Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable

Jamie Murphy, Tonia Young-Fadok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extended lymphadenectomy has gained considerable attention as an adjunct to conventional colon cancer surgery with the hope that it may potentially decrease local recurrence rates and improve cancer-specific outcome measures. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding these techniques, it is difficult to establish any additional survival benefit associated with more comprehensive lymphadenectomy strategies when these are performed in addition to conventional colon cancer surgery. Furthermore, these techniques remain unproven by large randomized clinical trials. The appropriate indications for performing extended lymphadenectomy also remain unclear, and there is a lack of standardization with regard to surgical technique. Moreover, there are a number of confounding factors that frequently receive little attention when oncological outcome measures are reported following extended lymphadenectomy in the setting of colon cancer. The purpose of this review is to outline these confounding issues and discuss their impact on reports describing cancer-specific outcome measures following the use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques. Furthermore, this review proposes that in light of the available published evidence, the role of radical lymphadenectomy is currently unproven, with large randomized clinical trials required in the future to determine whether there is a survival benefit for colon cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1799-1807
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Lymph Node Excision
Colonic Neoplasms
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Randomized Controlled Trials
Survival
Neoplasms
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable. / Murphy, Jamie; Young-Fadok, Tonia.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 1799-1807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Jamie ; Young-Fadok, Tonia. / Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 37, No. 8. pp. 1799-1807.
@article{469a48fbe6144294be3717fecac9b308,
title = "Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable",
abstract = "Extended lymphadenectomy has gained considerable attention as an adjunct to conventional colon cancer surgery with the hope that it may potentially decrease local recurrence rates and improve cancer-specific outcome measures. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding these techniques, it is difficult to establish any additional survival benefit associated with more comprehensive lymphadenectomy strategies when these are performed in addition to conventional colon cancer surgery. Furthermore, these techniques remain unproven by large randomized clinical trials. The appropriate indications for performing extended lymphadenectomy also remain unclear, and there is a lack of standardization with regard to surgical technique. Moreover, there are a number of confounding factors that frequently receive little attention when oncological outcome measures are reported following extended lymphadenectomy in the setting of colon cancer. The purpose of this review is to outline these confounding issues and discuss their impact on reports describing cancer-specific outcome measures following the use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques. Furthermore, this review proposes that in light of the available published evidence, the role of radical lymphadenectomy is currently unproven, with large randomized clinical trials required in the future to determine whether there is a survival benefit for colon cancer patients.",
author = "Jamie Murphy and Tonia Young-Fadok",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-013-2071-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1799--1807",
journal = "Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable

AU - Murphy, Jamie

AU - Young-Fadok, Tonia

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Extended lymphadenectomy has gained considerable attention as an adjunct to conventional colon cancer surgery with the hope that it may potentially decrease local recurrence rates and improve cancer-specific outcome measures. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding these techniques, it is difficult to establish any additional survival benefit associated with more comprehensive lymphadenectomy strategies when these are performed in addition to conventional colon cancer surgery. Furthermore, these techniques remain unproven by large randomized clinical trials. The appropriate indications for performing extended lymphadenectomy also remain unclear, and there is a lack of standardization with regard to surgical technique. Moreover, there are a number of confounding factors that frequently receive little attention when oncological outcome measures are reported following extended lymphadenectomy in the setting of colon cancer. The purpose of this review is to outline these confounding issues and discuss their impact on reports describing cancer-specific outcome measures following the use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques. Furthermore, this review proposes that in light of the available published evidence, the role of radical lymphadenectomy is currently unproven, with large randomized clinical trials required in the future to determine whether there is a survival benefit for colon cancer patients.

AB - Extended lymphadenectomy has gained considerable attention as an adjunct to conventional colon cancer surgery with the hope that it may potentially decrease local recurrence rates and improve cancer-specific outcome measures. Despite the enthusiasm surrounding these techniques, it is difficult to establish any additional survival benefit associated with more comprehensive lymphadenectomy strategies when these are performed in addition to conventional colon cancer surgery. Furthermore, these techniques remain unproven by large randomized clinical trials. The appropriate indications for performing extended lymphadenectomy also remain unclear, and there is a lack of standardization with regard to surgical technique. Moreover, there are a number of confounding factors that frequently receive little attention when oncological outcome measures are reported following extended lymphadenectomy in the setting of colon cancer. The purpose of this review is to outline these confounding issues and discuss their impact on reports describing cancer-specific outcome measures following the use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques. Furthermore, this review proposes that in light of the available published evidence, the role of radical lymphadenectomy is currently unproven, with large randomized clinical trials required in the future to determine whether there is a survival benefit for colon cancer patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880818075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880818075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-013-2071-0

DO - 10.1007/s00268-013-2071-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 23652354

AN - SCOPUS:84880818075

VL - 37

SP - 1799

EP - 1807

JO - Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference

JF - Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 8

ER -