Evaluating sex and gender competencies in the medical curriculum: A case study

Virginia M Miller, Priscilla M. Flynn, Keith D. Lindor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Sex and gender differences exist in the manifestation and prevalence of many conditions and diseases. Yet many clinician training programs neglect to integrate this information across their curricula. Objective: This study aimed to measure the sex and gender medical knowledge of medical students enrolled in a program without an explicit directive to integrate sex and gender differences across a block system of core subjects. Methods: A forced-choice instrument consisting of 35 multiple-choice and true or false questions was adapted from an evaluation tool used in the European Curriculum in Gender Medicine held at Charité Hospital, Berlin, in September 2010. Results: Fourth-year (response rate 93%) and second-year (response rate 70%) students enrolled in Mayo Medical School completed the instrument. More than 50% of students in both classes indicated that topics related to sex and gender were covered in gynecology, cardiology, and pediatrics, and <20% of students indicated inclusion of such topics in nephrology, neurology, and orthopedics. More than twice as many second-year students indicated that topics dealing with sex and gender were included in immunology course material compared with fourth-year students. A consensus of written comments indicated that concepts of sex and gender-based medicine need to be embedded into existing curriculum, with an emphasis on clinically relevant information. Conclusions: Although this study represents only one medical school in the United States, information regarding sex and gender aspects of medicine is not consistently included in this curriculum without an explicit directive. These results can provide guidance for curriculum improvement to train future physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGender Medicine
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Students
curriculum
gender
Medicine
Medical Schools
Sex Characteristics
medicine
student
gender-specific factors
Nephrology
neurology
Berlin
Neurology
gynecology
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Gynecology
Medical Students
Orthopedics

Keywords

  • curriculum
  • gender differences
  • Mayo Clinic
  • medical licensing
  • sex differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Gender Studies

Cite this

Evaluating sex and gender competencies in the medical curriculum : A case study. / Miller, Virginia M; Flynn, Priscilla M.; Lindor, Keith D.

In: Gender Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 3, 06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5cd4d529e56649738937174e09a96643,
title = "Evaluating sex and gender competencies in the medical curriculum: A case study",
abstract = "Background: Sex and gender differences exist in the manifestation and prevalence of many conditions and diseases. Yet many clinician training programs neglect to integrate this information across their curricula. Objective: This study aimed to measure the sex and gender medical knowledge of medical students enrolled in a program without an explicit directive to integrate sex and gender differences across a block system of core subjects. Methods: A forced-choice instrument consisting of 35 multiple-choice and true or false questions was adapted from an evaluation tool used in the European Curriculum in Gender Medicine held at Charit{\'e} Hospital, Berlin, in September 2010. Results: Fourth-year (response rate 93{\%}) and second-year (response rate 70{\%}) students enrolled in Mayo Medical School completed the instrument. More than 50{\%} of students in both classes indicated that topics related to sex and gender were covered in gynecology, cardiology, and pediatrics, and <20{\%} of students indicated inclusion of such topics in nephrology, neurology, and orthopedics. More than twice as many second-year students indicated that topics dealing with sex and gender were included in immunology course material compared with fourth-year students. A consensus of written comments indicated that concepts of sex and gender-based medicine need to be embedded into existing curriculum, with an emphasis on clinically relevant information. Conclusions: Although this study represents only one medical school in the United States, information regarding sex and gender aspects of medicine is not consistently included in this curriculum without an explicit directive. These results can provide guidance for curriculum improvement to train future physicians.",
keywords = "curriculum, gender differences, Mayo Clinic, medical licensing, sex differences",
author = "Miller, {Virginia M} and Flynn, {Priscilla M.} and Lindor, {Keith D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.genm.2012.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Gender Medicine",
issn = "1550-8579",
publisher = "Excerpta Medica",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating sex and gender competencies in the medical curriculum

T2 - A case study

AU - Miller, Virginia M

AU - Flynn, Priscilla M.

AU - Lindor, Keith D.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Background: Sex and gender differences exist in the manifestation and prevalence of many conditions and diseases. Yet many clinician training programs neglect to integrate this information across their curricula. Objective: This study aimed to measure the sex and gender medical knowledge of medical students enrolled in a program without an explicit directive to integrate sex and gender differences across a block system of core subjects. Methods: A forced-choice instrument consisting of 35 multiple-choice and true or false questions was adapted from an evaluation tool used in the European Curriculum in Gender Medicine held at Charité Hospital, Berlin, in September 2010. Results: Fourth-year (response rate 93%) and second-year (response rate 70%) students enrolled in Mayo Medical School completed the instrument. More than 50% of students in both classes indicated that topics related to sex and gender were covered in gynecology, cardiology, and pediatrics, and <20% of students indicated inclusion of such topics in nephrology, neurology, and orthopedics. More than twice as many second-year students indicated that topics dealing with sex and gender were included in immunology course material compared with fourth-year students. A consensus of written comments indicated that concepts of sex and gender-based medicine need to be embedded into existing curriculum, with an emphasis on clinically relevant information. Conclusions: Although this study represents only one medical school in the United States, information regarding sex and gender aspects of medicine is not consistently included in this curriculum without an explicit directive. These results can provide guidance for curriculum improvement to train future physicians.

AB - Background: Sex and gender differences exist in the manifestation and prevalence of many conditions and diseases. Yet many clinician training programs neglect to integrate this information across their curricula. Objective: This study aimed to measure the sex and gender medical knowledge of medical students enrolled in a program without an explicit directive to integrate sex and gender differences across a block system of core subjects. Methods: A forced-choice instrument consisting of 35 multiple-choice and true or false questions was adapted from an evaluation tool used in the European Curriculum in Gender Medicine held at Charité Hospital, Berlin, in September 2010. Results: Fourth-year (response rate 93%) and second-year (response rate 70%) students enrolled in Mayo Medical School completed the instrument. More than 50% of students in both classes indicated that topics related to sex and gender were covered in gynecology, cardiology, and pediatrics, and <20% of students indicated inclusion of such topics in nephrology, neurology, and orthopedics. More than twice as many second-year students indicated that topics dealing with sex and gender were included in immunology course material compared with fourth-year students. A consensus of written comments indicated that concepts of sex and gender-based medicine need to be embedded into existing curriculum, with an emphasis on clinically relevant information. Conclusions: Although this study represents only one medical school in the United States, information regarding sex and gender aspects of medicine is not consistently included in this curriculum without an explicit directive. These results can provide guidance for curriculum improvement to train future physicians.

KW - curriculum

KW - gender differences

KW - Mayo Clinic

KW - medical licensing

KW - sex differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862170403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862170403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.genm.2012.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.genm.2012.01.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 22304976

AN - SCOPUS:84862170403

VL - 9

JO - Gender Medicine

JF - Gender Medicine

SN - 1550-8579

IS - 3

ER -