Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support

Paul Mueller, Keith M. Swetz, Monica R. Freeman, Kari A. Carter, Mary Eliot Crowley, Cathy J. Anderson Severson, Soon J. Park, Daniel P. Sulmasy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a series of patients with heart failure supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and the legal and ethical aspects pertaining to these requests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from March 1, 2003, through January 31, 2009, who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and for whom the requests were fulfilled. We then explored the legal and ethical permissibility of carrying out such requests. RESULTS: The median age of the 14 patients identified (13 men, 1 woman) was 57 years. Requests were made by 2 patients and 12 surrogates. None of the patients' available advance directives mentioned the VAD. For 11 patients, multidisciplinary care conferences were held before withdrawal of VAD support. Only 1 patient had an ethics consultation. All 14 patients died within 1 day of withdrawal of VAD support. CONCLUSION: Patients have the right to refuse or request the withdrawal of any unwanted treatment, and we argue that this right extends to VAD support. We also argue that the cause of death in these cases is the underlying heart disease, not assisted suicide or euthanasia. Therefore, patients with heart failure supported with VADs or their surrogates may request withdrawal of this treatment. In our view, carrying out such requests is permissible in accordance with the principles that apply to withdrawing other life-sustaining treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)791-797
Number of pages7
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume85
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Ethical Analysis
Heart-Assist Devices
Ethics Consultation
Heart Failure
Assisted Suicide
Advance Directives
Euthanasia
Patient Rights
Jurisprudence
Medical Records
Cause of Death
Heart Diseases
Patient Care
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mueller, P., Swetz, K. M., Freeman, M. R., Carter, K. A., Crowley, M. E., Anderson Severson, C. J., ... Sulmasy, D. P. (2010). Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 85(9), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0113

Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. / Mueller, Paul; Swetz, Keith M.; Freeman, Monica R.; Carter, Kari A.; Crowley, Mary Eliot; Anderson Severson, Cathy J.; Park, Soon J.; Sulmasy, Daniel P.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 85, No. 9, 2010, p. 791-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mueller, P, Swetz, KM, Freeman, MR, Carter, KA, Crowley, ME, Anderson Severson, CJ, Park, SJ & Sulmasy, DP 2010, 'Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support', Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 791-797. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0113
Mueller P, Swetz KM, Freeman MR, Carter KA, Crowley ME, Anderson Severson CJ et al. Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2010;85(9):791-797. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0113
Mueller, Paul ; Swetz, Keith M. ; Freeman, Monica R. ; Carter, Kari A. ; Crowley, Mary Eliot ; Anderson Severson, Cathy J. ; Park, Soon J. ; Sulmasy, Daniel P. / Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 9. pp. 791-797.
@article{6ec635b61c444817980afca3e9831017,
title = "Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To describe a series of patients with heart failure supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and the legal and ethical aspects pertaining to these requests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from March 1, 2003, through January 31, 2009, who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and for whom the requests were fulfilled. We then explored the legal and ethical permissibility of carrying out such requests. RESULTS: The median age of the 14 patients identified (13 men, 1 woman) was 57 years. Requests were made by 2 patients and 12 surrogates. None of the patients' available advance directives mentioned the VAD. For 11 patients, multidisciplinary care conferences were held before withdrawal of VAD support. Only 1 patient had an ethics consultation. All 14 patients died within 1 day of withdrawal of VAD support. CONCLUSION: Patients have the right to refuse or request the withdrawal of any unwanted treatment, and we argue that this right extends to VAD support. We also argue that the cause of death in these cases is the underlying heart disease, not assisted suicide or euthanasia. Therefore, patients with heart failure supported with VADs or their surrogates may request withdrawal of this treatment. In our view, carrying out such requests is permissible in accordance with the principles that apply to withdrawing other life-sustaining treatments.",
author = "Paul Mueller and Swetz, {Keith M.} and Freeman, {Monica R.} and Carter, {Kari A.} and Crowley, {Mary Eliot} and {Anderson Severson}, {Cathy J.} and Park, {Soon J.} and Sulmasy, {Daniel P.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.4065/mcp.2010.0113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "791--797",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support

AU - Mueller, Paul

AU - Swetz, Keith M.

AU - Freeman, Monica R.

AU - Carter, Kari A.

AU - Crowley, Mary Eliot

AU - Anderson Severson, Cathy J.

AU - Park, Soon J.

AU - Sulmasy, Daniel P.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To describe a series of patients with heart failure supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and the legal and ethical aspects pertaining to these requests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from March 1, 2003, through January 31, 2009, who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and for whom the requests were fulfilled. We then explored the legal and ethical permissibility of carrying out such requests. RESULTS: The median age of the 14 patients identified (13 men, 1 woman) was 57 years. Requests were made by 2 patients and 12 surrogates. None of the patients' available advance directives mentioned the VAD. For 11 patients, multidisciplinary care conferences were held before withdrawal of VAD support. Only 1 patient had an ethics consultation. All 14 patients died within 1 day of withdrawal of VAD support. CONCLUSION: Patients have the right to refuse or request the withdrawal of any unwanted treatment, and we argue that this right extends to VAD support. We also argue that the cause of death in these cases is the underlying heart disease, not assisted suicide or euthanasia. Therefore, patients with heart failure supported with VADs or their surrogates may request withdrawal of this treatment. In our view, carrying out such requests is permissible in accordance with the principles that apply to withdrawing other life-sustaining treatments.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To describe a series of patients with heart failure supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and the legal and ethical aspects pertaining to these requests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from March 1, 2003, through January 31, 2009, who requested (or whose surrogates requested) withdrawal of VAD support and for whom the requests were fulfilled. We then explored the legal and ethical permissibility of carrying out such requests. RESULTS: The median age of the 14 patients identified (13 men, 1 woman) was 57 years. Requests were made by 2 patients and 12 surrogates. None of the patients' available advance directives mentioned the VAD. For 11 patients, multidisciplinary care conferences were held before withdrawal of VAD support. Only 1 patient had an ethics consultation. All 14 patients died within 1 day of withdrawal of VAD support. CONCLUSION: Patients have the right to refuse or request the withdrawal of any unwanted treatment, and we argue that this right extends to VAD support. We also argue that the cause of death in these cases is the underlying heart disease, not assisted suicide or euthanasia. Therefore, patients with heart failure supported with VADs or their surrogates may request withdrawal of this treatment. In our view, carrying out such requests is permissible in accordance with the principles that apply to withdrawing other life-sustaining treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956368211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956368211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4065/mcp.2010.0113

DO - 10.4065/mcp.2010.0113

M3 - Article

C2 - 20584919

AN - SCOPUS:77956368211

VL - 85

SP - 791

EP - 797

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 9

ER -