Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Revolution or evolution - What are the issues?

David Holmes, Warren K. Laskey, Merrill A. Wondrow, Jack T. Cusma

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Continuous developments in digital imaging technology have contributed to the vital role held today by digital X-ray imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Foremost among these developments is the replacement of cine film with digital data equivalents as the procedure record. Other improvements include software innovations and processing algorithms, along with new types of hardware capable of delivering required functionality more rapidly. A significant recent development is that of the flat-panel X-ray detector as a replacement for the image intensifier, which has served the needs of the cardiac catheterization laboratory for nearly 5 decades. Clinical users must evaluate the respective technologies and determine whether one or the other meets the needs of their own laboratories. In this review, the two competing detector technologies are reviewed and a summary of general advantages and disadvantages of each is provided. A qualitative description is provided of parameters that can be used to assess quantitatively the performance of detectors and imaging systems. Using such objective measurements, together with standard techniques for evaluating imaging systems, angiographers and managers can better arrive at informed decisions for their own situation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-330
Number of pages7
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004

Fingerprint

Cardiac Catheterization
Technology
X-Rays
Software

Keywords

  • Cardiac imaging
  • Fluoroscopy
  • X-ray angiography
  • X-ray detectors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory : Revolution or evolution - What are the issues? / Holmes, David; Laskey, Warren K.; Wondrow, Merrill A.; Cusma, Jack T.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.11.2004, p. 324-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8420c7255d334f14886e038205e1187c,
title = "Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Revolution or evolution - What are the issues?",
abstract = "Continuous developments in digital imaging technology have contributed to the vital role held today by digital X-ray imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Foremost among these developments is the replacement of cine film with digital data equivalents as the procedure record. Other improvements include software innovations and processing algorithms, along with new types of hardware capable of delivering required functionality more rapidly. A significant recent development is that of the flat-panel X-ray detector as a replacement for the image intensifier, which has served the needs of the cardiac catheterization laboratory for nearly 5 decades. Clinical users must evaluate the respective technologies and determine whether one or the other meets the needs of their own laboratories. In this review, the two competing detector technologies are reviewed and a summary of general advantages and disadvantages of each is provided. A qualitative description is provided of parameters that can be used to assess quantitatively the performance of detectors and imaging systems. Using such objective measurements, together with standard techniques for evaluating imaging systems, angiographers and managers can better arrive at informed decisions for their own situation.",
keywords = "Cardiac imaging, Fluoroscopy, X-ray angiography, X-ray detectors",
author = "David Holmes and Laskey, {Warren K.} and Wondrow, {Merrill A.} and Cusma, {Jack T.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.20166",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "324--330",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

T2 - Revolution or evolution - What are the issues?

AU - Holmes, David

AU - Laskey, Warren K.

AU - Wondrow, Merrill A.

AU - Cusma, Jack T.

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - Continuous developments in digital imaging technology have contributed to the vital role held today by digital X-ray imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Foremost among these developments is the replacement of cine film with digital data equivalents as the procedure record. Other improvements include software innovations and processing algorithms, along with new types of hardware capable of delivering required functionality more rapidly. A significant recent development is that of the flat-panel X-ray detector as a replacement for the image intensifier, which has served the needs of the cardiac catheterization laboratory for nearly 5 decades. Clinical users must evaluate the respective technologies and determine whether one or the other meets the needs of their own laboratories. In this review, the two competing detector technologies are reviewed and a summary of general advantages and disadvantages of each is provided. A qualitative description is provided of parameters that can be used to assess quantitatively the performance of detectors and imaging systems. Using such objective measurements, together with standard techniques for evaluating imaging systems, angiographers and managers can better arrive at informed decisions for their own situation.

AB - Continuous developments in digital imaging technology have contributed to the vital role held today by digital X-ray imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Foremost among these developments is the replacement of cine film with digital data equivalents as the procedure record. Other improvements include software innovations and processing algorithms, along with new types of hardware capable of delivering required functionality more rapidly. A significant recent development is that of the flat-panel X-ray detector as a replacement for the image intensifier, which has served the needs of the cardiac catheterization laboratory for nearly 5 decades. Clinical users must evaluate the respective technologies and determine whether one or the other meets the needs of their own laboratories. In this review, the two competing detector technologies are reviewed and a summary of general advantages and disadvantages of each is provided. A qualitative description is provided of parameters that can be used to assess quantitatively the performance of detectors and imaging systems. Using such objective measurements, together with standard techniques for evaluating imaging systems, angiographers and managers can better arrive at informed decisions for their own situation.

KW - Cardiac imaging

KW - Fluoroscopy

KW - X-ray angiography

KW - X-ray detectors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8544226224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8544226224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.20166

DO - 10.1002/ccd.20166

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15505837

AN - SCOPUS:8544226224

VL - 63

SP - 324

EP - 330

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 3

ER -