Facilitated process improvement: An approach to the seamless linkage between evidence and practice in CKD

David B. Matchar, Meenal B. Patwardhan, Gregory P. Samsa, William E Haley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Two common strategies for guideline implementation are preformed practice improvement tools, such as flowcharts, and process reengineering by total quality management (TQM) teams. Prespecified tools fail to accommodate local circumstances, TQM requires an unrealistic level of local commitment, and neither has a proven track record for success. Methods: We describe an alternative approach termed facilitated process improvement (FPI), a systematic exploration of potential modifications to systems of care, and its application to the implementation of an evidence-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) guideline, focusing on individuals not yet requiring renal replacement therapy. The FPI steps followed by the implementation work group to develop a set of implementation tools for the Renal Physicians Association Advanced CKD Guideline included: (1) developing functional specifications of processes, including actions and prerequisites required; (2) investigating processes of care in a variety of site types to understand processes and reasons for failures; (3) developing practical tools corresponding to root causes of failures of processes and subprocesses; and (4) developing a meta-tool to tailor local selection of tools. Results: Formal needs assessment identified processes of care related to 3 major tasks: identify patients, develop and communicate patient-specific management plan, and implement plan. Subtasks were identified to address root causes of failures, and, for each, tools were modified from existing or developed de novo by the work group, which further developed an organized management approach that uses 4 categories of tools: (1) assessment tools identify opportunities for improvements; (2) tailoring tools, a unique feature of this approach, determine which tools are applicable; (3) implementation tools identify patients and communicate and implement management plan; and (4) evaluation tools assess the impact of implementation. Conclusion: The work group, in collaboration with community clinicians, patients, and CKD and tool experts, developed and used FPI to provide a range of tools in a fashion that supports and simplifies local assessment, tailoring, implementation, and evaluation. With the formative work completed, practitioners whose practice improvement experience level and other resources may be limited will find it more feasible and practical to provide optimal advanced CKD management without the demands of conventional TQM or continuous quality improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)528-538
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Total Quality Management
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Guidelines
Software Design
Renal Replacement Therapy
Needs Assessment
Disease Management
Quality Improvement
Physicians
Kidney

Keywords

  • Chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • Clinical guidelines
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Practice improvement
  • Total quality management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Nephrology

Cite this

Facilitated process improvement : An approach to the seamless linkage between evidence and practice in CKD. / Matchar, David B.; Patwardhan, Meenal B.; Samsa, Gregory P.; Haley, William E.

In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol. 47, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 528-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matchar, David B. ; Patwardhan, Meenal B. ; Samsa, Gregory P. ; Haley, William E. / Facilitated process improvement : An approach to the seamless linkage between evidence and practice in CKD. In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2006 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 528-538.
@article{503bb7edff894063bc4b4f1d8414c296,
title = "Facilitated process improvement: An approach to the seamless linkage between evidence and practice in CKD",
abstract = "Background: Two common strategies for guideline implementation are preformed practice improvement tools, such as flowcharts, and process reengineering by total quality management (TQM) teams. Prespecified tools fail to accommodate local circumstances, TQM requires an unrealistic level of local commitment, and neither has a proven track record for success. Methods: We describe an alternative approach termed facilitated process improvement (FPI), a systematic exploration of potential modifications to systems of care, and its application to the implementation of an evidence-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) guideline, focusing on individuals not yet requiring renal replacement therapy. The FPI steps followed by the implementation work group to develop a set of implementation tools for the Renal Physicians Association Advanced CKD Guideline included: (1) developing functional specifications of processes, including actions and prerequisites required; (2) investigating processes of care in a variety of site types to understand processes and reasons for failures; (3) developing practical tools corresponding to root causes of failures of processes and subprocesses; and (4) developing a meta-tool to tailor local selection of tools. Results: Formal needs assessment identified processes of care related to 3 major tasks: identify patients, develop and communicate patient-specific management plan, and implement plan. Subtasks were identified to address root causes of failures, and, for each, tools were modified from existing or developed de novo by the work group, which further developed an organized management approach that uses 4 categories of tools: (1) assessment tools identify opportunities for improvements; (2) tailoring tools, a unique feature of this approach, determine which tools are applicable; (3) implementation tools identify patients and communicate and implement management plan; and (4) evaluation tools assess the impact of implementation. Conclusion: The work group, in collaboration with community clinicians, patients, and CKD and tool experts, developed and used FPI to provide a range of tools in a fashion that supports and simplifies local assessment, tailoring, implementation, and evaluation. With the formative work completed, practitioners whose practice improvement experience level and other resources may be limited will find it more feasible and practical to provide optimal advanced CKD management without the demands of conventional TQM or continuous quality improvement.",
keywords = "Chronic kidney disease (CKD), Clinical guidelines, Evidence-based medicine, Practice improvement, Total quality management",
author = "Matchar, {David B.} and Patwardhan, {Meenal B.} and Samsa, {Gregory P.} and Haley, {William E}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "528--538",
journal = "American Journal of Kidney Diseases",
issn = "0272-6386",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitated process improvement

T2 - An approach to the seamless linkage between evidence and practice in CKD

AU - Matchar, David B.

AU - Patwardhan, Meenal B.

AU - Samsa, Gregory P.

AU - Haley, William E

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Background: Two common strategies for guideline implementation are preformed practice improvement tools, such as flowcharts, and process reengineering by total quality management (TQM) teams. Prespecified tools fail to accommodate local circumstances, TQM requires an unrealistic level of local commitment, and neither has a proven track record for success. Methods: We describe an alternative approach termed facilitated process improvement (FPI), a systematic exploration of potential modifications to systems of care, and its application to the implementation of an evidence-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) guideline, focusing on individuals not yet requiring renal replacement therapy. The FPI steps followed by the implementation work group to develop a set of implementation tools for the Renal Physicians Association Advanced CKD Guideline included: (1) developing functional specifications of processes, including actions and prerequisites required; (2) investigating processes of care in a variety of site types to understand processes and reasons for failures; (3) developing practical tools corresponding to root causes of failures of processes and subprocesses; and (4) developing a meta-tool to tailor local selection of tools. Results: Formal needs assessment identified processes of care related to 3 major tasks: identify patients, develop and communicate patient-specific management plan, and implement plan. Subtasks were identified to address root causes of failures, and, for each, tools were modified from existing or developed de novo by the work group, which further developed an organized management approach that uses 4 categories of tools: (1) assessment tools identify opportunities for improvements; (2) tailoring tools, a unique feature of this approach, determine which tools are applicable; (3) implementation tools identify patients and communicate and implement management plan; and (4) evaluation tools assess the impact of implementation. Conclusion: The work group, in collaboration with community clinicians, patients, and CKD and tool experts, developed and used FPI to provide a range of tools in a fashion that supports and simplifies local assessment, tailoring, implementation, and evaluation. With the formative work completed, practitioners whose practice improvement experience level and other resources may be limited will find it more feasible and practical to provide optimal advanced CKD management without the demands of conventional TQM or continuous quality improvement.

AB - Background: Two common strategies for guideline implementation are preformed practice improvement tools, such as flowcharts, and process reengineering by total quality management (TQM) teams. Prespecified tools fail to accommodate local circumstances, TQM requires an unrealistic level of local commitment, and neither has a proven track record for success. Methods: We describe an alternative approach termed facilitated process improvement (FPI), a systematic exploration of potential modifications to systems of care, and its application to the implementation of an evidence-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) guideline, focusing on individuals not yet requiring renal replacement therapy. The FPI steps followed by the implementation work group to develop a set of implementation tools for the Renal Physicians Association Advanced CKD Guideline included: (1) developing functional specifications of processes, including actions and prerequisites required; (2) investigating processes of care in a variety of site types to understand processes and reasons for failures; (3) developing practical tools corresponding to root causes of failures of processes and subprocesses; and (4) developing a meta-tool to tailor local selection of tools. Results: Formal needs assessment identified processes of care related to 3 major tasks: identify patients, develop and communicate patient-specific management plan, and implement plan. Subtasks were identified to address root causes of failures, and, for each, tools were modified from existing or developed de novo by the work group, which further developed an organized management approach that uses 4 categories of tools: (1) assessment tools identify opportunities for improvements; (2) tailoring tools, a unique feature of this approach, determine which tools are applicable; (3) implementation tools identify patients and communicate and implement management plan; and (4) evaluation tools assess the impact of implementation. Conclusion: The work group, in collaboration with community clinicians, patients, and CKD and tool experts, developed and used FPI to provide a range of tools in a fashion that supports and simplifies local assessment, tailoring, implementation, and evaluation. With the formative work completed, practitioners whose practice improvement experience level and other resources may be limited will find it more feasible and practical to provide optimal advanced CKD management without the demands of conventional TQM or continuous quality improvement.

KW - Chronic kidney disease (CKD)

KW - Clinical guidelines

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Practice improvement

KW - Total quality management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32844454630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32844454630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.016

DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 16490633

AN - SCOPUS:32844454630

VL - 47

SP - 528

EP - 538

JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

SN - 0272-6386

IS - 3

ER -