Evidence-based wound classification for vulvar surgery: Implications for risk adjustment

I. Mert, William Arthur Cliby, K. A. Bews, E. B. Habermann, Sean Christopher Dowdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification. Methods: Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed. Results: Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6%), 364 (17.2%), and 407 (19.2%) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4%; type II: 3.8%, type III: 6.8%; type IV 10.6%; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3%, type II: 3.0%; type III: 3.2%; type IV: 0%; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0%, type II: 10.1%; type III: 14.3%; type IV: 20.0%; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1% vs 10.6%, p = 0.87). Conclusion: Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGynecologic oncology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Risk Adjustment
Surgical Wound Infection
Wounds and Injuries
Hysterectomy
Quality Improvement
Infection
Lymph Node Excision
Laparotomy

Keywords

  • NSQIP database
  • Surgical site infection
  • Vulvar surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Evidence-based wound classification for vulvar surgery : Implications for risk adjustment. / Mert, I.; Cliby, William Arthur; Bews, K. A.; Habermann, E. B.; Dowdy, Sean Christopher.

In: Gynecologic oncology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ea9fbc5e3e04b4081766f8e1c1fb121,
title = "Evidence-based wound classification for vulvar surgery: Implications for risk adjustment",
abstract = "Objectives: The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification. Methods: Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed. Results: Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6{\%}), 364 (17.2{\%}), and 407 (19.2{\%}) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6{\%} vs. 3.8{\%}; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4{\%}; type II: 3.8{\%}, type III: 6.8{\%}; type IV 10.6{\%}; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3{\%}, type II: 3.0{\%}; type III: 3.2{\%}; type IV: 0{\%}; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0{\%}, type II: 10.1{\%}; type III: 14.3{\%}; type IV: 20.0{\%}; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1{\%} vs 10.6{\%}, p = 0.87). Conclusion: Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment.",
keywords = "NSQIP database, Surgical site infection, Vulvar surgery",
author = "I. Mert and Cliby, {William Arthur} and Bews, {K. A.} and Habermann, {E. B.} and Dowdy, {Sean Christopher}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based wound classification for vulvar surgery

T2 - Implications for risk adjustment

AU - Mert, I.

AU - Cliby, William Arthur

AU - Bews, K. A.

AU - Habermann, E. B.

AU - Dowdy, Sean Christopher

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification. Methods: Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed. Results: Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6%), 364 (17.2%), and 407 (19.2%) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4%; type II: 3.8%, type III: 6.8%; type IV 10.6%; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3%, type II: 3.0%; type III: 3.2%; type IV: 0%; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0%, type II: 10.1%; type III: 14.3%; type IV: 20.0%; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1% vs 10.6%, p = 0.87). Conclusion: Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment.

AB - Objectives: The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification. Methods: Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed. Results: Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6%), 364 (17.2%), and 407 (19.2%) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4%; type II: 3.8%, type III: 6.8%; type IV 10.6%; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3%, type II: 3.0%; type III: 3.2%; type IV: 0%; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0%, type II: 10.1%; type III: 14.3%; type IV: 20.0%; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1% vs 10.6%, p = 0.87). Conclusion: Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment.

KW - NSQIP database

KW - Surgical site infection

KW - Vulvar surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067680434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067680434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 31248667

AN - SCOPUS:85067680434

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

ER -