Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia

The application of signal detection theory

Craig Sawchuk, Suzanne A. Meunier, Jeffrey M. Lohr, David H. Westendorf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that individuals with small animal and blood-injection-injury (BII) phobias respond to phobia-relevant stimuli with a combination of fear and disgust. Despite the recognition that disgust may serve a functional role in phobic avoidance behavior, little is known about biased information processing for disgust-related material. Two studies examined recognition memory, using signal detection analyses, for phobia-relevant and general disgust pictures. Study 1 failed to find differences between spider phobics, BII phobics, and nonphobics in discrimination ability (d′) and response bias (c) for spider, surgical, and two categories of general disgust pictures. Results indicated that all participants responded in a liberal manner toward surgical and disgust pictures, whereas they responded more conservatively when judging spider pictures. Study 2 also failed to find differences between BII phobics and nonphobics in discrimination ability and response bias for surgical and disgust pictures presented at 500 and 50ms exposure durations. All participants again adopted a liberal response bias toward surgical and disgust pictures, although only under the 500ms stimulus presentation condition. These results do not suggest the presence of preferential information processing of phobia-relevant or general disgust elicitors among phobic participants. The functional value of disgust-mediated information processing biases is questioned given the available literature. Implications and suggestions for continued information processing research for fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobia are outlined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-510
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Anxiety Disorders
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 6 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Phobic Disorders
Automatic Data Processing
Spiders
Fear
Aptitude
Injections
Wounds and Injuries
Avoidance Learning
Research
Psychological Signal Detection
Specific Phobia
Recognition (Psychology)
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Blood-injection-injury phobias
  • Discrimination ability
  • Response bias
  • Signal detection theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia : The application of signal detection theory. / Sawchuk, Craig; Meunier, Suzanne A.; Lohr, Jeffrey M.; Westendorf, David H.

In: Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 5, 06.09.2002, p. 495-510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sawchuk, Craig ; Meunier, Suzanne A. ; Lohr, Jeffrey M. ; Westendorf, David H. / Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia : The application of signal detection theory. In: Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 495-510.
@article{28ac9a7daf0b4397ac1de6f7a4ca3ab7,
title = "Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia: The application of signal detection theory",
abstract = "A growing body of research suggests that individuals with small animal and blood-injection-injury (BII) phobias respond to phobia-relevant stimuli with a combination of fear and disgust. Despite the recognition that disgust may serve a functional role in phobic avoidance behavior, little is known about biased information processing for disgust-related material. Two studies examined recognition memory, using signal detection analyses, for phobia-relevant and general disgust pictures. Study 1 failed to find differences between spider phobics, BII phobics, and nonphobics in discrimination ability (d′) and response bias (c) for spider, surgical, and two categories of general disgust pictures. Results indicated that all participants responded in a liberal manner toward surgical and disgust pictures, whereas they responded more conservatively when judging spider pictures. Study 2 also failed to find differences between BII phobics and nonphobics in discrimination ability and response bias for surgical and disgust pictures presented at 500 and 50ms exposure durations. All participants again adopted a liberal response bias toward surgical and disgust pictures, although only under the 500ms stimulus presentation condition. These results do not suggest the presence of preferential information processing of phobia-relevant or general disgust elicitors among phobic participants. The functional value of disgust-mediated information processing biases is questioned given the available literature. Implications and suggestions for continued information processing research for fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobia are outlined.",
keywords = "Blood-injection-injury phobias, Discrimination ability, Response bias, Signal detection theory",
author = "Craig Sawchuk and Meunier, {Suzanne A.} and Lohr, {Jeffrey M.} and Westendorf, {David H.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00168-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "495--510",
journal = "Journal of Anxiety Disorders",
issn = "0887-6185",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fear, disgust, and information processing in specific phobia

T2 - The application of signal detection theory

AU - Sawchuk, Craig

AU - Meunier, Suzanne A.

AU - Lohr, Jeffrey M.

AU - Westendorf, David H.

PY - 2002/9/6

Y1 - 2002/9/6

N2 - A growing body of research suggests that individuals with small animal and blood-injection-injury (BII) phobias respond to phobia-relevant stimuli with a combination of fear and disgust. Despite the recognition that disgust may serve a functional role in phobic avoidance behavior, little is known about biased information processing for disgust-related material. Two studies examined recognition memory, using signal detection analyses, for phobia-relevant and general disgust pictures. Study 1 failed to find differences between spider phobics, BII phobics, and nonphobics in discrimination ability (d′) and response bias (c) for spider, surgical, and two categories of general disgust pictures. Results indicated that all participants responded in a liberal manner toward surgical and disgust pictures, whereas they responded more conservatively when judging spider pictures. Study 2 also failed to find differences between BII phobics and nonphobics in discrimination ability and response bias for surgical and disgust pictures presented at 500 and 50ms exposure durations. All participants again adopted a liberal response bias toward surgical and disgust pictures, although only under the 500ms stimulus presentation condition. These results do not suggest the presence of preferential information processing of phobia-relevant or general disgust elicitors among phobic participants. The functional value of disgust-mediated information processing biases is questioned given the available literature. Implications and suggestions for continued information processing research for fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobia are outlined.

AB - A growing body of research suggests that individuals with small animal and blood-injection-injury (BII) phobias respond to phobia-relevant stimuli with a combination of fear and disgust. Despite the recognition that disgust may serve a functional role in phobic avoidance behavior, little is known about biased information processing for disgust-related material. Two studies examined recognition memory, using signal detection analyses, for phobia-relevant and general disgust pictures. Study 1 failed to find differences between spider phobics, BII phobics, and nonphobics in discrimination ability (d′) and response bias (c) for spider, surgical, and two categories of general disgust pictures. Results indicated that all participants responded in a liberal manner toward surgical and disgust pictures, whereas they responded more conservatively when judging spider pictures. Study 2 also failed to find differences between BII phobics and nonphobics in discrimination ability and response bias for surgical and disgust pictures presented at 500 and 50ms exposure durations. All participants again adopted a liberal response bias toward surgical and disgust pictures, although only under the 500ms stimulus presentation condition. These results do not suggest the presence of preferential information processing of phobia-relevant or general disgust elicitors among phobic participants. The functional value of disgust-mediated information processing biases is questioned given the available literature. Implications and suggestions for continued information processing research for fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobia are outlined.

KW - Blood-injection-injury phobias

KW - Discrimination ability

KW - Response bias

KW - Signal detection theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036024686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036024686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00168-8

DO - 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00168-8

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 495

EP - 510

JO - Journal of Anxiety Disorders

JF - Journal of Anxiety Disorders

SN - 0887-6185

IS - 5

ER -