Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state

Mary E. Charlton, Michelle A. Mengeling, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Nader M. Makki, Ashish Malhotra, J. Stacey Klutts, Barcey T. Levy, Peter J. Kaboli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Distance from health care facilities can be a barrier to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially for colonoscopy. Alternatively, an improved at-home stool-based screening tool, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), requires only a single sample and has a better sensitivity-specificity balance compared to traditional guaiac fecal occult blood tests. Our objective was to determine if FITs mailed to asymptomatic, average-risk patients overdue for screening resulted in higher screening rates versus mailing educational materials alone or no intervention (ie, usual care). Methods: Veterans ages 51-64, asymptomatic, at average risk for CRC, overdue for screening and in a veterans administration (VA) catchment area covering a large rural population were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) education only (Ed) group: mailed CRC educational materials and a survey of screening history and preferences (N = 499); (2) FIT group: mailed the FIT, plus educational materials and survey (N = 500); and (3) usual care (UC) group: received no mailings (N = 500). Findings: At 6 months postintervention, 21% of the FIT group had received CRC screening by any method compared to 6% of the Ed group (and 6% of the UC group) (P < .0001). Of the 105 respondents from the FIT group, 71 (68%) were eligible to take the FIT. Of those, 64 (90%) completed the FIT and 8 (12%) tested positive. Conclusions: This low-intensity intervention of mailing FITs to average risk patients overdue for screening resulted in a significantly higher screening rate than educational materials alone or usual care, and may be of particular interest in rural areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-332
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Guaiac
Occult Blood
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Health Facilities
Hematologic Tests
Veterans
Rural Population
Colonoscopy
History
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Access to care
  • Colorectal cancer screening
  • Fecal immunochemical test
  • Health services research
  • Program evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Charlton, M. E., Mengeling, M. A., Halfdanarson, T. R., Makki, N. M., Malhotra, A., Klutts, J. S., ... Kaboli, P. J. (2014). Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state. Journal of Rural Health, 30(3), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12052

Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state. / Charlton, Mary E.; Mengeling, Michelle A.; Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.; Makki, Nader M.; Malhotra, Ashish; Klutts, J. Stacey; Levy, Barcey T.; Kaboli, Peter J.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2014, p. 322-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Charlton, ME, Mengeling, MA, Halfdanarson, TR, Makki, NM, Malhotra, A, Klutts, JS, Levy, BT & Kaboli, PJ 2014, 'Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state', Journal of Rural Health, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12052
Charlton ME, Mengeling MA, Halfdanarson TR, Makki NM, Malhotra A, Klutts JS et al. Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state. Journal of Rural Health. 2014;30(3):322-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12052
Charlton, Mary E. ; Mengeling, Michelle A. ; Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R. ; Makki, Nader M. ; Malhotra, Ashish ; Klutts, J. Stacey ; Levy, Barcey T. ; Kaboli, Peter J. / Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 322-332.
@article{64a15a81091c409ca1489b1424913b00,
title = "Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state",
abstract = "Purpose: Distance from health care facilities can be a barrier to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially for colonoscopy. Alternatively, an improved at-home stool-based screening tool, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), requires only a single sample and has a better sensitivity-specificity balance compared to traditional guaiac fecal occult blood tests. Our objective was to determine if FITs mailed to asymptomatic, average-risk patients overdue for screening resulted in higher screening rates versus mailing educational materials alone or no intervention (ie, usual care). Methods: Veterans ages 51-64, asymptomatic, at average risk for CRC, overdue for screening and in a veterans administration (VA) catchment area covering a large rural population were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) education only (Ed) group: mailed CRC educational materials and a survey of screening history and preferences (N = 499); (2) FIT group: mailed the FIT, plus educational materials and survey (N = 500); and (3) usual care (UC) group: received no mailings (N = 500). Findings: At 6 months postintervention, 21{\%} of the FIT group had received CRC screening by any method compared to 6{\%} of the Ed group (and 6{\%} of the UC group) (P < .0001). Of the 105 respondents from the FIT group, 71 (68{\%}) were eligible to take the FIT. Of those, 64 (90{\%}) completed the FIT and 8 (12{\%}) tested positive. Conclusions: This low-intensity intervention of mailing FITs to average risk patients overdue for screening resulted in a significantly higher screening rate than educational materials alone or usual care, and may be of particular interest in rural areas.",
keywords = "Access to care, Colorectal cancer screening, Fecal immunochemical test, Health services research, Program evaluation",
author = "Charlton, {Mary E.} and Mengeling, {Michelle A.} and Halfdanarson, {Thorvardur R.} and Makki, {Nader M.} and Ashish Malhotra and Klutts, {J. Stacey} and Levy, {Barcey T.} and Kaboli, {Peter J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/jrh.12052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "322--332",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state

AU - Charlton, Mary E.

AU - Mengeling, Michelle A.

AU - Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.

AU - Makki, Nader M.

AU - Malhotra, Ashish

AU - Klutts, J. Stacey

AU - Levy, Barcey T.

AU - Kaboli, Peter J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: Distance from health care facilities can be a barrier to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially for colonoscopy. Alternatively, an improved at-home stool-based screening tool, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), requires only a single sample and has a better sensitivity-specificity balance compared to traditional guaiac fecal occult blood tests. Our objective was to determine if FITs mailed to asymptomatic, average-risk patients overdue for screening resulted in higher screening rates versus mailing educational materials alone or no intervention (ie, usual care). Methods: Veterans ages 51-64, asymptomatic, at average risk for CRC, overdue for screening and in a veterans administration (VA) catchment area covering a large rural population were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) education only (Ed) group: mailed CRC educational materials and a survey of screening history and preferences (N = 499); (2) FIT group: mailed the FIT, plus educational materials and survey (N = 500); and (3) usual care (UC) group: received no mailings (N = 500). Findings: At 6 months postintervention, 21% of the FIT group had received CRC screening by any method compared to 6% of the Ed group (and 6% of the UC group) (P < .0001). Of the 105 respondents from the FIT group, 71 (68%) were eligible to take the FIT. Of those, 64 (90%) completed the FIT and 8 (12%) tested positive. Conclusions: This low-intensity intervention of mailing FITs to average risk patients overdue for screening resulted in a significantly higher screening rate than educational materials alone or usual care, and may be of particular interest in rural areas.

AB - Purpose: Distance from health care facilities can be a barrier to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially for colonoscopy. Alternatively, an improved at-home stool-based screening tool, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), requires only a single sample and has a better sensitivity-specificity balance compared to traditional guaiac fecal occult blood tests. Our objective was to determine if FITs mailed to asymptomatic, average-risk patients overdue for screening resulted in higher screening rates versus mailing educational materials alone or no intervention (ie, usual care). Methods: Veterans ages 51-64, asymptomatic, at average risk for CRC, overdue for screening and in a veterans administration (VA) catchment area covering a large rural population were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) education only (Ed) group: mailed CRC educational materials and a survey of screening history and preferences (N = 499); (2) FIT group: mailed the FIT, plus educational materials and survey (N = 500); and (3) usual care (UC) group: received no mailings (N = 500). Findings: At 6 months postintervention, 21% of the FIT group had received CRC screening by any method compared to 6% of the Ed group (and 6% of the UC group) (P < .0001). Of the 105 respondents from the FIT group, 71 (68%) were eligible to take the FIT. Of those, 64 (90%) completed the FIT and 8 (12%) tested positive. Conclusions: This low-intensity intervention of mailing FITs to average risk patients overdue for screening resulted in a significantly higher screening rate than educational materials alone or usual care, and may be of particular interest in rural areas.

KW - Access to care

KW - Colorectal cancer screening

KW - Fecal immunochemical test

KW - Health services research

KW - Program evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903649346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903649346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jrh.12052

DO - 10.1111/jrh.12052

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 322

EP - 332

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 3

ER -