Feasibility and validation of a computer-automated Columbia-Suicide severity rating scale using interactive voice response technology

James C. Mundt, John H. Greist, Alan J. Gelenberg, David J Katzelnick, James W. Jefferson, Jack G. Modell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a computer-automated version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) using interactive voice response technology (eC-SSRS™). The eC-SSRS assesses " Lifetime" ideations and behaviors at baseline and monitors suicidality prospectively thereafter. Ten control volunteers and ten psychiatric inpatients participated and were administered the C-SSRS at baseline and 4-8 days later by two experienced clinical trial raters. Study participants also completed the eC-SSRS using touch-tone telephones. Kappa measures of agreement compared inter-rater reliability of the C-SSRS administrations and the C-SSRS administrations with the eC-SSRS. Convergent validity with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation BSS and patient feedback forms were also evaluated. Twenty baseline and nineteen follow-up assessments were completed. In general, agreement between the eC-SSRS and each rater was comparable or superior to the agreement between both raters. Subject feedback and personal preferences varied across individuals, but were generally supportive of the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS. The reliability and validity of the C-SSRS and eC-SSRS for assessing suicidal ideation and behaviors were comparable in this first study comparing the methods. These data were obtained from relatively small patient samples recruited from a single investigational site over a relatively short follow-up period. They support the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS for prospective monitoring of suicidality for use in clinical trials or clinical care, but further research with larger samples, other patient populations, and longer follow-up periods is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1224-1228
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume44
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Suicide
Technology
Clinical Trials
Suicidal Ideation
Touch
Telephone
Reproducibility of Results
Psychiatry
Inpatients
Volunteers
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Interactive voice response (IVR)
  • Methodology
  • Patient Safety
  • Suicide assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Feasibility and validation of a computer-automated Columbia-Suicide severity rating scale using interactive voice response technology. / Mundt, James C.; Greist, John H.; Gelenberg, Alan J.; Katzelnick, David J; Jefferson, James W.; Modell, Jack G.

In: Journal of Psychiatric Research, Vol. 44, No. 16, 12.2010, p. 1224-1228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mundt, James C. ; Greist, John H. ; Gelenberg, Alan J. ; Katzelnick, David J ; Jefferson, James W. ; Modell, Jack G. / Feasibility and validation of a computer-automated Columbia-Suicide severity rating scale using interactive voice response technology. In: Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2010 ; Vol. 44, No. 16. pp. 1224-1228.
@article{14fbad6d30d24432863f795433903ac7,
title = "Feasibility and validation of a computer-automated Columbia-Suicide severity rating scale using interactive voice response technology",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate a computer-automated version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) using interactive voice response technology (eC-SSRS™). The eC-SSRS assesses {"} Lifetime{"} ideations and behaviors at baseline and monitors suicidality prospectively thereafter. Ten control volunteers and ten psychiatric inpatients participated and were administered the C-SSRS at baseline and 4-8 days later by two experienced clinical trial raters. Study participants also completed the eC-SSRS using touch-tone telephones. Kappa measures of agreement compared inter-rater reliability of the C-SSRS administrations and the C-SSRS administrations with the eC-SSRS. Convergent validity with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation BSS and patient feedback forms were also evaluated. Twenty baseline and nineteen follow-up assessments were completed. In general, agreement between the eC-SSRS and each rater was comparable or superior to the agreement between both raters. Subject feedback and personal preferences varied across individuals, but were generally supportive of the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS. The reliability and validity of the C-SSRS and eC-SSRS for assessing suicidal ideation and behaviors were comparable in this first study comparing the methods. These data were obtained from relatively small patient samples recruited from a single investigational site over a relatively short follow-up period. They support the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS for prospective monitoring of suicidality for use in clinical trials or clinical care, but further research with larger samples, other patient populations, and longer follow-up periods is needed.",
keywords = "Depression, Interactive voice response (IVR), Methodology, Patient Safety, Suicide assessment",
author = "Mundt, {James C.} and Greist, {John H.} and Gelenberg, {Alan J.} and Katzelnick, {David J} and Jefferson, {James W.} and Modell, {Jack G.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1224--1228",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric Research",
issn = "0022-3956",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and validation of a computer-automated Columbia-Suicide severity rating scale using interactive voice response technology

AU - Mundt, James C.

AU - Greist, John H.

AU - Gelenberg, Alan J.

AU - Katzelnick, David J

AU - Jefferson, James W.

AU - Modell, Jack G.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Objective: To evaluate a computer-automated version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) using interactive voice response technology (eC-SSRS™). The eC-SSRS assesses " Lifetime" ideations and behaviors at baseline and monitors suicidality prospectively thereafter. Ten control volunteers and ten psychiatric inpatients participated and were administered the C-SSRS at baseline and 4-8 days later by two experienced clinical trial raters. Study participants also completed the eC-SSRS using touch-tone telephones. Kappa measures of agreement compared inter-rater reliability of the C-SSRS administrations and the C-SSRS administrations with the eC-SSRS. Convergent validity with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation BSS and patient feedback forms were also evaluated. Twenty baseline and nineteen follow-up assessments were completed. In general, agreement between the eC-SSRS and each rater was comparable or superior to the agreement between both raters. Subject feedback and personal preferences varied across individuals, but were generally supportive of the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS. The reliability and validity of the C-SSRS and eC-SSRS for assessing suicidal ideation and behaviors were comparable in this first study comparing the methods. These data were obtained from relatively small patient samples recruited from a single investigational site over a relatively short follow-up period. They support the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS for prospective monitoring of suicidality for use in clinical trials or clinical care, but further research with larger samples, other patient populations, and longer follow-up periods is needed.

AB - Objective: To evaluate a computer-automated version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) using interactive voice response technology (eC-SSRS™). The eC-SSRS assesses " Lifetime" ideations and behaviors at baseline and monitors suicidality prospectively thereafter. Ten control volunteers and ten psychiatric inpatients participated and were administered the C-SSRS at baseline and 4-8 days later by two experienced clinical trial raters. Study participants also completed the eC-SSRS using touch-tone telephones. Kappa measures of agreement compared inter-rater reliability of the C-SSRS administrations and the C-SSRS administrations with the eC-SSRS. Convergent validity with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation BSS and patient feedback forms were also evaluated. Twenty baseline and nineteen follow-up assessments were completed. In general, agreement between the eC-SSRS and each rater was comparable or superior to the agreement between both raters. Subject feedback and personal preferences varied across individuals, but were generally supportive of the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS. The reliability and validity of the C-SSRS and eC-SSRS for assessing suicidal ideation and behaviors were comparable in this first study comparing the methods. These data were obtained from relatively small patient samples recruited from a single investigational site over a relatively short follow-up period. They support the feasibility and validity of the eC-SSRS for prospective monitoring of suicidality for use in clinical trials or clinical care, but further research with larger samples, other patient populations, and longer follow-up periods is needed.

KW - Depression

KW - Interactive voice response (IVR)

KW - Methodology

KW - Patient Safety

KW - Suicide assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649713501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649713501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.025

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1224

EP - 1228

JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research

JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research

SN - 0022-3956

IS - 16

ER -