From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Clinical practice in the field of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved over time, as a result of thousands of basic and clinical research studies. While it appears that scientific discovery and adaptive clinical research may be well integrated in case of BMT, there is lack of sufficient literature to definitively understand the process of translation of evidence to practice and if it may be selective In this review, examples from BMT and other areas of medicine are used to highlight the state of and potential barriers to evidence uptake. Strategies to help improve knowledge transfer are discussed and the role of existing framework provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (CIBMTR) to monitor uptake and BMT Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to enhance translation of evidence into practice is highlighted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-357
Number of pages7
JournalBlood Reviews
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Transplantation
Bone Marrow
Research
Registries
Medicine
Clinical Trials
Transplants

Keywords

  • Blood and marrow transplantation
  • Clinical trials
  • Dissemination and implementation research
  • Evidence uptake
  • Practice patterns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Cite this

From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation. / Khera, Nandita D.

In: Blood Reviews, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.11.2015, p. 351-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d96794fbc0574a8eb56fda48a7be7ecd,
title = "From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation",
abstract = "Clinical practice in the field of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved over time, as a result of thousands of basic and clinical research studies. While it appears that scientific discovery and adaptive clinical research may be well integrated in case of BMT, there is lack of sufficient literature to definitively understand the process of translation of evidence to practice and if it may be selective In this review, examples from BMT and other areas of medicine are used to highlight the state of and potential barriers to evidence uptake. Strategies to help improve knowledge transfer are discussed and the role of existing framework provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (CIBMTR) to monitor uptake and BMT Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to enhance translation of evidence into practice is highlighted.",
keywords = "Blood and marrow transplantation, Clinical trials, Dissemination and implementation research, Evidence uptake, Practice patterns",
author = "Khera, {Nandita D}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.blre.2015.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "351--357",
journal = "Blood Reviews",
issn = "0268-960X",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation

AU - Khera, Nandita D

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Clinical practice in the field of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved over time, as a result of thousands of basic and clinical research studies. While it appears that scientific discovery and adaptive clinical research may be well integrated in case of BMT, there is lack of sufficient literature to definitively understand the process of translation of evidence to practice and if it may be selective In this review, examples from BMT and other areas of medicine are used to highlight the state of and potential barriers to evidence uptake. Strategies to help improve knowledge transfer are discussed and the role of existing framework provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (CIBMTR) to monitor uptake and BMT Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to enhance translation of evidence into practice is highlighted.

AB - Clinical practice in the field of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved over time, as a result of thousands of basic and clinical research studies. While it appears that scientific discovery and adaptive clinical research may be well integrated in case of BMT, there is lack of sufficient literature to definitively understand the process of translation of evidence to practice and if it may be selective In this review, examples from BMT and other areas of medicine are used to highlight the state of and potential barriers to evidence uptake. Strategies to help improve knowledge transfer are discussed and the role of existing framework provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (CIBMTR) to monitor uptake and BMT Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to enhance translation of evidence into practice is highlighted.

KW - Blood and marrow transplantation

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Dissemination and implementation research

KW - Evidence uptake

KW - Practice patterns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948075993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948075993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.blre.2015.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.blre.2015.04.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 25934009

AN - SCOPUS:84948075993

VL - 29

SP - 351

EP - 357

JO - Blood Reviews

JF - Blood Reviews

SN - 0268-960X

IS - 6

ER -