Factors of biological risk and reserve associated with executive behaviors in children and adolescents with spina bifida myelomeningocele

Tanya Maines Brown, M. Douglas Ris, Dean Beebe, Robert T. Ammerman, Sonya G. Oppenheimer, Keith Owen Yeates, Benedicta G. Enrile

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined differences between healthy children (n = 35) and those with spina bifida myelomeningocele (SBM; n = 42) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), a measure of executive function behaviors. It also examined whether aspects of biological risk associated with SBM and reserve factors within the family could account for variability in BRIEF scores for children and adolescents with SBM. Patients in the SBM group exhibited more problems than both published norms and a local comparison group of healthy children in metacognition but not behavior regulation. Behavior regulation problems in children with SBM were predicted by parent psychological distress. More shunt-related surgeries and history of seizures predicted poorer metacognitive abilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-134
Number of pages17
JournalChild Neuropsychology
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Factors of biological risk and reserve associated with executive behaviors in children and adolescents with spina bifida myelomeningocele'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this