TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of Extracting Meaningful Patient Centered Outcomes From the Electronic Health Record Following Critical Illness in the Elderly
AU - Ahmad, Sumera R.
AU - Tarabochia, Alex D.
AU - Budahn, Luann
AU - Lemahieu, Allison M.
AU - Anderson, Brenda
AU - Vashistha, Kirtivardhan
AU - Karnatovskaia, Lioudmila
AU - Gajic, Ognjen
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Small Grant Award, Mayo Clinic PI SA, FP00100342 and Critical Care Research Subcommittee, Mayo Clinic PI SA, Company 300, PAU 43306.
Funding Information:
The authors thank Kimberly Evans, RRT, Anesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit for the automated retrieval of patients and Amy Spitzner, RN, for manual data extraction using EPIC.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Ahmad, Tarabochia, Budahn, Lemahieu, Anderson, Vashistha, Karnatovskaia and Gajic.
PY - 2022/6/6
Y1 - 2022/6/6
N2 - Background: Meaningful patient centered outcomes of critical illness such as functional status, cognition and mental health are studied using validated measurement tools that may often be impractical outside the research setting. The Electronic health record (EHR) contains a plethora of information pertaining to these domains. We sought to determine how feasible and reliable it is to assess meaningful patient centered outcomes from the EHR. Methods: Two independent investigators reviewed EHR of a random sample of ICU patients looking at documented assessments of trajectory of functional status, cognition, and mental health. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement between 2 reviewers. Post ICU health in these domains 12 month after admission was compared to pre- ICU health in the 12 months prior to assess qualitatively whether a patient's condition was “better,” “unchanged” or “worse.” Days alive and out of hospital/health care facility was a secondary outcome. Results: Thirty six of the 41 randomly selected patients (88%) survived critical illness. EHR contained sufficient information to determine the difference in health status before and after critical illness in most survivors (86%). Decline in functional status (36%), cognition (11%), and mental health (11%) following ICU admission was observed compared to premorbid baseline. Agreement between reviewers was excellent (kappa ranging from 0.966 to 1). Eighteen patients (44%) remained home after discharge from hospital and rehabilitation during the 12- month follow up. Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of assessing the trajectory of changes in functional status, cognition, and selected mental health outcomes from EHR of critically ill patients. If validated in a larger, representative sample, these outcomes could be used alongside survival in quality improvement studies and pragmatic clinical trials.
AB - Background: Meaningful patient centered outcomes of critical illness such as functional status, cognition and mental health are studied using validated measurement tools that may often be impractical outside the research setting. The Electronic health record (EHR) contains a plethora of information pertaining to these domains. We sought to determine how feasible and reliable it is to assess meaningful patient centered outcomes from the EHR. Methods: Two independent investigators reviewed EHR of a random sample of ICU patients looking at documented assessments of trajectory of functional status, cognition, and mental health. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement between 2 reviewers. Post ICU health in these domains 12 month after admission was compared to pre- ICU health in the 12 months prior to assess qualitatively whether a patient's condition was “better,” “unchanged” or “worse.” Days alive and out of hospital/health care facility was a secondary outcome. Results: Thirty six of the 41 randomly selected patients (88%) survived critical illness. EHR contained sufficient information to determine the difference in health status before and after critical illness in most survivors (86%). Decline in functional status (36%), cognition (11%), and mental health (11%) following ICU admission was observed compared to premorbid baseline. Agreement between reviewers was excellent (kappa ranging from 0.966 to 1). Eighteen patients (44%) remained home after discharge from hospital and rehabilitation during the 12- month follow up. Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of assessing the trajectory of changes in functional status, cognition, and selected mental health outcomes from EHR of critically ill patients. If validated in a larger, representative sample, these outcomes could be used alongside survival in quality improvement studies and pragmatic clinical trials.
KW - critical illness
KW - days alive and out of hospital/health care facility (DAOH)
KW - electronic health records (EHR)
KW - patient important outcomes
KW - trajectory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133405073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133405073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmed.2022.826169
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2022.826169
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133405073
SN - 2296-858X
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Medicine
M1 - 826169
ER -