Ethical challenges with hemodialysis patients who lack decision-making capacity: Behavioral issues, surrogate decision-makers, and end-of-life situations

Molly A. Feely, Robert C. Albright, Bjoerg (Bjorg) Thorsteinsdottir, Alvin H. Moss, Keith M. Swetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) is routinely offered to patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States who are ineligible for other renal replacement modalities. The frequency of HD among the US population is greater than all other countries, except Taiwan and Japan. In US, patients are often dialyzed irrespective of age, comorbidities, prognosis, or decision-making capacity. Determination of when patients can no longer dialyze is variable and can be dialysis-center specific. Determinants may be related to progressive comorbidities and frailty, mobility or access issues, patient self-determination, or an inability to tolerate the treatment safely for any number of reasons (e.g., hypotension, behavioral issues). Behavioral issues may impact the safety of not only patients themselves, but also those around them. In this article the authors present the case of an elderly patient on HD with progressive cognitive impairment and combative behavior placing him and others at risk of physical harm. The authors discuss the medical, ethical, legal, and psychosocial challenges to care of such patients who lack decision-making capacity with a focus on variable approaches by regions and culture. This manuscript provides recommendations and highlights resources to assist nephrologists, dialysis personnel, ethics consultants, and palliative medicine teams in managing such patients to resolve conflict.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-480
Number of pages6
JournalKidney International
Volume86
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Renal Dialysis
Decision Making
Comorbidity
Dialysis
Ethicists
Personal Autonomy
Taiwan
Hypotension
Chronic Kidney Failure
Patient Care
Japan
Kidney
Safety
Population

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • decision-making capacity
  • end-of-life care
  • ethics
  • hemodialysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Ethical challenges with hemodialysis patients who lack decision-making capacity : Behavioral issues, surrogate decision-makers, and end-of-life situations. / Feely, Molly A.; Albright, Robert C.; Thorsteinsdottir, Bjoerg (Bjorg); Moss, Alvin H.; Swetz, Keith M.

In: Kidney International, Vol. 86, No. 3, 2014, p. 475-480.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3c2da9e4c254a4a97dd346de77f0578,
title = "Ethical challenges with hemodialysis patients who lack decision-making capacity: Behavioral issues, surrogate decision-makers, and end-of-life situations",
abstract = "Hemodialysis (HD) is routinely offered to patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States who are ineligible for other renal replacement modalities. The frequency of HD among the US population is greater than all other countries, except Taiwan and Japan. In US, patients are often dialyzed irrespective of age, comorbidities, prognosis, or decision-making capacity. Determination of when patients can no longer dialyze is variable and can be dialysis-center specific. Determinants may be related to progressive comorbidities and frailty, mobility or access issues, patient self-determination, or an inability to tolerate the treatment safely for any number of reasons (e.g., hypotension, behavioral issues). Behavioral issues may impact the safety of not only patients themselves, but also those around them. In this article the authors present the case of an elderly patient on HD with progressive cognitive impairment and combative behavior placing him and others at risk of physical harm. The authors discuss the medical, ethical, legal, and psychosocial challenges to care of such patients who lack decision-making capacity with a focus on variable approaches by regions and culture. This manuscript provides recommendations and highlights resources to assist nephrologists, dialysis personnel, ethics consultants, and palliative medicine teams in managing such patients to resolve conflict.",
keywords = "autonomy, decision-making capacity, end-of-life care, ethics, hemodialysis",
author = "Feely, {Molly A.} and Albright, {Robert C.} and Thorsteinsdottir, {Bjoerg (Bjorg)} and Moss, {Alvin H.} and Swetz, {Keith M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1038/ki.2014.231",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "475--480",
journal = "Kidney International",
issn = "0085-2538",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical challenges with hemodialysis patients who lack decision-making capacity

T2 - Behavioral issues, surrogate decision-makers, and end-of-life situations

AU - Feely, Molly A.

AU - Albright, Robert C.

AU - Thorsteinsdottir, Bjoerg (Bjorg)

AU - Moss, Alvin H.

AU - Swetz, Keith M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Hemodialysis (HD) is routinely offered to patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States who are ineligible for other renal replacement modalities. The frequency of HD among the US population is greater than all other countries, except Taiwan and Japan. In US, patients are often dialyzed irrespective of age, comorbidities, prognosis, or decision-making capacity. Determination of when patients can no longer dialyze is variable and can be dialysis-center specific. Determinants may be related to progressive comorbidities and frailty, mobility or access issues, patient self-determination, or an inability to tolerate the treatment safely for any number of reasons (e.g., hypotension, behavioral issues). Behavioral issues may impact the safety of not only patients themselves, but also those around them. In this article the authors present the case of an elderly patient on HD with progressive cognitive impairment and combative behavior placing him and others at risk of physical harm. The authors discuss the medical, ethical, legal, and psychosocial challenges to care of such patients who lack decision-making capacity with a focus on variable approaches by regions and culture. This manuscript provides recommendations and highlights resources to assist nephrologists, dialysis personnel, ethics consultants, and palliative medicine teams in managing such patients to resolve conflict.

AB - Hemodialysis (HD) is routinely offered to patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States who are ineligible for other renal replacement modalities. The frequency of HD among the US population is greater than all other countries, except Taiwan and Japan. In US, patients are often dialyzed irrespective of age, comorbidities, prognosis, or decision-making capacity. Determination of when patients can no longer dialyze is variable and can be dialysis-center specific. Determinants may be related to progressive comorbidities and frailty, mobility or access issues, patient self-determination, or an inability to tolerate the treatment safely for any number of reasons (e.g., hypotension, behavioral issues). Behavioral issues may impact the safety of not only patients themselves, but also those around them. In this article the authors present the case of an elderly patient on HD with progressive cognitive impairment and combative behavior placing him and others at risk of physical harm. The authors discuss the medical, ethical, legal, and psychosocial challenges to care of such patients who lack decision-making capacity with a focus on variable approaches by regions and culture. This manuscript provides recommendations and highlights resources to assist nephrologists, dialysis personnel, ethics consultants, and palliative medicine teams in managing such patients to resolve conflict.

KW - autonomy

KW - decision-making capacity

KW - end-of-life care

KW - ethics

KW - hemodialysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907598038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907598038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ki.2014.231

DO - 10.1038/ki.2014.231

M3 - Article

C2 - 24988063

AN - SCOPUS:84907598038

VL - 86

SP - 475

EP - 480

JO - Kidney International

JF - Kidney International

SN - 0085-2538

IS - 3

ER -