Female donors and transfusion-related acute lung injury

Rutger A. Middelburg, Daniëlle Van Stein, Barbara Zupanska, Magorzata Uhrynowska, Ognjen Gajic, Eduardo Muñiz-Diaz, Nuria Nogués Galvez, Christopher C. Silliman, Tom Krusius, Jonathan P. Wallis, Jan P. Vandenbroucke, Ernest Briët, Johanna G. Van Der Bom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although quantitative evidence is lacking, it is generally believed that the majority of cases of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) are caused by female blood donors. We aimed to examine the relation between female donors and the occurrence of TRALI. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed an international, multicenter case-referent study. TRALI patients who were diagnosed clinically, independent of serology or donor sex, and had received transfusions either only from male donors or only from female donors (unisex cases) were selected. The observed sex distribution among the donors of these TRALI patients was compared to the expected sex distribution, based on the relevant donor populations. RESULTS: Eighty-three clinical TRALI cases were included; 67 cases received only red blood cells (RBCs), 13 only plasma-rich products, and three both. Among RBC recipients the relative risk (RR) of TRALI after a transfusion from a female donor was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.1) and among plasma-rich product recipients the RR was 19 (95% CI, 1.9-191). The p value for the difference between RBCs and plasma was 0.023. CONCLUSION: Our data support the notion that plasma from female donors is associated with an increased risk of TRALI, while RBCs from female donors are not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2447-2454
Number of pages8
JournalTransfusion
Volume50
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Hematology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Female donors and transfusion-related acute lung injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this