Focal fibrosis of the breast: Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation

Geraldine Revelon, Mark E. Sherman, Olga M B Gatewood, Rachel F. Brem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize mammographic and ultrasonographic (US) features of focal fibrosis of the breast (FFB), to compare the radiologic and histopathologic findings, to investigate the incidence of FFB, and to determine if histopathologic diagnosis of FFB is an acceptable diagnosis for specific mammographic and US findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of findings from 1,268 surgical excisional and 796 percutaneous breast biopsies (290 US-guided, 370 stereotactically guided, and 136 vacuum-assisted stereotactically-guided) revealed 44 (2.1%) diagnoses of FFB. Mammographic and US features were correlated with histopathologic types. RESULTS: Thirty- seven (84%) of the 44 lesions diagnosed as FFB were visualized on mammograms and appeared as six (14%) circumscribed masses, two (5%) lobulated mases, one (2%) microlobulated mass, 11 (25%) obscured masses, two (5%) architectural distortions, and 15 (34%) asymmetric densities. Seven palpable lesions were not visualized on mammograms. Thirty-three of the 44 lesions were evaluated at US; 25 (76%) of 33 were visible. Twenty (80%) of 25 were well-defined hypoechoic masses; three (12%), ill-defined masses; and two (8%), marked shadowing without visible mass. At histopathologic examination, 17 (39%) of the 44 lesions were characterized as masslike fibrosis; 14 (32%), as nodular fibrosis; 12 (27%), as haphazard fibrosis; and one (2%), as septal fibrosis. Histopathologic type and specific imaging findings did not correlate statistically. CONCLUSION: FFB is a histopathologic entity that has a wide spectrum of imaging findings. It is an acceptable histopathologic result of percutaneous breast biopsy, provided that careful radiologic-histopathologic clinical correlation is performed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-259
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume216
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast
Fibrosis
Biopsy
Vacuum
Incidence

Keywords

  • Breast radiography, comparative studies
  • Breast, abnormalities
  • Breast, biopsy
  • Breast, fibrous nodule
  • Breast, US

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Revelon, G., Sherman, M. E., Gatewood, O. M. B., & Brem, R. F. (2000). Focal fibrosis of the breast: Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation. Radiology, 216(1), 255-259.

Focal fibrosis of the breast : Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation. / Revelon, Geraldine; Sherman, Mark E.; Gatewood, Olga M B; Brem, Rachel F.

In: Radiology, Vol. 216, No. 1, 2000, p. 255-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Revelon, G, Sherman, ME, Gatewood, OMB & Brem, RF 2000, 'Focal fibrosis of the breast: Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation', Radiology, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 255-259.
Revelon, Geraldine ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Gatewood, Olga M B ; Brem, Rachel F. / Focal fibrosis of the breast : Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation. In: Radiology. 2000 ; Vol. 216, No. 1. pp. 255-259.
@article{c2c8bc7fc69e4c80ac5da8ec6e3fc16f,
title = "Focal fibrosis of the breast: Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To characterize mammographic and ultrasonographic (US) features of focal fibrosis of the breast (FFB), to compare the radiologic and histopathologic findings, to investigate the incidence of FFB, and to determine if histopathologic diagnosis of FFB is an acceptable diagnosis for specific mammographic and US findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of findings from 1,268 surgical excisional and 796 percutaneous breast biopsies (290 US-guided, 370 stereotactically guided, and 136 vacuum-assisted stereotactically-guided) revealed 44 (2.1{\%}) diagnoses of FFB. Mammographic and US features were correlated with histopathologic types. RESULTS: Thirty- seven (84{\%}) of the 44 lesions diagnosed as FFB were visualized on mammograms and appeared as six (14{\%}) circumscribed masses, two (5{\%}) lobulated mases, one (2{\%}) microlobulated mass, 11 (25{\%}) obscured masses, two (5{\%}) architectural distortions, and 15 (34{\%}) asymmetric densities. Seven palpable lesions were not visualized on mammograms. Thirty-three of the 44 lesions were evaluated at US; 25 (76{\%}) of 33 were visible. Twenty (80{\%}) of 25 were well-defined hypoechoic masses; three (12{\%}), ill-defined masses; and two (8{\%}), marked shadowing without visible mass. At histopathologic examination, 17 (39{\%}) of the 44 lesions were characterized as masslike fibrosis; 14 (32{\%}), as nodular fibrosis; 12 (27{\%}), as haphazard fibrosis; and one (2{\%}), as septal fibrosis. Histopathologic type and specific imaging findings did not correlate statistically. CONCLUSION: FFB is a histopathologic entity that has a wide spectrum of imaging findings. It is an acceptable histopathologic result of percutaneous breast biopsy, provided that careful radiologic-histopathologic clinical correlation is performed.",
keywords = "Breast radiography, comparative studies, Breast, abnormalities, Breast, biopsy, Breast, fibrous nodule, Breast, US",
author = "Geraldine Revelon and Sherman, {Mark E.} and Gatewood, {Olga M B} and Brem, {Rachel F.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "216",
pages = "255--259",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Focal fibrosis of the breast

T2 - Imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation

AU - Revelon, Geraldine

AU - Sherman, Mark E.

AU - Gatewood, Olga M B

AU - Brem, Rachel F.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - PURPOSE: To characterize mammographic and ultrasonographic (US) features of focal fibrosis of the breast (FFB), to compare the radiologic and histopathologic findings, to investigate the incidence of FFB, and to determine if histopathologic diagnosis of FFB is an acceptable diagnosis for specific mammographic and US findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of findings from 1,268 surgical excisional and 796 percutaneous breast biopsies (290 US-guided, 370 stereotactically guided, and 136 vacuum-assisted stereotactically-guided) revealed 44 (2.1%) diagnoses of FFB. Mammographic and US features were correlated with histopathologic types. RESULTS: Thirty- seven (84%) of the 44 lesions diagnosed as FFB were visualized on mammograms and appeared as six (14%) circumscribed masses, two (5%) lobulated mases, one (2%) microlobulated mass, 11 (25%) obscured masses, two (5%) architectural distortions, and 15 (34%) asymmetric densities. Seven palpable lesions were not visualized on mammograms. Thirty-three of the 44 lesions were evaluated at US; 25 (76%) of 33 were visible. Twenty (80%) of 25 were well-defined hypoechoic masses; three (12%), ill-defined masses; and two (8%), marked shadowing without visible mass. At histopathologic examination, 17 (39%) of the 44 lesions were characterized as masslike fibrosis; 14 (32%), as nodular fibrosis; 12 (27%), as haphazard fibrosis; and one (2%), as septal fibrosis. Histopathologic type and specific imaging findings did not correlate statistically. CONCLUSION: FFB is a histopathologic entity that has a wide spectrum of imaging findings. It is an acceptable histopathologic result of percutaneous breast biopsy, provided that careful radiologic-histopathologic clinical correlation is performed.

AB - PURPOSE: To characterize mammographic and ultrasonographic (US) features of focal fibrosis of the breast (FFB), to compare the radiologic and histopathologic findings, to investigate the incidence of FFB, and to determine if histopathologic diagnosis of FFB is an acceptable diagnosis for specific mammographic and US findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of findings from 1,268 surgical excisional and 796 percutaneous breast biopsies (290 US-guided, 370 stereotactically guided, and 136 vacuum-assisted stereotactically-guided) revealed 44 (2.1%) diagnoses of FFB. Mammographic and US features were correlated with histopathologic types. RESULTS: Thirty- seven (84%) of the 44 lesions diagnosed as FFB were visualized on mammograms and appeared as six (14%) circumscribed masses, two (5%) lobulated mases, one (2%) microlobulated mass, 11 (25%) obscured masses, two (5%) architectural distortions, and 15 (34%) asymmetric densities. Seven palpable lesions were not visualized on mammograms. Thirty-three of the 44 lesions were evaluated at US; 25 (76%) of 33 were visible. Twenty (80%) of 25 were well-defined hypoechoic masses; three (12%), ill-defined masses; and two (8%), marked shadowing without visible mass. At histopathologic examination, 17 (39%) of the 44 lesions were characterized as masslike fibrosis; 14 (32%), as nodular fibrosis; 12 (27%), as haphazard fibrosis; and one (2%), as septal fibrosis. Histopathologic type and specific imaging findings did not correlate statistically. CONCLUSION: FFB is a histopathologic entity that has a wide spectrum of imaging findings. It is an acceptable histopathologic result of percutaneous breast biopsy, provided that careful radiologic-histopathologic clinical correlation is performed.

KW - Breast radiography, comparative studies

KW - Breast, abnormalities

KW - Breast, biopsy

KW - Breast, fibrous nodule

KW - Breast, US

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033933766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033933766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10887257

AN - SCOPUS:0033933766

VL - 216

SP - 255

EP - 259

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -