Flexibility of experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites.

A. R. Le Roux, Nirusha Lachman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Flexure of a dental composite can be detrimental to the success of a restoration. Flexibility considerations are thus important when comparing dental materials to optimize the success of resin restorations. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Flexibility of 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites specimens were compared. It was hypothesized that alumina/feldspar composites would be less flexible under a load than SR ADORO composites and that the flexibility would decrease significantly as the feldspar content was increased. METHODS: Alumina was chemically sintered or bonded with 40%, 50% and 60% feldspar mass, silanized and infiltrated with urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to prepare the alumina/feldspar dental restorative composite specimens. Three point bending tests were performed in the Instron 44 machine for flexural comparison to SR ADORO. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The alumina/feldspar specimens showed lower flexibility (mm displacement) than SR ADORO (p < 0.05). Accurate flexibility comparisons were performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens. Flexibility comparisons performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens indicated that experimental alumina/feldspar dental composites may provide added marginal seal benefit. However confirmation via in vivo function of alumina/feldspar dental composites is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-72
Number of pages5
JournalSADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging
Volume65
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Aluminum Oxide
Tooth
Dental Materials
feldspar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Flexibility of experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites. / Le Roux, A. R.; Lachman, Nirusha.

In: SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging, Vol. 65, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 68-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e85f85916674b00a02ebf440150e1b1,
title = "Flexibility of experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites.",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Flexure of a dental composite can be detrimental to the success of a restoration. Flexibility considerations are thus important when comparing dental materials to optimize the success of resin restorations. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Flexibility of 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites specimens were compared. It was hypothesized that alumina/feldspar composites would be less flexible under a load than SR ADORO composites and that the flexibility would decrease significantly as the feldspar content was increased. METHODS: Alumina was chemically sintered or bonded with 40{\%}, 50{\%} and 60{\%} feldspar mass, silanized and infiltrated with urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to prepare the alumina/feldspar dental restorative composite specimens. Three point bending tests were performed in the Instron 44 machine for flexural comparison to SR ADORO. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The alumina/feldspar specimens showed lower flexibility (mm displacement) than SR ADORO (p < 0.05). Accurate flexibility comparisons were performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens. Flexibility comparisons performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens indicated that experimental alumina/feldspar dental composites may provide added marginal seal benefit. However confirmation via in vivo function of alumina/feldspar dental composites is recommended.",
author = "{Le Roux}, {A. R.} and Nirusha Lachman",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "68--72",
journal = "South African dental journal. Suid Afrikaanse tandarts tydskrif",
issn = "1029-4864",
publisher = "African Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexibility of experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites.

AU - Le Roux, A. R.

AU - Lachman, Nirusha

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Flexure of a dental composite can be detrimental to the success of a restoration. Flexibility considerations are thus important when comparing dental materials to optimize the success of resin restorations. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Flexibility of 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites specimens were compared. It was hypothesized that alumina/feldspar composites would be less flexible under a load than SR ADORO composites and that the flexibility would decrease significantly as the feldspar content was increased. METHODS: Alumina was chemically sintered or bonded with 40%, 50% and 60% feldspar mass, silanized and infiltrated with urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to prepare the alumina/feldspar dental restorative composite specimens. Three point bending tests were performed in the Instron 44 machine for flexural comparison to SR ADORO. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The alumina/feldspar specimens showed lower flexibility (mm displacement) than SR ADORO (p < 0.05). Accurate flexibility comparisons were performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens. Flexibility comparisons performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens indicated that experimental alumina/feldspar dental composites may provide added marginal seal benefit. However confirmation via in vivo function of alumina/feldspar dental composites is recommended.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Flexure of a dental composite can be detrimental to the success of a restoration. Flexibility considerations are thus important when comparing dental materials to optimize the success of resin restorations. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Flexibility of 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 experimental alumina/feldspar and SR ADORO dental composites specimens were compared. It was hypothesized that alumina/feldspar composites would be less flexible under a load than SR ADORO composites and that the flexibility would decrease significantly as the feldspar content was increased. METHODS: Alumina was chemically sintered or bonded with 40%, 50% and 60% feldspar mass, silanized and infiltrated with urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to prepare the alumina/feldspar dental restorative composite specimens. Three point bending tests were performed in the Instron 44 machine for flexural comparison to SR ADORO. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The alumina/feldspar specimens showed lower flexibility (mm displacement) than SR ADORO (p < 0.05). Accurate flexibility comparisons were performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens. Flexibility comparisons performed with 5.6 x 18.0 x 2.0 mm3 specimens indicated that experimental alumina/feldspar dental composites may provide added marginal seal benefit. However confirmation via in vivo function of alumina/feldspar dental composites is recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954948749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954948749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20527579

AN - SCOPUS:77954948749

VL - 65

SP - 68

EP - 72

JO - South African dental journal. Suid Afrikaanse tandarts tydskrif

JF - South African dental journal. Suid Afrikaanse tandarts tydskrif

SN - 1029-4864

IS - 2

ER -