracing options.

KW - Gait

KW - KAFO

KW - Stance control orthosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30844443684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30844443684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03093640500238915

DO - 10.1080/03093640500238915

M3 - Article

C2 - 16466156

AN - SCOPUS:30844443684

VL - 29

SP - 269

EP - 282

JO - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

JF - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

SN - 0309-3646

IS - 3

ER -