Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate bayesian method using marginal test statistics

Wenan Chen, Beth R. Larrabee, Inna G. Ovsyannikova, Richard B Kennedy, Iana H. Haralambieva, Gregory A. Poland, Daniel J Schaid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two recently developed fine-mapping methods, CAVIAR and PAINTOR, demonstrate better performance over other fine-mapping methods. They also have the advantage of using only the marginal test statistics and the correlation among SNPs. Both methods leverage the fact that the marginal test statistics asymptotically follow a multivariate normal distribution and are likelihood based. However, their relationship with Bayesian fine mapping, such as BIMBAM, is not clear. In this study, we first show that CAVIAR and BIMBAM are actually approximately equivalent to each other. This leads to a fine-mapping method using marginal test statistics in the Bayesian framework, which we call CAVIAR Bayes factor (CAVIARBF). Another advantage of the Bayesian framework is that it can answer both association and fine-mapping questions. We also used simulations to compare CAVIARBF with other methods under different numbers of causal variants. The results showed that both CAVIARBF and BIMBAM have better performance than PAINTOR and other methods. Compared to BIMBAM, CAVIARBF has the advantage of using only marginal test statistics and takes about one-quarter to one-fifth of the running time. We applied different methods on two independent cohorts of the same phenotype. Results showed that CAVIARBF, BIMBAM, and PAINTOR selected the same top 3 SNPs; however, CAVIARBF and BIMBAM had better consistency in selecting the top 10 ranked SNPs between the two cohorts. Software is available at https://bitbucket.org/Wenan/caviarbf.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)719-736
Number of pages18
JournalGenetics
Volume200
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Normal Distribution
Software
Phenotype

Keywords

  • Bayesian fine mapping
  • Causal variants
  • Marginal test statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate bayesian method using marginal test statistics. / Chen, Wenan; Larrabee, Beth R.; Ovsyannikova, Inna G.; Kennedy, Richard B; Haralambieva, Iana H.; Poland, Gregory A.; Schaid, Daniel J.

In: Genetics, Vol. 200, No. 3, 01.07.2015, p. 719-736.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Wenan ; Larrabee, Beth R. ; Ovsyannikova, Inna G. ; Kennedy, Richard B ; Haralambieva, Iana H. ; Poland, Gregory A. ; Schaid, Daniel J. / Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate bayesian method using marginal test statistics. In: Genetics. 2015 ; Vol. 200, No. 3. pp. 719-736.
@article{412eb37846874607a4e671490fef71b3,
title = "Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate bayesian method using marginal test statistics",
abstract = "Two recently developed fine-mapping methods, CAVIAR and PAINTOR, demonstrate better performance over other fine-mapping methods. They also have the advantage of using only the marginal test statistics and the correlation among SNPs. Both methods leverage the fact that the marginal test statistics asymptotically follow a multivariate normal distribution and are likelihood based. However, their relationship with Bayesian fine mapping, such as BIMBAM, is not clear. In this study, we first show that CAVIAR and BIMBAM are actually approximately equivalent to each other. This leads to a fine-mapping method using marginal test statistics in the Bayesian framework, which we call CAVIAR Bayes factor (CAVIARBF). Another advantage of the Bayesian framework is that it can answer both association and fine-mapping questions. We also used simulations to compare CAVIARBF with other methods under different numbers of causal variants. The results showed that both CAVIARBF and BIMBAM have better performance than PAINTOR and other methods. Compared to BIMBAM, CAVIARBF has the advantage of using only marginal test statistics and takes about one-quarter to one-fifth of the running time. We applied different methods on two independent cohorts of the same phenotype. Results showed that CAVIARBF, BIMBAM, and PAINTOR selected the same top 3 SNPs; however, CAVIARBF and BIMBAM had better consistency in selecting the top 10 ranked SNPs between the two cohorts. Software is available at https://bitbucket.org/Wenan/caviarbf.",
keywords = "Bayesian fine mapping, Causal variants, Marginal test statistics",
author = "Wenan Chen and Larrabee, {Beth R.} and Ovsyannikova, {Inna G.} and Kennedy, {Richard B} and Haralambieva, {Iana H.} and Poland, {Gregory A.} and Schaid, {Daniel J}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1534/genetics.115.176107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "200",
pages = "719--736",
journal = "Genetics",
issn = "0016-6731",
publisher = "Genetics Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate bayesian method using marginal test statistics

AU - Chen, Wenan

AU - Larrabee, Beth R.

AU - Ovsyannikova, Inna G.

AU - Kennedy, Richard B

AU - Haralambieva, Iana H.

AU - Poland, Gregory A.

AU - Schaid, Daniel J

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Two recently developed fine-mapping methods, CAVIAR and PAINTOR, demonstrate better performance over other fine-mapping methods. They also have the advantage of using only the marginal test statistics and the correlation among SNPs. Both methods leverage the fact that the marginal test statistics asymptotically follow a multivariate normal distribution and are likelihood based. However, their relationship with Bayesian fine mapping, such as BIMBAM, is not clear. In this study, we first show that CAVIAR and BIMBAM are actually approximately equivalent to each other. This leads to a fine-mapping method using marginal test statistics in the Bayesian framework, which we call CAVIAR Bayes factor (CAVIARBF). Another advantage of the Bayesian framework is that it can answer both association and fine-mapping questions. We also used simulations to compare CAVIARBF with other methods under different numbers of causal variants. The results showed that both CAVIARBF and BIMBAM have better performance than PAINTOR and other methods. Compared to BIMBAM, CAVIARBF has the advantage of using only marginal test statistics and takes about one-quarter to one-fifth of the running time. We applied different methods on two independent cohorts of the same phenotype. Results showed that CAVIARBF, BIMBAM, and PAINTOR selected the same top 3 SNPs; however, CAVIARBF and BIMBAM had better consistency in selecting the top 10 ranked SNPs between the two cohorts. Software is available at https://bitbucket.org/Wenan/caviarbf.

AB - Two recently developed fine-mapping methods, CAVIAR and PAINTOR, demonstrate better performance over other fine-mapping methods. They also have the advantage of using only the marginal test statistics and the correlation among SNPs. Both methods leverage the fact that the marginal test statistics asymptotically follow a multivariate normal distribution and are likelihood based. However, their relationship with Bayesian fine mapping, such as BIMBAM, is not clear. In this study, we first show that CAVIAR and BIMBAM are actually approximately equivalent to each other. This leads to a fine-mapping method using marginal test statistics in the Bayesian framework, which we call CAVIAR Bayes factor (CAVIARBF). Another advantage of the Bayesian framework is that it can answer both association and fine-mapping questions. We also used simulations to compare CAVIARBF with other methods under different numbers of causal variants. The results showed that both CAVIARBF and BIMBAM have better performance than PAINTOR and other methods. Compared to BIMBAM, CAVIARBF has the advantage of using only marginal test statistics and takes about one-quarter to one-fifth of the running time. We applied different methods on two independent cohorts of the same phenotype. Results showed that CAVIARBF, BIMBAM, and PAINTOR selected the same top 3 SNPs; however, CAVIARBF and BIMBAM had better consistency in selecting the top 10 ranked SNPs between the two cohorts. Software is available at https://bitbucket.org/Wenan/caviarbf.

KW - Bayesian fine mapping

KW - Causal variants

KW - Marginal test statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937035185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937035185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1534/genetics.115.176107

DO - 10.1534/genetics.115.176107

M3 - Article

C2 - 25948564

AN - SCOPUS:84937035185

VL - 200

SP - 719

EP - 736

JO - Genetics

JF - Genetics

SN - 0016-6731

IS - 3

ER -