External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness: a brief primer

Mohammad H Murad, Abdulrahman Katabi, Raed Benkhadra, Victor Manuel Montori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

External validity is a construct that attempts to answer the question of whether we can use the results of a study in patients other than those enrolled in the study. External validity consists of two unique underlying concepts, generalisability and applicability. When the concern is about extending the results from a sample to the population from which the sample was drawn, the problem is one of generalisability. When the concern is about using inferences drawn from study participants in the care of specific patients belonging to any population, the problem is one of applicability. Clinicians, guideline developers and policymakers do not struggle with generalisability, but often struggle with applicability. When applicability is deemed to be low for a certain population, certainty in the supporting evidence becomes low due to indirectness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-19
Number of pages3
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Population
Patient Care
Guidelines

Keywords

  • public health
  • quality in health care

Cite this

External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness : a brief primer. / Murad, Mohammad H; Katabi, Abdulrahman; Benkhadra, Raed; Montori, Victor Manuel.

In: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 17-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{42926fa936d748c38875c13dd700bfd7,
title = "External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness: a brief primer",
abstract = "External validity is a construct that attempts to answer the question of whether we can use the results of a study in patients other than those enrolled in the study. External validity consists of two unique underlying concepts, generalisability and applicability. When the concern is about extending the results from a sample to the population from which the sample was drawn, the problem is one of generalisability. When the concern is about using inferences drawn from study participants in the care of specific patients belonging to any population, the problem is one of applicability. Clinicians, guideline developers and policymakers do not struggle with generalisability, but often struggle with applicability. When applicability is deemed to be low for a certain population, certainty in the supporting evidence becomes low due to indirectness.",
keywords = "public health, quality in health care",
author = "Murad, {Mohammad H} and Abdulrahman Katabi and Raed Benkhadra and Montori, {Victor Manuel}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/ebmed-2017-110800",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "17--19",
journal = "BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "2515-446X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness

T2 - a brief primer

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Katabi, Abdulrahman

AU - Benkhadra, Raed

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - External validity is a construct that attempts to answer the question of whether we can use the results of a study in patients other than those enrolled in the study. External validity consists of two unique underlying concepts, generalisability and applicability. When the concern is about extending the results from a sample to the population from which the sample was drawn, the problem is one of generalisability. When the concern is about using inferences drawn from study participants in the care of specific patients belonging to any population, the problem is one of applicability. Clinicians, guideline developers and policymakers do not struggle with generalisability, but often struggle with applicability. When applicability is deemed to be low for a certain population, certainty in the supporting evidence becomes low due to indirectness.

AB - External validity is a construct that attempts to answer the question of whether we can use the results of a study in patients other than those enrolled in the study. External validity consists of two unique underlying concepts, generalisability and applicability. When the concern is about extending the results from a sample to the population from which the sample was drawn, the problem is one of generalisability. When the concern is about using inferences drawn from study participants in the care of specific patients belonging to any population, the problem is one of applicability. Clinicians, guideline developers and policymakers do not struggle with generalisability, but often struggle with applicability. When applicability is deemed to be low for a certain population, certainty in the supporting evidence becomes low due to indirectness.

KW - public health

KW - quality in health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057074038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057074038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110800

DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110800

M3 - Article

C2 - 29367319

AN - SCOPUS:85057074038

VL - 23

SP - 17

EP - 19

JO - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 2515-446X

IS - 1

ER -