Evaluation of fat saturation technique for T2-weighted endorectal coil MRI of the prostate

Scott A. Mirowitz, Jay Heiken, Jeffrey J. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of fat suppression has been found to improve tissue contrast and artifact control for performance of body coil MR imaging of the pelvis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of fat suppression confers similar advantages when endorectal coil MR examinations are performed for staging of prostate cancer. Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with conventional T1-weighted (TR 600, TE 20) and conventional and fat saturation proton density-/T2-weighted (TR 2500, TE 35 80) sequences. Thirteen of 60 patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and constituted the study group for which conventional and fat suppressed long TR images were directly compared by three reviewers. Criteria assessed included the relative ability of each sequence to demonstrate zonal distinction, periprostatic venous plexus, fibromuscular stroma, capsule definition, seminal vesicle architecture, tumor conspicuity, capsular penetration and/or seminal vesicle tumor invasion, artifact control, and overall image quality. There was no statistically significant improvement in factors relating to image quality with use of fat saturation. In addition, depiction of the anatomic and pathologic features listed above was not significantly improved for fat-suppressed as compared with conventional endorectal coil images. It is concluded that fat saturation does not result in significant improvement over conventional T2-weighted images in endorectal MR imaging of the prostate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)743-747
Number of pages5
JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oils and fats
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prostate
Fats
Seminal Vesicles
Artifacts
Image quality
Tumors
Imaging techniques
Prostatectomy
Pelvis
Capsules
Protons
Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Tissue

Keywords

  • MR, comparative studies
  • MR, fat suppression
  • Prostate, MR
  • Prostate, neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Evaluation of fat saturation technique for T2-weighted endorectal coil MRI of the prostate. / Mirowitz, Scott A.; Heiken, Jay; Brown, Jeffrey J.

In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 12, No. 5, 01.01.1994, p. 743-747.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{236ef908dd464746a036779f603a266d,
title = "Evaluation of fat saturation technique for T2-weighted endorectal coil MRI of the prostate",
abstract = "The use of fat suppression has been found to improve tissue contrast and artifact control for performance of body coil MR imaging of the pelvis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of fat suppression confers similar advantages when endorectal coil MR examinations are performed for staging of prostate cancer. Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with conventional T1-weighted (TR 600, TE 20) and conventional and fat saturation proton density-/T2-weighted (TR 2500, TE 35 80) sequences. Thirteen of 60 patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and constituted the study group for which conventional and fat suppressed long TR images were directly compared by three reviewers. Criteria assessed included the relative ability of each sequence to demonstrate zonal distinction, periprostatic venous plexus, fibromuscular stroma, capsule definition, seminal vesicle architecture, tumor conspicuity, capsular penetration and/or seminal vesicle tumor invasion, artifact control, and overall image quality. There was no statistically significant improvement in factors relating to image quality with use of fat saturation. In addition, depiction of the anatomic and pathologic features listed above was not significantly improved for fat-suppressed as compared with conventional endorectal coil images. It is concluded that fat saturation does not result in significant improvement over conventional T2-weighted images in endorectal MR imaging of the prostate.",
keywords = "MR, comparative studies, MR, fat suppression, Prostate, MR, Prostate, neoplasms",
author = "Mirowitz, {Scott A.} and Jay Heiken and Brown, {Jeffrey J.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0730-725X(94)92199-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "743--747",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "0730-725X",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of fat saturation technique for T2-weighted endorectal coil MRI of the prostate

AU - Mirowitz, Scott A.

AU - Heiken, Jay

AU - Brown, Jeffrey J.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - The use of fat suppression has been found to improve tissue contrast and artifact control for performance of body coil MR imaging of the pelvis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of fat suppression confers similar advantages when endorectal coil MR examinations are performed for staging of prostate cancer. Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with conventional T1-weighted (TR 600, TE 20) and conventional and fat saturation proton density-/T2-weighted (TR 2500, TE 35 80) sequences. Thirteen of 60 patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and constituted the study group for which conventional and fat suppressed long TR images were directly compared by three reviewers. Criteria assessed included the relative ability of each sequence to demonstrate zonal distinction, periprostatic venous plexus, fibromuscular stroma, capsule definition, seminal vesicle architecture, tumor conspicuity, capsular penetration and/or seminal vesicle tumor invasion, artifact control, and overall image quality. There was no statistically significant improvement in factors relating to image quality with use of fat saturation. In addition, depiction of the anatomic and pathologic features listed above was not significantly improved for fat-suppressed as compared with conventional endorectal coil images. It is concluded that fat saturation does not result in significant improvement over conventional T2-weighted images in endorectal MR imaging of the prostate.

AB - The use of fat suppression has been found to improve tissue contrast and artifact control for performance of body coil MR imaging of the pelvis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of fat suppression confers similar advantages when endorectal coil MR examinations are performed for staging of prostate cancer. Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with conventional T1-weighted (TR 600, TE 20) and conventional and fat saturation proton density-/T2-weighted (TR 2500, TE 35 80) sequences. Thirteen of 60 patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and constituted the study group for which conventional and fat suppressed long TR images were directly compared by three reviewers. Criteria assessed included the relative ability of each sequence to demonstrate zonal distinction, periprostatic venous plexus, fibromuscular stroma, capsule definition, seminal vesicle architecture, tumor conspicuity, capsular penetration and/or seminal vesicle tumor invasion, artifact control, and overall image quality. There was no statistically significant improvement in factors relating to image quality with use of fat saturation. In addition, depiction of the anatomic and pathologic features listed above was not significantly improved for fat-suppressed as compared with conventional endorectal coil images. It is concluded that fat saturation does not result in significant improvement over conventional T2-weighted images in endorectal MR imaging of the prostate.

KW - MR, comparative studies

KW - MR, fat suppression

KW - Prostate, MR

KW - Prostate, neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028233360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028233360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0730-725X(94)92199-7

DO - 10.1016/0730-725X(94)92199-7

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 743

EP - 747

JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 0730-725X

IS - 5

ER -