EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses

Cyrus Piraka, Raj J. Shah, Norio Fukami, Krishnavel V. Chathadi, Yang K. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic role of EUS is evolving. We report our experience with EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of various intra-abdominal fluid collections. Objective: To determine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of EUS-guided drainage. Design: Prospective case series. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients referred for endoscopic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections; pancreatic pseudocysts amenable to conventional transgastric or transduodenal drainage were excluded. Interventions: Single-step EUS-guided drainage of fluid collections by using a therapeutic linear-array echoendoscope with fluoroscopic guidance. Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success, relief of symptoms, and procedural complications. Results: Nine consecutive patients deemed appropriate for EUS-guided drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections included transesophageal drainage of pseudocysts (n = 2), transgastric drainage of biloma (n = 2) and upper intra-abdominal abscesses (n = 2), transcolonic drainage of diverticular abscess (n = 1), Crohn's abscess (n = 1), and postoperative hematoma (n = 1). Endoscopic drainage was successful in all patients. Confirmation of complete resolution of the target fluid collection and symptom relief was achieved in 8 (89%) of 9 patients. Pneumothorax and mediastinitis developed in 1 patient after transesophageal drainage, which resolved with chest tube and medical therapy. During multiple stent placement, one of the stents was fully deployed into the abscess cavity in 2 patients; both were successfully retrieved either endoscopically (Crohn's abscess) or at the time of primary colonic resection (diverticular abscess). Limitation: Limited number of patients. Conclusions: EUS-guided transenteric drainage of bilomas, hematomas, abscesses, and inflammatory fluid collections is technically feasible and generally results in complete drainage and symptom relief. Procedural complications may be minimized with more experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)786-792
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abscess
Drainage
Hematoma
Stents
Abdominal Abscess
Pancreatic Pseudocyst
Mediastinitis
Chest Tubes
Pneumothorax
Tertiary Care Centers
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses. / Piraka, Cyrus; Shah, Raj J.; Fukami, Norio; Chathadi, Krishnavel V.; Chen, Yang K.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 70, No. 4, 01.10.2009, p. 786-792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Piraka, Cyrus ; Shah, Raj J. ; Fukami, Norio ; Chathadi, Krishnavel V. ; Chen, Yang K. / EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009 ; Vol. 70, No. 4. pp. 786-792.
@article{8becf879812d4a4aaf99a8d55b15ae57,
title = "EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses",
abstract = "Background: The therapeutic role of EUS is evolving. We report our experience with EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of various intra-abdominal fluid collections. Objective: To determine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of EUS-guided drainage. Design: Prospective case series. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients referred for endoscopic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections; pancreatic pseudocysts amenable to conventional transgastric or transduodenal drainage were excluded. Interventions: Single-step EUS-guided drainage of fluid collections by using a therapeutic linear-array echoendoscope with fluoroscopic guidance. Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success, relief of symptoms, and procedural complications. Results: Nine consecutive patients deemed appropriate for EUS-guided drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections included transesophageal drainage of pseudocysts (n = 2), transgastric drainage of biloma (n = 2) and upper intra-abdominal abscesses (n = 2), transcolonic drainage of diverticular abscess (n = 1), Crohn's abscess (n = 1), and postoperative hematoma (n = 1). Endoscopic drainage was successful in all patients. Confirmation of complete resolution of the target fluid collection and symptom relief was achieved in 8 (89{\%}) of 9 patients. Pneumothorax and mediastinitis developed in 1 patient after transesophageal drainage, which resolved with chest tube and medical therapy. During multiple stent placement, one of the stents was fully deployed into the abscess cavity in 2 patients; both were successfully retrieved either endoscopically (Crohn's abscess) or at the time of primary colonic resection (diverticular abscess). Limitation: Limited number of patients. Conclusions: EUS-guided transenteric drainage of bilomas, hematomas, abscesses, and inflammatory fluid collections is technically feasible and generally results in complete drainage and symptom relief. Procedural complications may be minimized with more experience.",
author = "Cyrus Piraka and Shah, {Raj J.} and Norio Fukami and Chathadi, {Krishnavel V.} and Chen, {Yang K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "786--792",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses

AU - Piraka, Cyrus

AU - Shah, Raj J.

AU - Fukami, Norio

AU - Chathadi, Krishnavel V.

AU - Chen, Yang K.

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - Background: The therapeutic role of EUS is evolving. We report our experience with EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of various intra-abdominal fluid collections. Objective: To determine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of EUS-guided drainage. Design: Prospective case series. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients referred for endoscopic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections; pancreatic pseudocysts amenable to conventional transgastric or transduodenal drainage were excluded. Interventions: Single-step EUS-guided drainage of fluid collections by using a therapeutic linear-array echoendoscope with fluoroscopic guidance. Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success, relief of symptoms, and procedural complications. Results: Nine consecutive patients deemed appropriate for EUS-guided drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections included transesophageal drainage of pseudocysts (n = 2), transgastric drainage of biloma (n = 2) and upper intra-abdominal abscesses (n = 2), transcolonic drainage of diverticular abscess (n = 1), Crohn's abscess (n = 1), and postoperative hematoma (n = 1). Endoscopic drainage was successful in all patients. Confirmation of complete resolution of the target fluid collection and symptom relief was achieved in 8 (89%) of 9 patients. Pneumothorax and mediastinitis developed in 1 patient after transesophageal drainage, which resolved with chest tube and medical therapy. During multiple stent placement, one of the stents was fully deployed into the abscess cavity in 2 patients; both were successfully retrieved either endoscopically (Crohn's abscess) or at the time of primary colonic resection (diverticular abscess). Limitation: Limited number of patients. Conclusions: EUS-guided transenteric drainage of bilomas, hematomas, abscesses, and inflammatory fluid collections is technically feasible and generally results in complete drainage and symptom relief. Procedural complications may be minimized with more experience.

AB - Background: The therapeutic role of EUS is evolving. We report our experience with EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of various intra-abdominal fluid collections. Objective: To determine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of EUS-guided drainage. Design: Prospective case series. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients referred for endoscopic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections; pancreatic pseudocysts amenable to conventional transgastric or transduodenal drainage were excluded. Interventions: Single-step EUS-guided drainage of fluid collections by using a therapeutic linear-array echoendoscope with fluoroscopic guidance. Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success, relief of symptoms, and procedural complications. Results: Nine consecutive patients deemed appropriate for EUS-guided drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections included transesophageal drainage of pseudocysts (n = 2), transgastric drainage of biloma (n = 2) and upper intra-abdominal abscesses (n = 2), transcolonic drainage of diverticular abscess (n = 1), Crohn's abscess (n = 1), and postoperative hematoma (n = 1). Endoscopic drainage was successful in all patients. Confirmation of complete resolution of the target fluid collection and symptom relief was achieved in 8 (89%) of 9 patients. Pneumothorax and mediastinitis developed in 1 patient after transesophageal drainage, which resolved with chest tube and medical therapy. During multiple stent placement, one of the stents was fully deployed into the abscess cavity in 2 patients; both were successfully retrieved either endoscopically (Crohn's abscess) or at the time of primary colonic resection (diverticular abscess). Limitation: Limited number of patients. Conclusions: EUS-guided transenteric drainage of bilomas, hematomas, abscesses, and inflammatory fluid collections is technically feasible and generally results in complete drainage and symptom relief. Procedural complications may be minimized with more experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349466685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349466685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.049

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.049

M3 - Article

C2 - 19577742

AN - SCOPUS:70349466685

VL - 70

SP - 786

EP - 792

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -