Abstract
Sargent et al (J Clin Oncol 23: 8664-8670, 2005) concluded that 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) can be considered a valid surrogate (replacement) endpoint for 5-year overall survival (OS) in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. We address the question whether the conclusion holds for trials involving other classes of treatments than those considered by Sargent et al. Additionally, we assess if the 3-year cutpoint is an optimal one. To this aim, we investigate whether the results reported by Sargent et al. could have been used to predict treatment effects in three centrally randomized adjuvant colorectal cancer trials performed by the Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment for Cancer (JFMTC) (Sakamoto et al. J Clin Oncol 22:484-492, 2004). Our analysis supports the conclusion of Sargent et al. and shows that using DFS at 2 or 3 years would be the best option for the prediction of OS at 5 years.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 54-64 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Lifetime Data Analysis |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2008 |
Keywords
- Colorectal cancer
- Surrogate endpoint
- Surrogate threshold effect
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Mathematics