Family medicine panel size with care teams: Impact on quality

Kurt B. Angstman, Jennifer L. Horn, Matthew E. Bernard, Molly M. Kresin, Eric W. Klavetter, Julie Maxson, Floyd Banard Willis, Michael L. Grover, Michael Bryan, Tom D. Thacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The demand for comprehensive primary health care continues to expand. The development of team-based practice allows for improved capacity within a collective, collaborative environment. Our hypothesis was to determine the relationship between panel size and access, quality, patient satisfaction, and cost in a large family medicine group practice using a team-based care model. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 36 family physicians and included total panel size of patients, percentage of time spent on patient care, cost of care, access metrics, diabetic quality metrics, patient satisfaction surveys, and patient care complexity scores. We used linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between adjusted physician panel size, panel complexity, and outcomes. Results: The third available appointments (P < .01) and diabetic quality (P =.03) were negatively affected by increased panel size. Patient satisfaction, cost, and percentage fill rate were not affected by panel size. A physician-adjusted panel size larger than the current mean (2959 patients) was associated with a greater likelihood of poor-quality rankings (≤25th percentile) compared with those with a less than average panel size (odds ratio [OR], 7.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-51.46). Increased panel size was associated with a longer time to the third available appointment (OR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.36-87.26) compared with physicians with panel sizes smaller than the mean. Conclusions: We demonstrated a negative impact of larger panel size on diabetic quality results and available appointment access. Evaluation of a family medicine practice parameters while controlling for panel size and patient complexity may help determine the optimal panel size for a practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)444-451
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Appointments and Schedules
Medicine
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Care
Odds Ratio
Comprehensive Health Care
Confidence Intervals
Group Practice
Family Practice
Family Physicians
Linear Models
Primary Health Care
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Family Physicians
  • Family Practice
  • Group Practice
  • Patient Care
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Primary Health Care
  • Regression Analysis
  • Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Angstman, K. B., Horn, J. L., Bernard, M. E., Kresin, M. M., Klavetter, E. W., Maxson, J., ... Thacher, T. D. (2016). Family medicine panel size with care teams: Impact on quality. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 29(4), 444-451. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150364

Family medicine panel size with care teams : Impact on quality. / Angstman, Kurt B.; Horn, Jennifer L.; Bernard, Matthew E.; Kresin, Molly M.; Klavetter, Eric W.; Maxson, Julie; Willis, Floyd Banard; Grover, Michael L.; Bryan, Michael; Thacher, Tom D.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 444-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Angstman, KB, Horn, JL, Bernard, ME, Kresin, MM, Klavetter, EW, Maxson, J, Willis, FB, Grover, ML, Bryan, M & Thacher, TD 2016, 'Family medicine panel size with care teams: Impact on quality', Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 444-451. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150364
Angstman KB, Horn JL, Bernard ME, Kresin MM, Klavetter EW, Maxson J et al. Family medicine panel size with care teams: Impact on quality. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2016 Jul 1;29(4):444-451. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150364
Angstman, Kurt B. ; Horn, Jennifer L. ; Bernard, Matthew E. ; Kresin, Molly M. ; Klavetter, Eric W. ; Maxson, Julie ; Willis, Floyd Banard ; Grover, Michael L. ; Bryan, Michael ; Thacher, Tom D. / Family medicine panel size with care teams : Impact on quality. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 444-451.
@article{9e32bcfec12f4d0b92f7c334a5e5e43b,
title = "Family medicine panel size with care teams: Impact on quality",
abstract = "Purpose: The demand for comprehensive primary health care continues to expand. The development of team-based practice allows for improved capacity within a collective, collaborative environment. Our hypothesis was to determine the relationship between panel size and access, quality, patient satisfaction, and cost in a large family medicine group practice using a team-based care model. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 36 family physicians and included total panel size of patients, percentage of time spent on patient care, cost of care, access metrics, diabetic quality metrics, patient satisfaction surveys, and patient care complexity scores. We used linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between adjusted physician panel size, panel complexity, and outcomes. Results: The third available appointments (P < .01) and diabetic quality (P =.03) were negatively affected by increased panel size. Patient satisfaction, cost, and percentage fill rate were not affected by panel size. A physician-adjusted panel size larger than the current mean (2959 patients) was associated with a greater likelihood of poor-quality rankings (≤25th percentile) compared with those with a less than average panel size (odds ratio [OR], 7.61; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 1.13-51.46). Increased panel size was associated with a longer time to the third available appointment (OR, 10.9; 95{\%} CI, 1.36-87.26) compared with physicians with panel sizes smaller than the mean. Conclusions: We demonstrated a negative impact of larger panel size on diabetic quality results and available appointment access. Evaluation of a family medicine practice parameters while controlling for panel size and patient complexity may help determine the optimal panel size for a practice.",
keywords = "Diabetes Mellitus, Family Physicians, Family Practice, Group Practice, Patient Care, Patient Satisfaction, Primary Health Care, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies",
author = "Angstman, {Kurt B.} and Horn, {Jennifer L.} and Bernard, {Matthew E.} and Kresin, {Molly M.} and Klavetter, {Eric W.} and Julie Maxson and Willis, {Floyd Banard} and Grover, {Michael L.} and Michael Bryan and Thacher, {Tom D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150364",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "444--451",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family medicine panel size with care teams

T2 - Impact on quality

AU - Angstman, Kurt B.

AU - Horn, Jennifer L.

AU - Bernard, Matthew E.

AU - Kresin, Molly M.

AU - Klavetter, Eric W.

AU - Maxson, Julie

AU - Willis, Floyd Banard

AU - Grover, Michael L.

AU - Bryan, Michael

AU - Thacher, Tom D.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Purpose: The demand for comprehensive primary health care continues to expand. The development of team-based practice allows for improved capacity within a collective, collaborative environment. Our hypothesis was to determine the relationship between panel size and access, quality, patient satisfaction, and cost in a large family medicine group practice using a team-based care model. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 36 family physicians and included total panel size of patients, percentage of time spent on patient care, cost of care, access metrics, diabetic quality metrics, patient satisfaction surveys, and patient care complexity scores. We used linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between adjusted physician panel size, panel complexity, and outcomes. Results: The third available appointments (P < .01) and diabetic quality (P =.03) were negatively affected by increased panel size. Patient satisfaction, cost, and percentage fill rate were not affected by panel size. A physician-adjusted panel size larger than the current mean (2959 patients) was associated with a greater likelihood of poor-quality rankings (≤25th percentile) compared with those with a less than average panel size (odds ratio [OR], 7.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-51.46). Increased panel size was associated with a longer time to the third available appointment (OR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.36-87.26) compared with physicians with panel sizes smaller than the mean. Conclusions: We demonstrated a negative impact of larger panel size on diabetic quality results and available appointment access. Evaluation of a family medicine practice parameters while controlling for panel size and patient complexity may help determine the optimal panel size for a practice.

AB - Purpose: The demand for comprehensive primary health care continues to expand. The development of team-based practice allows for improved capacity within a collective, collaborative environment. Our hypothesis was to determine the relationship between panel size and access, quality, patient satisfaction, and cost in a large family medicine group practice using a team-based care model. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 36 family physicians and included total panel size of patients, percentage of time spent on patient care, cost of care, access metrics, diabetic quality metrics, patient satisfaction surveys, and patient care complexity scores. We used linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between adjusted physician panel size, panel complexity, and outcomes. Results: The third available appointments (P < .01) and diabetic quality (P =.03) were negatively affected by increased panel size. Patient satisfaction, cost, and percentage fill rate were not affected by panel size. A physician-adjusted panel size larger than the current mean (2959 patients) was associated with a greater likelihood of poor-quality rankings (≤25th percentile) compared with those with a less than average panel size (odds ratio [OR], 7.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-51.46). Increased panel size was associated with a longer time to the third available appointment (OR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.36-87.26) compared with physicians with panel sizes smaller than the mean. Conclusions: We demonstrated a negative impact of larger panel size on diabetic quality results and available appointment access. Evaluation of a family medicine practice parameters while controlling for panel size and patient complexity may help determine the optimal panel size for a practice.

KW - Diabetes Mellitus

KW - Family Physicians

KW - Family Practice

KW - Group Practice

KW - Patient Care

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Regression Analysis

KW - Retrospective Studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978823240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978823240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150364

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150364

M3 - Article

C2 - 27390375

AN - SCOPUS:84978823240

VL - 29

SP - 444

EP - 451

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 4

ER -