Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer

Ya Yu Tsai, Gloria M Petersen, Susan V. Booker, Judith A. Bacon, Stanley R. Hamilton, Francis M. Giardiello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Anecdotal reports of hereditary colorectal cancer suggest that genetic anticipation (earlier appearance in successive generations) occurs, but ascertainment bias and cohort effects confound this interpretation. Using approaches that correct for such biases, we examined the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer from family history questionnaires completed by subjects in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry; 475 parent-offspring pairs in 308 pedigrees were studied. We observed the expected cohort effect among offspring, in that the mean ages at diagnosis of those born before 1921, between 1921 and 1930, and after 1930 were 63 ± 13 (SD), 57 ± 10, and 42 ± 10 years, respectively, while their parents' mean ages were 65 ± 14, 66 ± 14, and 58 ± 15 years, respectively. In the cohort born before 1921, in which observation periods for both parents and offspring were comparable, there was no difference in age at diagnosis by pairwise comparison or life table analysis (P = 0.15 and 0.23, respectively; r = 0.32). Subgroup analysis of 67 pairs from 38 families that met the International Collaborative Group (ICG) criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and of 14 pairs from 7 families with known germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes also showed no significant differences (mean age at diagnosis: 56 ±14 years for parents and 57 ± 16 years for offspring from ICG families, and 45 ± 10 years for parents and 44 ± 12 years for offspring in families with known mutations). We also found no evidence for effect of parental gender on age at diagnosis in offspring of either gender, nor a secular trend toward younger onset colorectal cancer in this sample. In conclusion, there is no evidence for genetic anticipation or genomic imprinting of age at diagnosis in this sample of colorectal cancer families. Apparent anticipation appears to reflect a birth cohort bias of ascertainment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-446
Number of pages12
JournalGenetic Epidemiology
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetic Anticipation
Colorectal Neoplasms
Genomic Imprinting
Cohort Effect
Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Neoplasms
DNA Mismatch Repair
Life Tables
Germ-Line Mutation
Pedigree
Registries
Observation
Parturition
Mutation

Keywords

  • Age at diagnosis
  • Coloroctal cancer
  • Genomic imprinting
  • HNPCC
  • Replication error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer. / Tsai, Ya Yu; Petersen, Gloria M; Booker, Susan V.; Bacon, Judith A.; Hamilton, Stanley R.; Giardiello, Francis M.

In: Genetic Epidemiology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1997, p. 435-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsai, Ya Yu ; Petersen, Gloria M ; Booker, Susan V. ; Bacon, Judith A. ; Hamilton, Stanley R. ; Giardiello, Francis M. / Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer. In: Genetic Epidemiology. 1997 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 435-446.
@article{ed50ce8012b64cc68f9a05ef3988e4ca,
title = "Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer",
abstract = "Anecdotal reports of hereditary colorectal cancer suggest that genetic anticipation (earlier appearance in successive generations) occurs, but ascertainment bias and cohort effects confound this interpretation. Using approaches that correct for such biases, we examined the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer from family history questionnaires completed by subjects in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry; 475 parent-offspring pairs in 308 pedigrees were studied. We observed the expected cohort effect among offspring, in that the mean ages at diagnosis of those born before 1921, between 1921 and 1930, and after 1930 were 63 ± 13 (SD), 57 ± 10, and 42 ± 10 years, respectively, while their parents' mean ages were 65 ± 14, 66 ± 14, and 58 ± 15 years, respectively. In the cohort born before 1921, in which observation periods for both parents and offspring were comparable, there was no difference in age at diagnosis by pairwise comparison or life table analysis (P = 0.15 and 0.23, respectively; r = 0.32). Subgroup analysis of 67 pairs from 38 families that met the International Collaborative Group (ICG) criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and of 14 pairs from 7 families with known germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes also showed no significant differences (mean age at diagnosis: 56 ±14 years for parents and 57 ± 16 years for offspring from ICG families, and 45 ± 10 years for parents and 44 ± 12 years for offspring in families with known mutations). We also found no evidence for effect of parental gender on age at diagnosis in offspring of either gender, nor a secular trend toward younger onset colorectal cancer in this sample. In conclusion, there is no evidence for genetic anticipation or genomic imprinting of age at diagnosis in this sample of colorectal cancer families. Apparent anticipation appears to reflect a birth cohort bias of ascertainment.",
keywords = "Age at diagnosis, Coloroctal cancer, Genomic imprinting, HNPCC, Replication error",
author = "Tsai, {Ya Yu} and Petersen, {Gloria M} and Booker, {Susan V.} and Bacon, {Judith A.} and Hamilton, {Stanley R.} and Giardiello, {Francis M.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:4<435::AID-GEPI8>3.0.CO;2-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "435--446",
journal = "Genetic Epidemiology",
issn = "0741-0395",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer

AU - Tsai, Ya Yu

AU - Petersen, Gloria M

AU - Booker, Susan V.

AU - Bacon, Judith A.

AU - Hamilton, Stanley R.

AU - Giardiello, Francis M.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Anecdotal reports of hereditary colorectal cancer suggest that genetic anticipation (earlier appearance in successive generations) occurs, but ascertainment bias and cohort effects confound this interpretation. Using approaches that correct for such biases, we examined the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer from family history questionnaires completed by subjects in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry; 475 parent-offspring pairs in 308 pedigrees were studied. We observed the expected cohort effect among offspring, in that the mean ages at diagnosis of those born before 1921, between 1921 and 1930, and after 1930 were 63 ± 13 (SD), 57 ± 10, and 42 ± 10 years, respectively, while their parents' mean ages were 65 ± 14, 66 ± 14, and 58 ± 15 years, respectively. In the cohort born before 1921, in which observation periods for both parents and offspring were comparable, there was no difference in age at diagnosis by pairwise comparison or life table analysis (P = 0.15 and 0.23, respectively; r = 0.32). Subgroup analysis of 67 pairs from 38 families that met the International Collaborative Group (ICG) criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and of 14 pairs from 7 families with known germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes also showed no significant differences (mean age at diagnosis: 56 ±14 years for parents and 57 ± 16 years for offspring from ICG families, and 45 ± 10 years for parents and 44 ± 12 years for offspring in families with known mutations). We also found no evidence for effect of parental gender on age at diagnosis in offspring of either gender, nor a secular trend toward younger onset colorectal cancer in this sample. In conclusion, there is no evidence for genetic anticipation or genomic imprinting of age at diagnosis in this sample of colorectal cancer families. Apparent anticipation appears to reflect a birth cohort bias of ascertainment.

AB - Anecdotal reports of hereditary colorectal cancer suggest that genetic anticipation (earlier appearance in successive generations) occurs, but ascertainment bias and cohort effects confound this interpretation. Using approaches that correct for such biases, we examined the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer from family history questionnaires completed by subjects in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry; 475 parent-offspring pairs in 308 pedigrees were studied. We observed the expected cohort effect among offspring, in that the mean ages at diagnosis of those born before 1921, between 1921 and 1930, and after 1930 were 63 ± 13 (SD), 57 ± 10, and 42 ± 10 years, respectively, while their parents' mean ages were 65 ± 14, 66 ± 14, and 58 ± 15 years, respectively. In the cohort born before 1921, in which observation periods for both parents and offspring were comparable, there was no difference in age at diagnosis by pairwise comparison or life table analysis (P = 0.15 and 0.23, respectively; r = 0.32). Subgroup analysis of 67 pairs from 38 families that met the International Collaborative Group (ICG) criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and of 14 pairs from 7 families with known germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes also showed no significant differences (mean age at diagnosis: 56 ±14 years for parents and 57 ± 16 years for offspring from ICG families, and 45 ± 10 years for parents and 44 ± 12 years for offspring in families with known mutations). We also found no evidence for effect of parental gender on age at diagnosis in offspring of either gender, nor a secular trend toward younger onset colorectal cancer in this sample. In conclusion, there is no evidence for genetic anticipation or genomic imprinting of age at diagnosis in this sample of colorectal cancer families. Apparent anticipation appears to reflect a birth cohort bias of ascertainment.

KW - Age at diagnosis

KW - Coloroctal cancer

KW - Genomic imprinting

KW - HNPCC

KW - Replication error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030871703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030871703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:4<435::AID-GEPI8>3.0.CO;2-1

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:4<435::AID-GEPI8>3.0.CO;2-1

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 435

EP - 446

JO - Genetic Epidemiology

JF - Genetic Epidemiology

SN - 0741-0395

IS - 4

ER -