Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs

Matthew DeCamp, Daniel Pomerantz, Kamala Cotts, Elizabeth Dzeng, Neil Farber, Lisa Lehmann, P. Preston Reynolds, Lois Snyder Sulmasy, Jon C Tilburt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spurred on by recent health care reforms and the Triple Aim’s goals of improving population health outcomes, reducing health care costs, and improving the patient experience of care, emphasis on population health is increasing throughout medicine. Population health has the potential to improve patient care and health outcomes for individual patients. However, specific population health activities may not be in every patient’s best interest in every circumstance, which can create ethical tensions for individual physicians and other health care professionals. Because individual medical professionals remain committed primarily to the best interests of individual patients, physicians have a unique role to play in ensuring population health supports this ethical obligation. Using widely recognized principles of medical ethics—nonmaleficence/beneficence, respect for persons, and justice—this article describes the ethical issues that may arise in contemporary population health programs and how to manage them. Attending to these principles will improve the design and implementation of population health programs and help maintain trust in the medical profession.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 18 2017

Fingerprint

Population Control
Ethics
Health
Population
Patient Care
Beneficence
Physicians
Health Care Reform
Health Care Costs
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs. / DeCamp, Matthew; Pomerantz, Daniel; Cotts, Kamala; Dzeng, Elizabeth; Farber, Neil; Lehmann, Lisa; Reynolds, P. Preston; Sulmasy, Lois Snyder; Tilburt, Jon C.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18.12.2017, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeCamp, M, Pomerantz, D, Cotts, K, Dzeng, E, Farber, N, Lehmann, L, Reynolds, PP, Sulmasy, LS & Tilburt, JC 2017, 'Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs', Journal of General Internal Medicine, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4234-4
DeCamp, Matthew ; Pomerantz, Daniel ; Cotts, Kamala ; Dzeng, Elizabeth ; Farber, Neil ; Lehmann, Lisa ; Reynolds, P. Preston ; Sulmasy, Lois Snyder ; Tilburt, Jon C. / Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2017 ; pp. 1-6.
@article{d3cda9d38cac4e1dae7e3e88d487343a,
title = "Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs",
abstract = "Spurred on by recent health care reforms and the Triple Aim’s goals of improving population health outcomes, reducing health care costs, and improving the patient experience of care, emphasis on population health is increasing throughout medicine. Population health has the potential to improve patient care and health outcomes for individual patients. However, specific population health activities may not be in every patient’s best interest in every circumstance, which can create ethical tensions for individual physicians and other health care professionals. Because individual medical professionals remain committed primarily to the best interests of individual patients, physicians have a unique role to play in ensuring population health supports this ethical obligation. Using widely recognized principles of medical ethics—nonmaleficence/beneficence, respect for persons, and justice—this article describes the ethical issues that may arise in contemporary population health programs and how to manage them. Attending to these principles will improve the design and implementation of population health programs and help maintain trust in the medical profession.",
author = "Matthew DeCamp and Daniel Pomerantz and Kamala Cotts and Elizabeth Dzeng and Neil Farber and Lisa Lehmann and Reynolds, {P. Preston} and Sulmasy, {Lois Snyder} and Tilburt, {Jon C}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-017-4234-4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs

AU - DeCamp, Matthew

AU - Pomerantz, Daniel

AU - Cotts, Kamala

AU - Dzeng, Elizabeth

AU - Farber, Neil

AU - Lehmann, Lisa

AU - Reynolds, P. Preston

AU - Sulmasy, Lois Snyder

AU - Tilburt, Jon C

PY - 2017/12/18

Y1 - 2017/12/18

N2 - Spurred on by recent health care reforms and the Triple Aim’s goals of improving population health outcomes, reducing health care costs, and improving the patient experience of care, emphasis on population health is increasing throughout medicine. Population health has the potential to improve patient care and health outcomes for individual patients. However, specific population health activities may not be in every patient’s best interest in every circumstance, which can create ethical tensions for individual physicians and other health care professionals. Because individual medical professionals remain committed primarily to the best interests of individual patients, physicians have a unique role to play in ensuring population health supports this ethical obligation. Using widely recognized principles of medical ethics—nonmaleficence/beneficence, respect for persons, and justice—this article describes the ethical issues that may arise in contemporary population health programs and how to manage them. Attending to these principles will improve the design and implementation of population health programs and help maintain trust in the medical profession.

AB - Spurred on by recent health care reforms and the Triple Aim’s goals of improving population health outcomes, reducing health care costs, and improving the patient experience of care, emphasis on population health is increasing throughout medicine. Population health has the potential to improve patient care and health outcomes for individual patients. However, specific population health activities may not be in every patient’s best interest in every circumstance, which can create ethical tensions for individual physicians and other health care professionals. Because individual medical professionals remain committed primarily to the best interests of individual patients, physicians have a unique role to play in ensuring population health supports this ethical obligation. Using widely recognized principles of medical ethics—nonmaleficence/beneficence, respect for persons, and justice—this article describes the ethical issues that may arise in contemporary population health programs and how to manage them. Attending to these principles will improve the design and implementation of population health programs and help maintain trust in the medical profession.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038349142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038349142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-017-4234-4

DO - 10.1007/s11606-017-4234-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 29256088

AN - SCOPUS:85038349142

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

ER -