Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid artery stenosis

James E. Dix, Brian J. McNulty, David F Kallmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate calculation of the percentage of stenosis is crucial for identifying candidates for endarterectomy. Our goal was to quantify the reduction in diameter of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) as a function of proximal ICA stenosis and to discuss the implications of distal ICA narrowing on the calculation of percentage of stenosis using the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the carotid angiograms of 81 patients referred for evaluation of carotid stenosis. The caliber of the ICA stenosis and the diameters of the normal distal ICA, the common carotid artery, and the internal maxillary artery were remeasured with precision calipers. The percentage of stenosis derived from the NASCET criteria were compared with vessel diameter and with the difference in size of the ipsilateral and contralateral distal ICAs. We then recalculated the percentage of stenosis by substituting the presumed normal contralateral distal ICA diameter for the ipsilateral distal ICA diameter. RESULTS: In carotid arteries without significant stenosis (<70%), the distal ICA diameter measured 5.94 ±10 mm, but in vessels with severe stenosis (>70%), the distal ICA diameter measured 4.69 ± 1.23 mm. After recalculation, four of 26 vessels were upgraded in classification from moderate (40% to 69%) to severe (>70%) stenosis. CONCLUSION: The diameter of the distal ICA begins to decrease when the proximal stenosis is 60% or greater. If the ICA distal to a stenosis is smaller than the contralateral ICA, recalculating the percentage of stenosis by substituting measurements of the contralateral distal ICA diameter may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1215-1218
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume19
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Stenosis
Internal Carotid Artery
Pathologic Constriction
Carotid Endarterectomy
Maxillary Artery
Endarterectomy
Common Carotid Artery
Carotid Arteries
Angiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid artery stenosis. / Dix, James E.; McNulty, Brian J.; Kallmes, David F.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 19, No. 7, 1998, p. 1215-1218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80cb411fbc5644b49cfff7b5a7967466,
title = "Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid artery stenosis",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Accurate calculation of the percentage of stenosis is crucial for identifying candidates for endarterectomy. Our goal was to quantify the reduction in diameter of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) as a function of proximal ICA stenosis and to discuss the implications of distal ICA narrowing on the calculation of percentage of stenosis using the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the carotid angiograms of 81 patients referred for evaluation of carotid stenosis. The caliber of the ICA stenosis and the diameters of the normal distal ICA, the common carotid artery, and the internal maxillary artery were remeasured with precision calipers. The percentage of stenosis derived from the NASCET criteria were compared with vessel diameter and with the difference in size of the ipsilateral and contralateral distal ICAs. We then recalculated the percentage of stenosis by substituting the presumed normal contralateral distal ICA diameter for the ipsilateral distal ICA diameter. RESULTS: In carotid arteries without significant stenosis (<70{\%}), the distal ICA diameter measured 5.94 ±10 mm, but in vessels with severe stenosis (>70{\%}), the distal ICA diameter measured 4.69 ± 1.23 mm. After recalculation, four of 26 vessels were upgraded in classification from moderate (40{\%} to 69{\%}) to severe (>70{\%}) stenosis. CONCLUSION: The diameter of the distal ICA begins to decrease when the proximal stenosis is 60{\%} or greater. If the ICA distal to a stenosis is smaller than the contralateral ICA, recalculating the percentage of stenosis by substituting measurements of the contralateral distal ICA diameter may be warranted.",
author = "Dix, {James E.} and McNulty, {Brian J.} and Kallmes, {David F}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1215--1218",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid artery stenosis

AU - Dix, James E.

AU - McNulty, Brian J.

AU - Kallmes, David F

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - PURPOSE: Accurate calculation of the percentage of stenosis is crucial for identifying candidates for endarterectomy. Our goal was to quantify the reduction in diameter of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) as a function of proximal ICA stenosis and to discuss the implications of distal ICA narrowing on the calculation of percentage of stenosis using the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the carotid angiograms of 81 patients referred for evaluation of carotid stenosis. The caliber of the ICA stenosis and the diameters of the normal distal ICA, the common carotid artery, and the internal maxillary artery were remeasured with precision calipers. The percentage of stenosis derived from the NASCET criteria were compared with vessel diameter and with the difference in size of the ipsilateral and contralateral distal ICAs. We then recalculated the percentage of stenosis by substituting the presumed normal contralateral distal ICA diameter for the ipsilateral distal ICA diameter. RESULTS: In carotid arteries without significant stenosis (<70%), the distal ICA diameter measured 5.94 ±10 mm, but in vessels with severe stenosis (>70%), the distal ICA diameter measured 4.69 ± 1.23 mm. After recalculation, four of 26 vessels were upgraded in classification from moderate (40% to 69%) to severe (>70%) stenosis. CONCLUSION: The diameter of the distal ICA begins to decrease when the proximal stenosis is 60% or greater. If the ICA distal to a stenosis is smaller than the contralateral ICA, recalculating the percentage of stenosis by substituting measurements of the contralateral distal ICA diameter may be warranted.

AB - PURPOSE: Accurate calculation of the percentage of stenosis is crucial for identifying candidates for endarterectomy. Our goal was to quantify the reduction in diameter of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) as a function of proximal ICA stenosis and to discuss the implications of distal ICA narrowing on the calculation of percentage of stenosis using the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the carotid angiograms of 81 patients referred for evaluation of carotid stenosis. The caliber of the ICA stenosis and the diameters of the normal distal ICA, the common carotid artery, and the internal maxillary artery were remeasured with precision calipers. The percentage of stenosis derived from the NASCET criteria were compared with vessel diameter and with the difference in size of the ipsilateral and contralateral distal ICAs. We then recalculated the percentage of stenosis by substituting the presumed normal contralateral distal ICA diameter for the ipsilateral distal ICA diameter. RESULTS: In carotid arteries without significant stenosis (<70%), the distal ICA diameter measured 5.94 ±10 mm, but in vessels with severe stenosis (>70%), the distal ICA diameter measured 4.69 ± 1.23 mm. After recalculation, four of 26 vessels were upgraded in classification from moderate (40% to 69%) to severe (>70%) stenosis. CONCLUSION: The diameter of the distal ICA begins to decrease when the proximal stenosis is 60% or greater. If the ICA distal to a stenosis is smaller than the contralateral ICA, recalculating the percentage of stenosis by substituting measurements of the contralateral distal ICA diameter may be warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032231890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032231890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9726455

AN - SCOPUS:0032231890

VL - 19

SP - 1215

EP - 1218

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 7

ER -