Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis

Rui Qin, Marita G. Titler, Leah L. Shever, Taikyoung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Lack of randomization of nursing intervention in outcome effectiveness studies may lead to imbalanced covariates. Consequently, estimation of nursing intervention effect can be biased as in other observational studies. Propensity score analysis is an effective statistical method to reduce such bias and further derive causal effects in observational studies. Objectives: The objective of this study was to illustrate the use of propensity score analysis in quantitative nursing research through an example of pain management effect on length of hospital stay. Methods: Propensity scores are generated through a regression model treating the nursing intervention as the dependent variable and all confounding covariates as predictor variables. Then, propensity scores are used to adjust for this non-randomized assignment of nursing intervention through three approaches: regression covariance adjustment, stratification, and matching in the predictive outcome model for nursing intervention. Results: Propensity score analysis reduces the confounding covariates into a single variable of propensity score. After stratification and matching on propensity scores, observed covariates between nursing intervention groups are more balanced within each stratum or in the matched samples. The likelihood of receiving pain management is accounted for in the outcome model through the propensity scores. Both regression covariance adjustment and matching methods report a significant pain management effect on length of hospital stay in this example. The pain management effect can be regarded as causal when the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption holds. Discussion: Propensity score analysis provides an alternative statistical approach to the classical multivariate regression, stratification, and matching techniques for examining the effects of nursing intervention with a large number of confounding covariates in the background. It can be used to derive causal effects of nursing intervention in observational studies under certain circumstances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)444-452
Number of pages9
JournalNursing Research
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Nursing
Pain Management
Length of Stay
Nursing Models
Observational Studies
Nursing Research
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Random Allocation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Matching
  • Nursing effectiveness research
  • Nursing interventions
  • Propensity score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis. / Qin, Rui; Titler, Marita G.; Shever, Leah L.; Kim, Taikyoung.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 57, No. 6, 11.2008, p. 444-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Qin, Rui ; Titler, Marita G. ; Shever, Leah L. ; Kim, Taikyoung. / Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis. In: Nursing Research. 2008 ; Vol. 57, No. 6. pp. 444-452.
@article{54c031e0ffab49e2bd1637cef0a897fb,
title = "Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis",
abstract = "Background: Lack of randomization of nursing intervention in outcome effectiveness studies may lead to imbalanced covariates. Consequently, estimation of nursing intervention effect can be biased as in other observational studies. Propensity score analysis is an effective statistical method to reduce such bias and further derive causal effects in observational studies. Objectives: The objective of this study was to illustrate the use of propensity score analysis in quantitative nursing research through an example of pain management effect on length of hospital stay. Methods: Propensity scores are generated through a regression model treating the nursing intervention as the dependent variable and all confounding covariates as predictor variables. Then, propensity scores are used to adjust for this non-randomized assignment of nursing intervention through three approaches: regression covariance adjustment, stratification, and matching in the predictive outcome model for nursing intervention. Results: Propensity score analysis reduces the confounding covariates into a single variable of propensity score. After stratification and matching on propensity scores, observed covariates between nursing intervention groups are more balanced within each stratum or in the matched samples. The likelihood of receiving pain management is accounted for in the outcome model through the propensity scores. Both regression covariance adjustment and matching methods report a significant pain management effect on length of hospital stay in this example. The pain management effect can be regarded as causal when the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption holds. Discussion: Propensity score analysis provides an alternative statistical approach to the classical multivariate regression, stratification, and matching techniques for examining the effects of nursing intervention with a large number of confounding covariates in the background. It can be used to derive causal effects of nursing intervention in observational studies under certain circumstances.",
keywords = "Matching, Nursing effectiveness research, Nursing interventions, Propensity score",
author = "Rui Qin and Titler, {Marita G.} and Shever, {Leah L.} and Taikyoung Kim",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "444--452",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis

AU - Qin, Rui

AU - Titler, Marita G.

AU - Shever, Leah L.

AU - Kim, Taikyoung

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Background: Lack of randomization of nursing intervention in outcome effectiveness studies may lead to imbalanced covariates. Consequently, estimation of nursing intervention effect can be biased as in other observational studies. Propensity score analysis is an effective statistical method to reduce such bias and further derive causal effects in observational studies. Objectives: The objective of this study was to illustrate the use of propensity score analysis in quantitative nursing research through an example of pain management effect on length of hospital stay. Methods: Propensity scores are generated through a regression model treating the nursing intervention as the dependent variable and all confounding covariates as predictor variables. Then, propensity scores are used to adjust for this non-randomized assignment of nursing intervention through three approaches: regression covariance adjustment, stratification, and matching in the predictive outcome model for nursing intervention. Results: Propensity score analysis reduces the confounding covariates into a single variable of propensity score. After stratification and matching on propensity scores, observed covariates between nursing intervention groups are more balanced within each stratum or in the matched samples. The likelihood of receiving pain management is accounted for in the outcome model through the propensity scores. Both regression covariance adjustment and matching methods report a significant pain management effect on length of hospital stay in this example. The pain management effect can be regarded as causal when the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption holds. Discussion: Propensity score analysis provides an alternative statistical approach to the classical multivariate regression, stratification, and matching techniques for examining the effects of nursing intervention with a large number of confounding covariates in the background. It can be used to derive causal effects of nursing intervention in observational studies under certain circumstances.

AB - Background: Lack of randomization of nursing intervention in outcome effectiveness studies may lead to imbalanced covariates. Consequently, estimation of nursing intervention effect can be biased as in other observational studies. Propensity score analysis is an effective statistical method to reduce such bias and further derive causal effects in observational studies. Objectives: The objective of this study was to illustrate the use of propensity score analysis in quantitative nursing research through an example of pain management effect on length of hospital stay. Methods: Propensity scores are generated through a regression model treating the nursing intervention as the dependent variable and all confounding covariates as predictor variables. Then, propensity scores are used to adjust for this non-randomized assignment of nursing intervention through three approaches: regression covariance adjustment, stratification, and matching in the predictive outcome model for nursing intervention. Results: Propensity score analysis reduces the confounding covariates into a single variable of propensity score. After stratification and matching on propensity scores, observed covariates between nursing intervention groups are more balanced within each stratum or in the matched samples. The likelihood of receiving pain management is accounted for in the outcome model through the propensity scores. Both regression covariance adjustment and matching methods report a significant pain management effect on length of hospital stay in this example. The pain management effect can be regarded as causal when the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption holds. Discussion: Propensity score analysis provides an alternative statistical approach to the classical multivariate regression, stratification, and matching techniques for examining the effects of nursing intervention with a large number of confounding covariates in the background. It can be used to derive causal effects of nursing intervention in observational studies under certain circumstances.

KW - Matching

KW - Nursing effectiveness research

KW - Nursing interventions

KW - Propensity score

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57849091839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57849091839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6

DO - 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 444

EP - 452

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 6

ER -