Ethical Tensions Resulting from Interpreter Involvement in the Consent Process

Amelia Barwise, Richard Sharp, Jessica Hirsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe how our institution responded when an interpreter who participated in the consent process involving an individual with limited English proficiency refused to cosign consent documents attesting that the individual enrolling in the study understood the consent information and that her consent to enroll was voluntary. In developing our approach, our institution took into account ethical tensions between the Belmont principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice that apply to the protection of research participants and the professional principles of beneficence, fidelity, and respect for the importance of culture that are outlined in ethical guidelines for medical interpreters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-35
Number of pages5
JournalEthics & human research
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Beneficence
Consent Forms
Social Justice
Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • human subjects research
  • informed consent
  • limited English proficiency
  • medical interpreters
  • translation

Cite this

Ethical Tensions Resulting from Interpreter Involvement in the Consent Process. / Barwise, Amelia; Sharp, Richard; Hirsch, Jessica.

In: Ethics & human research, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 31-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{335cb96f115343168ee284265cc127ff,
title = "Ethical Tensions Resulting from Interpreter Involvement in the Consent Process",
abstract = "We describe how our institution responded when an interpreter who participated in the consent process involving an individual with limited English proficiency refused to cosign consent documents attesting that the individual enrolling in the study understood the consent information and that her consent to enroll was voluntary. In developing our approach, our institution took into account ethical tensions between the Belmont principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice that apply to the protection of research participants and the professional principles of beneficence, fidelity, and respect for the importance of culture that are outlined in ethical guidelines for medical interpreters.",
keywords = "human subjects research, informed consent, limited English proficiency, medical interpreters, translation",
author = "Amelia Barwise and Richard Sharp and Jessica Hirsch",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eahr.500025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "31--35",
journal = "Ethics & human research",
issn = "2578-2363",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical Tensions Resulting from Interpreter Involvement in the Consent Process

AU - Barwise, Amelia

AU - Sharp, Richard

AU - Hirsch, Jessica

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - We describe how our institution responded when an interpreter who participated in the consent process involving an individual with limited English proficiency refused to cosign consent documents attesting that the individual enrolling in the study understood the consent information and that her consent to enroll was voluntary. In developing our approach, our institution took into account ethical tensions between the Belmont principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice that apply to the protection of research participants and the professional principles of beneficence, fidelity, and respect for the importance of culture that are outlined in ethical guidelines for medical interpreters.

AB - We describe how our institution responded when an interpreter who participated in the consent process involving an individual with limited English proficiency refused to cosign consent documents attesting that the individual enrolling in the study understood the consent information and that her consent to enroll was voluntary. In developing our approach, our institution took into account ethical tensions between the Belmont principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice that apply to the protection of research participants and the professional principles of beneficence, fidelity, and respect for the importance of culture that are outlined in ethical guidelines for medical interpreters.

KW - human subjects research

KW - informed consent

KW - limited English proficiency

KW - medical interpreters

KW - translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070473254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070473254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eahr.500025

DO - 10.1002/eahr.500025

M3 - Article

C2 - 31336041

AN - SCOPUS:85070473254

VL - 41

SP - 31

EP - 35

JO - Ethics & human research

JF - Ethics & human research

SN - 2578-2363

IS - 4

ER -