Federal funding for endoscopic research in the United States: 2003-2008

Mohamed O. Othman, Michael B. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives:Endoscopic research is underfunded compared with other areas of research. In 2003 we evaluated trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for endoscopic research from 1972 through 2002. Here, we update those trends for 2003-2008.Methods:We calculated the number of federally funded endoscopic research grants and classified them as primary or secondary. Endoscopy funding was compared with other funding for the same period.Results:From 2003 through 2008, the NIH funded 76 primary and 114 secondary endoscopy grants. R01 grants accounted for 25% of these. Colorectal cancer research and imaging and advanced optical technology received most of the grants. More primary endoscopic grants were funded than Helicobacter pylori research grants or cardiac catheterization grants. The number of funded endoscopic grants was not different between the periods 1972-2002 and 2003-2008.Conclusions:Endoscopic research remains underfunded compared with other areas of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-182
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume106
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Organized Financing
Research
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Endoscopy
Optical Imaging
Cardiac Catheterization
Helicobacter pylori
Colorectal Neoplasms
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Federal funding for endoscopic research in the United States : 2003-2008. / Othman, Mohamed O.; Wallace, Michael B.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 106, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 178-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Othman, Mohamed O. ; Wallace, Michael B. / Federal funding for endoscopic research in the United States : 2003-2008. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011 ; Vol. 106, No. 2. pp. 178-182.
@article{82d0582aba0045149bf7deee25f63ad0,
title = "Federal funding for endoscopic research in the United States: 2003-2008",
abstract = "Objectives:Endoscopic research is underfunded compared with other areas of research. In 2003 we evaluated trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for endoscopic research from 1972 through 2002. Here, we update those trends for 2003-2008.Methods:We calculated the number of federally funded endoscopic research grants and classified them as primary or secondary. Endoscopy funding was compared with other funding for the same period.Results:From 2003 through 2008, the NIH funded 76 primary and 114 secondary endoscopy grants. R01 grants accounted for 25{\%} of these. Colorectal cancer research and imaging and advanced optical technology received most of the grants. More primary endoscopic grants were funded than Helicobacter pylori research grants or cardiac catheterization grants. The number of funded endoscopic grants was not different between the periods 1972-2002 and 2003-2008.Conclusions:Endoscopic research remains underfunded compared with other areas of research.",
author = "Othman, {Mohamed O.} and Wallace, {Michael B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2010.302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "178--182",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Federal funding for endoscopic research in the United States

T2 - 2003-2008

AU - Othman, Mohamed O.

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Objectives:Endoscopic research is underfunded compared with other areas of research. In 2003 we evaluated trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for endoscopic research from 1972 through 2002. Here, we update those trends for 2003-2008.Methods:We calculated the number of federally funded endoscopic research grants and classified them as primary or secondary. Endoscopy funding was compared with other funding for the same period.Results:From 2003 through 2008, the NIH funded 76 primary and 114 secondary endoscopy grants. R01 grants accounted for 25% of these. Colorectal cancer research and imaging and advanced optical technology received most of the grants. More primary endoscopic grants were funded than Helicobacter pylori research grants or cardiac catheterization grants. The number of funded endoscopic grants was not different between the periods 1972-2002 and 2003-2008.Conclusions:Endoscopic research remains underfunded compared with other areas of research.

AB - Objectives:Endoscopic research is underfunded compared with other areas of research. In 2003 we evaluated trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for endoscopic research from 1972 through 2002. Here, we update those trends for 2003-2008.Methods:We calculated the number of federally funded endoscopic research grants and classified them as primary or secondary. Endoscopy funding was compared with other funding for the same period.Results:From 2003 through 2008, the NIH funded 76 primary and 114 secondary endoscopy grants. R01 grants accounted for 25% of these. Colorectal cancer research and imaging and advanced optical technology received most of the grants. More primary endoscopic grants were funded than Helicobacter pylori research grants or cardiac catheterization grants. The number of funded endoscopic grants was not different between the periods 1972-2002 and 2003-2008.Conclusions:Endoscopic research remains underfunded compared with other areas of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751484427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751484427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2010.302

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2010.302

M3 - Article

C2 - 21301446

AN - SCOPUS:79751484427

VL - 106

SP - 178

EP - 182

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 2

ER -