Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training

A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis

Rose Hatala, David Allan Cook, Benjamin Zendejas, Stanley J. Hamstra, Ryan Brydges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although feedback has been identified as a key instructional feature in simulation based medical education (SBME), we remain uncertain as to the magnitude of its effectiveness and the mechanisms by which it may be effective. We employed a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis to examine the effectiveness of feedback for SBME procedural skills training and to examine how it works in this context. Our results demonstrate that feedback is moderately effective during procedural skills training in SBME, with a pooled effect size favoring feedback for skill outcomes of 0.74 (95 % CI 0.38-1.09; p < .001). Terminal feedback appears more effective than concurrent feedback for novice learners' skill retention. Multiple sources of feedback, including instructor feedback, lead to short-term performance gains although data on long-term effects is lacking. The mechanism by which feedback may be operating is consistent with the guidance hypothesis, with more research needed to examine other mechanisms such as cognitive load theory and social development theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-272
Number of pages22
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
narrative
simulation
Medical Education
education
development theory
social development
instructor
Research
performance

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Motor learning
  • Procedural skills training
  • Simulation-based medical education
  • Technical skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training : A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. / Hatala, Rose; Cook, David Allan; Zendejas, Benjamin; Hamstra, Stanley J.; Brydges, Ryan.

In: Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2014, p. 251-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hatala, Rose ; Cook, David Allan ; Zendejas, Benjamin ; Hamstra, Stanley J. ; Brydges, Ryan. / Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training : A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. In: Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 251-272.
@article{0e0b74ff40154211a5439c19298076e8,
title = "Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis",
abstract = "Although feedback has been identified as a key instructional feature in simulation based medical education (SBME), we remain uncertain as to the magnitude of its effectiveness and the mechanisms by which it may be effective. We employed a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis to examine the effectiveness of feedback for SBME procedural skills training and to examine how it works in this context. Our results demonstrate that feedback is moderately effective during procedural skills training in SBME, with a pooled effect size favoring feedback for skill outcomes of 0.74 (95 {\%} CI 0.38-1.09; p < .001). Terminal feedback appears more effective than concurrent feedback for novice learners' skill retention. Multiple sources of feedback, including instructor feedback, lead to short-term performance gains although data on long-term effects is lacking. The mechanism by which feedback may be operating is consistent with the guidance hypothesis, with more research needed to examine other mechanisms such as cognitive load theory and social development theory.",
keywords = "Feedback, Motor learning, Procedural skills training, Simulation-based medical education, Technical skills",
author = "Rose Hatala and Cook, {David Allan} and Benjamin Zendejas and Hamstra, {Stanley J.} and Ryan Brydges",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10459-013-9462-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "251--272",
journal = "Advances in Health Sciences Education",
issn = "1382-4996",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training

T2 - A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis

AU - Hatala, Rose

AU - Cook, David Allan

AU - Zendejas, Benjamin

AU - Hamstra, Stanley J.

AU - Brydges, Ryan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although feedback has been identified as a key instructional feature in simulation based medical education (SBME), we remain uncertain as to the magnitude of its effectiveness and the mechanisms by which it may be effective. We employed a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis to examine the effectiveness of feedback for SBME procedural skills training and to examine how it works in this context. Our results demonstrate that feedback is moderately effective during procedural skills training in SBME, with a pooled effect size favoring feedback for skill outcomes of 0.74 (95 % CI 0.38-1.09; p < .001). Terminal feedback appears more effective than concurrent feedback for novice learners' skill retention. Multiple sources of feedback, including instructor feedback, lead to short-term performance gains although data on long-term effects is lacking. The mechanism by which feedback may be operating is consistent with the guidance hypothesis, with more research needed to examine other mechanisms such as cognitive load theory and social development theory.

AB - Although feedback has been identified as a key instructional feature in simulation based medical education (SBME), we remain uncertain as to the magnitude of its effectiveness and the mechanisms by which it may be effective. We employed a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis to examine the effectiveness of feedback for SBME procedural skills training and to examine how it works in this context. Our results demonstrate that feedback is moderately effective during procedural skills training in SBME, with a pooled effect size favoring feedback for skill outcomes of 0.74 (95 % CI 0.38-1.09; p < .001). Terminal feedback appears more effective than concurrent feedback for novice learners' skill retention. Multiple sources of feedback, including instructor feedback, lead to short-term performance gains although data on long-term effects is lacking. The mechanism by which feedback may be operating is consistent with the guidance hypothesis, with more research needed to examine other mechanisms such as cognitive load theory and social development theory.

KW - Feedback

KW - Motor learning

KW - Procedural skills training

KW - Simulation-based medical education

KW - Technical skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899021206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899021206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10459-013-9462-8

DO - 10.1007/s10459-013-9462-8

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 251

EP - 272

JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education

JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education

SN - 1382-4996

IS - 2

ER -