Frequency of physician counseling and attitudes toward driving motor vehicles in people with epilepsy: Comparing a mandatory-reporting with a voluntary-reporting state

Joseph F. Drazkowski, Eli S. Neiman, Joseph I. Sirven, Gary N. McAbee, Katherine H. Noe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Driving for the person with epilepsy (PWE) remains an important issue. Requirements for reporting PWE to driving authorities vary across the United States. We studied the prior experiences of PWE regarding counseling for driving in a reporting state (37% in New Jersey) and a nonreporting state (52% in Arizona). A prospective voluntary anonymous survey was conducted among patients with new-onset epilepsy at two epilepsy referral centers. Subjects were queried about prior interactions with health care professionals regarding attitudes toward and knowledge of driving regulations. Practitioners caring for PWE are in the position to provide advice and counsel regarding driving regulations. Fifty percent or fewer subjects were appropriately counseled, regardless of residence requirements. PWE felt they were honest with their physician and 10% of subjects have driven against medical advice. A performance gap exists in the appropriate counseling regarding driving for PWE that has potentially significant safety and legal implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-54
Number of pages3
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Mandatory Reporting
Motor Vehicles
Counseling
Epilepsy
Physicians
Referral and Consultation
Delivery of Health Care
Safety

Keywords

  • Counseling
  • Driving
  • Driving regulations
  • Epilepsy
  • Mandatory reporting
  • Seizures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Frequency of physician counseling and attitudes toward driving motor vehicles in people with epilepsy : Comparing a mandatory-reporting with a voluntary-reporting state. / Drazkowski, Joseph F.; Neiman, Eli S.; Sirven, Joseph I.; McAbee, Gary N.; Noe, Katherine H.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 1, 09.2010, p. 52-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Drazkowski, Joseph F. ; Neiman, Eli S. ; Sirven, Joseph I. ; McAbee, Gary N. ; Noe, Katherine H. / Frequency of physician counseling and attitudes toward driving motor vehicles in people with epilepsy : Comparing a mandatory-reporting with a voluntary-reporting state. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 52-54.
@article{a5f7d83e13ee467db921c5cb3d04184d,
title = "Frequency of physician counseling and attitudes toward driving motor vehicles in people with epilepsy: Comparing a mandatory-reporting with a voluntary-reporting state",
abstract = "Driving for the person with epilepsy (PWE) remains an important issue. Requirements for reporting PWE to driving authorities vary across the United States. We studied the prior experiences of PWE regarding counseling for driving in a reporting state (37{\%} in New Jersey) and a nonreporting state (52{\%} in Arizona). A prospective voluntary anonymous survey was conducted among patients with new-onset epilepsy at two epilepsy referral centers. Subjects were queried about prior interactions with health care professionals regarding attitudes toward and knowledge of driving regulations. Practitioners caring for PWE are in the position to provide advice and counsel regarding driving regulations. Fifty percent or fewer subjects were appropriately counseled, regardless of residence requirements. PWE felt they were honest with their physician and 10{\%} of subjects have driven against medical advice. A performance gap exists in the appropriate counseling regarding driving for PWE that has potentially significant safety and legal implications.",
keywords = "Counseling, Driving, Driving regulations, Epilepsy, Mandatory reporting, Seizures",
author = "Drazkowski, {Joseph F.} and Neiman, {Eli S.} and Sirven, {Joseph I.} and McAbee, {Gary N.} and Noe, {Katherine H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "52--54",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency of physician counseling and attitudes toward driving motor vehicles in people with epilepsy

T2 - Comparing a mandatory-reporting with a voluntary-reporting state

AU - Drazkowski, Joseph F.

AU - Neiman, Eli S.

AU - Sirven, Joseph I.

AU - McAbee, Gary N.

AU - Noe, Katherine H.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Driving for the person with epilepsy (PWE) remains an important issue. Requirements for reporting PWE to driving authorities vary across the United States. We studied the prior experiences of PWE regarding counseling for driving in a reporting state (37% in New Jersey) and a nonreporting state (52% in Arizona). A prospective voluntary anonymous survey was conducted among patients with new-onset epilepsy at two epilepsy referral centers. Subjects were queried about prior interactions with health care professionals regarding attitudes toward and knowledge of driving regulations. Practitioners caring for PWE are in the position to provide advice and counsel regarding driving regulations. Fifty percent or fewer subjects were appropriately counseled, regardless of residence requirements. PWE felt they were honest with their physician and 10% of subjects have driven against medical advice. A performance gap exists in the appropriate counseling regarding driving for PWE that has potentially significant safety and legal implications.

AB - Driving for the person with epilepsy (PWE) remains an important issue. Requirements for reporting PWE to driving authorities vary across the United States. We studied the prior experiences of PWE regarding counseling for driving in a reporting state (37% in New Jersey) and a nonreporting state (52% in Arizona). A prospective voluntary anonymous survey was conducted among patients with new-onset epilepsy at two epilepsy referral centers. Subjects were queried about prior interactions with health care professionals regarding attitudes toward and knowledge of driving regulations. Practitioners caring for PWE are in the position to provide advice and counsel regarding driving regulations. Fifty percent or fewer subjects were appropriately counseled, regardless of residence requirements. PWE felt they were honest with their physician and 10% of subjects have driven against medical advice. A performance gap exists in the appropriate counseling regarding driving for PWE that has potentially significant safety and legal implications.

KW - Counseling

KW - Driving

KW - Driving regulations

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Mandatory reporting

KW - Seizures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956611644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956611644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.041

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.041

M3 - Article

C2 - 20708975

AN - SCOPUS:77956611644

VL - 19

SP - 52

EP - 54

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 1

ER -