Evidence maps: A tool to guide research agenda setting

Fares Alahdab, Mohammad H Murad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A surprisingly huge proportion of medical research still shows poor quality in design, conduct and analysis, leading to far from optimal robustness of findings and validity of conclusions. Research waste remains a problem caused by a number of reasons. Asking the wrong research questions and ignoring the existing evidence are possible preventable ones. Evidence maps are tools that may aid in guiding clinical investigators and help in agenda setting of future research. In this article, we explain how they serve such a goal and outline the steps required to build effective evidence maps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Research
Biomedical Research
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • evidence maps
  • evidence synthesis
  • reporting
  • research agenda
  • research questions
  • research waste
  • reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evidence maps : A tool to guide research agenda setting. / Alahdab, Fares; Murad, Mohammad H.

In: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{081fc3f67a4042dc8522654012612970,
title = "Evidence maps: A tool to guide research agenda setting",
abstract = "A surprisingly huge proportion of medical research still shows poor quality in design, conduct and analysis, leading to far from optimal robustness of findings and validity of conclusions. Research waste remains a problem caused by a number of reasons. Asking the wrong research questions and ignoring the existing evidence are possible preventable ones. Evidence maps are tools that may aid in guiding clinical investigators and help in agenda setting of future research. In this article, we explain how they serve such a goal and outline the steps required to build effective evidence maps.",
keywords = "evidence maps, evidence synthesis, reporting, research agenda, research questions, research waste, reviews",
author = "Fares Alahdab and Murad, {Mohammad H}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111137",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "2515-446X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence maps

T2 - A tool to guide research agenda setting

AU - Alahdab, Fares

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A surprisingly huge proportion of medical research still shows poor quality in design, conduct and analysis, leading to far from optimal robustness of findings and validity of conclusions. Research waste remains a problem caused by a number of reasons. Asking the wrong research questions and ignoring the existing evidence are possible preventable ones. Evidence maps are tools that may aid in guiding clinical investigators and help in agenda setting of future research. In this article, we explain how they serve such a goal and outline the steps required to build effective evidence maps.

AB - A surprisingly huge proportion of medical research still shows poor quality in design, conduct and analysis, leading to far from optimal robustness of findings and validity of conclusions. Research waste remains a problem caused by a number of reasons. Asking the wrong research questions and ignoring the existing evidence are possible preventable ones. Evidence maps are tools that may aid in guiding clinical investigators and help in agenda setting of future research. In this article, we explain how they serve such a goal and outline the steps required to build effective evidence maps.

KW - evidence maps

KW - evidence synthesis

KW - reporting

KW - research agenda

KW - research questions

KW - research waste

KW - reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061738103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061738103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111137

DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111137

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061738103

JO - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 2515-446X

ER -