Evaluating eukaryotic secreted protein prediction

Eric W. Klee, Lynda B.M. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Improvements in protein sequence annotation and an increase in the number of annotated protein databases has fueled development of an increasing number of software tools to predict secreted proteins. Six software programs capable of high throughput and employing a wide range of prediction methods, SignalP 3.0, SignalP 2.0, TargetP 1.01, PrediSi, Phobius, and ProtComp 6.0, are evaluated. Results: Prediction accuracies were evaluated using 372 unbiased, eukaryotic, SwissProt protein sequences. TargetP, SignalP 3.0 maximum S-score and SignalP 3.0 D-score were the most accurate single scores (90-91% accurate). The combination of a positive TargetP prediction, SignalP 2.0 maximum Y-score, and SignalP 3.0 maximum S-score increased accuracy by six percent. Conclusions: Single predictive scores could be highly accurate, but almost all accuracies were slightly less than those reported by program authors. Predictive accuracy could be substantially improved by combining scores from multiple methods into a single composite prediction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number256
JournalBMC bioinformatics
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 14 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Structural Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating eukaryotic secreted protein prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this