Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU

A qualitative study

Michael Wilson, Lori Rhudy, Beth A. Ballinger, Ann N. Tescher, Brian W Pickering, Ognjen Gajic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to explore reasons for physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the intensive care unit (ICU) utilizing qualitative methodology. Methods: Single center study consisting of semi-structured interviews with experienced physicians and nurses. Seventeen intensivists from medical (n = 7), surgical (n = 5), and anesthesia (n = 5) critical care backgrounds, and ten nurses from medical (n = 5) and surgical (n = 5) ICU backgrounds were interviewed. Principles of grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts. Results: Eleven factors within four categories were identified that influenced physician variability in decisions to limit life support: (1) physician work environment - workload and competing priorities, shift changes and handoffs, and incorporation of nursing input; (2) physician experiences - of unexpected patient survival, and of limiting life support in physician's family; (3) physician attitudes - investment in a good surgical outcome, specialty perspective, values and beliefs; and (4) physician relationship with patient and family - hearing the patient's wishes firsthand, engagement in family communication, and family negotiation. Conclusions: We identified several factors which physicians and nurses perceived were important sources of physician variability in decisions to limit life support. Ways to raise awareness and ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of factors such as workload, competing priorities, shift changes, and handoffs should be explored. Exposing intensivists to long term patient outcomes, formalizing nursing input, providing additional training, and emphasizing firsthand knowledge of patient wishes may improve decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1009-1018
Number of pages10
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Physicians
Nurses
Workload
Nursing
Interviews
Surgical Specialties
Physician-Patient Relations
Negotiating
Family Physicians
Critical Care
Hearing
Decision Making
Anesthesia
Communication
Survival

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Intensive care
  • Life support care
  • Physician's role
  • Terminal care
  • Withholding treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU : A qualitative study. / Wilson, Michael; Rhudy, Lori; Ballinger, Beth A.; Tescher, Ann N.; Pickering, Brian W; Gajic, Ognjen.

In: Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 1009-1018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{18c154ded13e410f86dd4d3f7fd31dc1,
title = "Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Purpose: Our aim was to explore reasons for physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the intensive care unit (ICU) utilizing qualitative methodology. Methods: Single center study consisting of semi-structured interviews with experienced physicians and nurses. Seventeen intensivists from medical (n = 7), surgical (n = 5), and anesthesia (n = 5) critical care backgrounds, and ten nurses from medical (n = 5) and surgical (n = 5) ICU backgrounds were interviewed. Principles of grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts. Results: Eleven factors within four categories were identified that influenced physician variability in decisions to limit life support: (1) physician work environment - workload and competing priorities, shift changes and handoffs, and incorporation of nursing input; (2) physician experiences - of unexpected patient survival, and of limiting life support in physician's family; (3) physician attitudes - investment in a good surgical outcome, specialty perspective, values and beliefs; and (4) physician relationship with patient and family - hearing the patient's wishes firsthand, engagement in family communication, and family negotiation. Conclusions: We identified several factors which physicians and nurses perceived were important sources of physician variability in decisions to limit life support. Ways to raise awareness and ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of factors such as workload, competing priorities, shift changes, and handoffs should be explored. Exposing intensivists to long term patient outcomes, formalizing nursing input, providing additional training, and emphasizing firsthand knowledge of patient wishes may improve decision making.",
keywords = "Decision making, Intensive care, Life support care, Physician's role, Terminal care, Withholding treatment",
author = "Michael Wilson and Lori Rhudy and Ballinger, {Beth A.} and Tescher, {Ann N.} and Pickering, {Brian W} and Ognjen Gajic",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00134-013-2896-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1009--1018",
journal = "Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0342-4642",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Wilson, Michael

AU - Rhudy, Lori

AU - Ballinger, Beth A.

AU - Tescher, Ann N.

AU - Pickering, Brian W

AU - Gajic, Ognjen

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Purpose: Our aim was to explore reasons for physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the intensive care unit (ICU) utilizing qualitative methodology. Methods: Single center study consisting of semi-structured interviews with experienced physicians and nurses. Seventeen intensivists from medical (n = 7), surgical (n = 5), and anesthesia (n = 5) critical care backgrounds, and ten nurses from medical (n = 5) and surgical (n = 5) ICU backgrounds were interviewed. Principles of grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts. Results: Eleven factors within four categories were identified that influenced physician variability in decisions to limit life support: (1) physician work environment - workload and competing priorities, shift changes and handoffs, and incorporation of nursing input; (2) physician experiences - of unexpected patient survival, and of limiting life support in physician's family; (3) physician attitudes - investment in a good surgical outcome, specialty perspective, values and beliefs; and (4) physician relationship with patient and family - hearing the patient's wishes firsthand, engagement in family communication, and family negotiation. Conclusions: We identified several factors which physicians and nurses perceived were important sources of physician variability in decisions to limit life support. Ways to raise awareness and ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of factors such as workload, competing priorities, shift changes, and handoffs should be explored. Exposing intensivists to long term patient outcomes, formalizing nursing input, providing additional training, and emphasizing firsthand knowledge of patient wishes may improve decision making.

AB - Purpose: Our aim was to explore reasons for physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the intensive care unit (ICU) utilizing qualitative methodology. Methods: Single center study consisting of semi-structured interviews with experienced physicians and nurses. Seventeen intensivists from medical (n = 7), surgical (n = 5), and anesthesia (n = 5) critical care backgrounds, and ten nurses from medical (n = 5) and surgical (n = 5) ICU backgrounds were interviewed. Principles of grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts. Results: Eleven factors within four categories were identified that influenced physician variability in decisions to limit life support: (1) physician work environment - workload and competing priorities, shift changes and handoffs, and incorporation of nursing input; (2) physician experiences - of unexpected patient survival, and of limiting life support in physician's family; (3) physician attitudes - investment in a good surgical outcome, specialty perspective, values and beliefs; and (4) physician relationship with patient and family - hearing the patient's wishes firsthand, engagement in family communication, and family negotiation. Conclusions: We identified several factors which physicians and nurses perceived were important sources of physician variability in decisions to limit life support. Ways to raise awareness and ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of factors such as workload, competing priorities, shift changes, and handoffs should be explored. Exposing intensivists to long term patient outcomes, formalizing nursing input, providing additional training, and emphasizing firsthand knowledge of patient wishes may improve decision making.

KW - Decision making

KW - Intensive care

KW - Life support care

KW - Physician's role

KW - Terminal care

KW - Withholding treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878016240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878016240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00134-013-2896-x

DO - 10.1007/s00134-013-2896-x

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1009

EP - 1018

JO - Intensive Care Medicine

JF - Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0342-4642

IS - 6

ER -