Flexion instability without dislocation after posterior stabilized total knees

Joseph H. Schwab, George J. Haidukewych, Arlen D. Hanssen, David J. Jacofsky, Mark Pagnano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flexion instability after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty has been well documented. We identified an analogous patient group with symptomatic flexion instability without dislocation after primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. We sought to determine the typical symptoms and exam findings that lead to the diagnosis, to assess the reliability of revision total knee arthroplasty as a treatment, and to assess the technical difficulties encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 2001, 10 patients had revision of a well-fixed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for isolated symptomatic flexion instability. The typical constellation of symptoms and physical findings included a sense of instability without giving way, recurrent knee effusions, multiple areas of soft tissue tenderness about the knee, and substantial anterior tibial translation at 90° of flexion. The revision operation focused on balancing the flexion and extension gaps while taking care to fill the enlarged flexion gap. Revision total knee arthroplasty was reliable in alleviating pain (mean Knee Society Pain scores improved from 68 points preoperatively to 89 points postoperatively), improving stability (nine of 10 patients had < 5 mm anterior tibial translation postoperatively) and improving patient satisfaction (nine of 10 patients were satisfied). We had no particular technical difficulties with the revision total knee arthroplasty procedures and had reliably achieved well-balanced flexion and extension gaps. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV-1 (case series).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number440
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Knee
Pain
Patient Satisfaction
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Flexion instability without dislocation after posterior stabilized total knees. / Schwab, Joseph H.; Haidukewych, George J.; Hanssen, Arlen D.; Jacofsky, David J.; Pagnano, Mark.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 440, 11.2005, p. 96-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwab, Joseph H. ; Haidukewych, George J. ; Hanssen, Arlen D. ; Jacofsky, David J. ; Pagnano, Mark. / Flexion instability without dislocation after posterior stabilized total knees. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005 ; No. 440. pp. 96-100.
@article{b0c6304d1a6c41c6947de665a09e5004,
title = "Flexion instability without dislocation after posterior stabilized total knees",
abstract = "Flexion instability after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty has been well documented. We identified an analogous patient group with symptomatic flexion instability without dislocation after primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. We sought to determine the typical symptoms and exam findings that lead to the diagnosis, to assess the reliability of revision total knee arthroplasty as a treatment, and to assess the technical difficulties encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 2001, 10 patients had revision of a well-fixed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for isolated symptomatic flexion instability. The typical constellation of symptoms and physical findings included a sense of instability without giving way, recurrent knee effusions, multiple areas of soft tissue tenderness about the knee, and substantial anterior tibial translation at 90° of flexion. The revision operation focused on balancing the flexion and extension gaps while taking care to fill the enlarged flexion gap. Revision total knee arthroplasty was reliable in alleviating pain (mean Knee Society Pain scores improved from 68 points preoperatively to 89 points postoperatively), improving stability (nine of 10 patients had < 5 mm anterior tibial translation postoperatively) and improving patient satisfaction (nine of 10 patients were satisfied). We had no particular technical difficulties with the revision total knee arthroplasty procedures and had reliably achieved well-balanced flexion and extension gaps. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV-1 (case series).",
author = "Schwab, {Joseph H.} and Haidukewych, {George J.} and Hanssen, {Arlen D.} and Jacofsky, {David J.} and Mark Pagnano",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/01.blo.0000185449.51246.d6",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "96--100",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "440",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexion instability without dislocation after posterior stabilized total knees

AU - Schwab, Joseph H.

AU - Haidukewych, George J.

AU - Hanssen, Arlen D.

AU - Jacofsky, David J.

AU - Pagnano, Mark

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Flexion instability after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty has been well documented. We identified an analogous patient group with symptomatic flexion instability without dislocation after primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. We sought to determine the typical symptoms and exam findings that lead to the diagnosis, to assess the reliability of revision total knee arthroplasty as a treatment, and to assess the technical difficulties encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 2001, 10 patients had revision of a well-fixed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for isolated symptomatic flexion instability. The typical constellation of symptoms and physical findings included a sense of instability without giving way, recurrent knee effusions, multiple areas of soft tissue tenderness about the knee, and substantial anterior tibial translation at 90° of flexion. The revision operation focused on balancing the flexion and extension gaps while taking care to fill the enlarged flexion gap. Revision total knee arthroplasty was reliable in alleviating pain (mean Knee Society Pain scores improved from 68 points preoperatively to 89 points postoperatively), improving stability (nine of 10 patients had < 5 mm anterior tibial translation postoperatively) and improving patient satisfaction (nine of 10 patients were satisfied). We had no particular technical difficulties with the revision total knee arthroplasty procedures and had reliably achieved well-balanced flexion and extension gaps. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV-1 (case series).

AB - Flexion instability after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty has been well documented. We identified an analogous patient group with symptomatic flexion instability without dislocation after primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. We sought to determine the typical symptoms and exam findings that lead to the diagnosis, to assess the reliability of revision total knee arthroplasty as a treatment, and to assess the technical difficulties encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 2001, 10 patients had revision of a well-fixed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for isolated symptomatic flexion instability. The typical constellation of symptoms and physical findings included a sense of instability without giving way, recurrent knee effusions, multiple areas of soft tissue tenderness about the knee, and substantial anterior tibial translation at 90° of flexion. The revision operation focused on balancing the flexion and extension gaps while taking care to fill the enlarged flexion gap. Revision total knee arthroplasty was reliable in alleviating pain (mean Knee Society Pain scores improved from 68 points preoperatively to 89 points postoperatively), improving stability (nine of 10 patients had < 5 mm anterior tibial translation postoperatively) and improving patient satisfaction (nine of 10 patients were satisfied). We had no particular technical difficulties with the revision total knee arthroplasty procedures and had reliably achieved well-balanced flexion and extension gaps. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV-1 (case series).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644444053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644444053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.blo.0000185449.51246.d6

DO - 10.1097/01.blo.0000185449.51246.d6

M3 - Article

C2 - 16239790

AN - SCOPUS:27644444053

SP - 96

EP - 100

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 440

ER -