Ethical considerations of maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for anomalies

Kirsten A. Riggan, Christopher A. Collura, Siobhan T. Pittock, Rodrigo Ruano, Kevin J. Whitford, Megan Allyse

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence suggests prenatal fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) may improve the survival and long-term morbidity of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, yet little guidance exists in the medical literature as to the ethical permissibility of performing a maternal–fetal surgical intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality. Case: Here, we present a case of a twin pregnancy with an unaffected twin (Twin A) and a twin diagnosed with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Twin B). A proposed fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) procedure may improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of Twin B; however, balloon placement may also initiate very preterm birth at 28 weeks of gestation. The Fetal Ethics Advisory Board was asked to provide guidance on the permissibility of FETO in this pregnancy. Discussion: A literature review identified one brief mention of FETO in a 34-week dichorionic twin pregnancy in the medical literature, which resulted in the rupture of fetal membranes in the sac of the nonsurgical twin. Only one paper specifically addressed the question of whether it would be ethically permissible to subject a healthy twin to the risks of maternal–fetal surgery for the benefit of a compromised twin, finding that any risk to the unaffected twin would be an ethical contraindication. We offer our own analysis of moral weight and risk/benefit considerations of this proposed intervention, and present our findings on the circumstances in which it may be ethically permissible to perform a maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy. Conclusion: While FETO was not ethically advisable in this pregnancy, we find that in limited circumstances, certain maternal–fetal surgical interventions may be ethically permissible in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality if the risks to the unaffected twin are minimal and the procedure would improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of a critically compromised co-twin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Twin Pregnancy
Pregnancy
Extraembryonic Membranes
Premature Birth
Ethics
Rupture
Healthy Volunteers
Newborn Infant
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • ethics
  • fetal surgery
  • twin pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Ethical considerations of maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for anomalies. / Riggan, Kirsten A.; Collura, Christopher A.; Pittock, Siobhan T.; Ruano, Rodrigo; Whitford, Kevin J.; Allyse, Megan.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5a7327da740d4cd287cd5f7f785fc229,
title = "Ethical considerations of maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for anomalies",
abstract = "Background: Recent evidence suggests prenatal fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) may improve the survival and long-term morbidity of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, yet little guidance exists in the medical literature as to the ethical permissibility of performing a maternal–fetal surgical intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality. Case: Here, we present a case of a twin pregnancy with an unaffected twin (Twin A) and a twin diagnosed with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Twin B). A proposed fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) procedure may improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of Twin B; however, balloon placement may also initiate very preterm birth at 28 weeks of gestation. The Fetal Ethics Advisory Board was asked to provide guidance on the permissibility of FETO in this pregnancy. Discussion: A literature review identified one brief mention of FETO in a 34-week dichorionic twin pregnancy in the medical literature, which resulted in the rupture of fetal membranes in the sac of the nonsurgical twin. Only one paper specifically addressed the question of whether it would be ethically permissible to subject a healthy twin to the risks of maternal–fetal surgery for the benefit of a compromised twin, finding that any risk to the unaffected twin would be an ethical contraindication. We offer our own analysis of moral weight and risk/benefit considerations of this proposed intervention, and present our findings on the circumstances in which it may be ethically permissible to perform a maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy. Conclusion: While FETO was not ethically advisable in this pregnancy, we find that in limited circumstances, certain maternal–fetal surgical interventions may be ethically permissible in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality if the risks to the unaffected twin are minimal and the procedure would improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of a critically compromised co-twin.",
keywords = "Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, ethics, fetal surgery, twin pregnancy",
author = "Riggan, {Kirsten A.} and Collura, {Christopher A.} and Pittock, {Siobhan T.} and Rodrigo Ruano and Whitford, {Kevin J.} and Megan Allyse",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14767058.2019.1631793",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical considerations of maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for anomalies

AU - Riggan, Kirsten A.

AU - Collura, Christopher A.

AU - Pittock, Siobhan T.

AU - Ruano, Rodrigo

AU - Whitford, Kevin J.

AU - Allyse, Megan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Recent evidence suggests prenatal fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) may improve the survival and long-term morbidity of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, yet little guidance exists in the medical literature as to the ethical permissibility of performing a maternal–fetal surgical intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality. Case: Here, we present a case of a twin pregnancy with an unaffected twin (Twin A) and a twin diagnosed with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Twin B). A proposed fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) procedure may improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of Twin B; however, balloon placement may also initiate very preterm birth at 28 weeks of gestation. The Fetal Ethics Advisory Board was asked to provide guidance on the permissibility of FETO in this pregnancy. Discussion: A literature review identified one brief mention of FETO in a 34-week dichorionic twin pregnancy in the medical literature, which resulted in the rupture of fetal membranes in the sac of the nonsurgical twin. Only one paper specifically addressed the question of whether it would be ethically permissible to subject a healthy twin to the risks of maternal–fetal surgery for the benefit of a compromised twin, finding that any risk to the unaffected twin would be an ethical contraindication. We offer our own analysis of moral weight and risk/benefit considerations of this proposed intervention, and present our findings on the circumstances in which it may be ethically permissible to perform a maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy. Conclusion: While FETO was not ethically advisable in this pregnancy, we find that in limited circumstances, certain maternal–fetal surgical interventions may be ethically permissible in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality if the risks to the unaffected twin are minimal and the procedure would improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of a critically compromised co-twin.

AB - Background: Recent evidence suggests prenatal fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) may improve the survival and long-term morbidity of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, yet little guidance exists in the medical literature as to the ethical permissibility of performing a maternal–fetal surgical intervention in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality. Case: Here, we present a case of a twin pregnancy with an unaffected twin (Twin A) and a twin diagnosed with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Twin B). A proposed fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) procedure may improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of Twin B; however, balloon placement may also initiate very preterm birth at 28 weeks of gestation. The Fetal Ethics Advisory Board was asked to provide guidance on the permissibility of FETO in this pregnancy. Discussion: A literature review identified one brief mention of FETO in a 34-week dichorionic twin pregnancy in the medical literature, which resulted in the rupture of fetal membranes in the sac of the nonsurgical twin. Only one paper specifically addressed the question of whether it would be ethically permissible to subject a healthy twin to the risks of maternal–fetal surgery for the benefit of a compromised twin, finding that any risk to the unaffected twin would be an ethical contraindication. We offer our own analysis of moral weight and risk/benefit considerations of this proposed intervention, and present our findings on the circumstances in which it may be ethically permissible to perform a maternal–fetal intervention in a twin pregnancy. Conclusion: While FETO was not ethically advisable in this pregnancy, we find that in limited circumstances, certain maternal–fetal surgical interventions may be ethically permissible in a twin pregnancy discordant for a structural abnormality if the risks to the unaffected twin are minimal and the procedure would improve the likelihood of survival and postnatal outcome of a critically compromised co-twin.

KW - Congenital diaphragmatic hernia

KW - ethics

KW - fetal surgery

KW - twin pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068155777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068155777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2019.1631793

DO - 10.1080/14767058.2019.1631793

M3 - Review article

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

ER -