TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishment of a Pediatric Ovarian and Testicular Cryopreservation Program for Malignant and Non-Malignant Conditions
T2 - The Mayo Clinic Experience
AU - Joshi, Vidhu B.
AU - Behl, Supriya
AU - Pittock, Siobhan T.
AU - Arndt, Carola A.S.
AU - Zhao, Yulian
AU - Khan, Zaraq
AU - Granberg, Candace F.
AU - Chattha, Asma
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all members of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Pediatric Endocrinology, Pediatric Surgery, Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and the In Vitro Fertilization Lab at Mayo Clinic Rochester for their ongoing support in the success of this program including Julia H. Byrne, Adriana M. Delgado, Jolene R. Fredrickson, Terri M. Galanits, Dr. Patricio C. Gargollo, M.D. Anthony G. Krenik, Kari L. Lampat, Hannah Lechner, and Dr. D. Dean Potter, M.D. Study data were recorded and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture system 62. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Study Objectives: To describe the structure of a pediatric fertility preservation (FP) program and to share safety and patient satisfaction data. Design: The FP program operates under prospective research protocols approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB). Setting: The FP program is a multidisciplinary effort between pediatric gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, pediatric urology, pediatric surgery, and laboratory medicine. Participants: The FP program enrolls patients between 0-17 years of age who have been diagnosed with a fertility-threatening condition and/or are scheduled to undergo gonadotoxic treatment. Interventions: FP is offered in the form of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) and testicular (TTC) tissue cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measures: The outcome measures are the safety of the procedure and results of patient surveys conducted by phone using a standard list of questions to assess attitudes towards FP. Results: To date, we have enrolled 38 OTC and 37 TTC patients. The median age (range) of OTC and TTC patients was 11 years (0.83-17 years) and 10 years (0.92-17 years) at the time of enrollment, respectively. Childhood cancers currently represent 88% of the fertility-threatening diagnoses. Meanwhile, patients with non-malignant conditions include those with gender dysphoria, aplastic anemia, and Turner's syndrome. To date, no serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported following surgery. According to n = 34 one-year follow-ups, 100% of parents felt that FP was a good decision. Conclusion: Consistent with the literature, our data suggests FP is safe and improves the quality of care provided to pediatric patients for their fertility-threatening diagnoses and/or treatments. Trial Registration: NCT02872532, NCT02646384.
AB - Study Objectives: To describe the structure of a pediatric fertility preservation (FP) program and to share safety and patient satisfaction data. Design: The FP program operates under prospective research protocols approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB). Setting: The FP program is a multidisciplinary effort between pediatric gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, pediatric urology, pediatric surgery, and laboratory medicine. Participants: The FP program enrolls patients between 0-17 years of age who have been diagnosed with a fertility-threatening condition and/or are scheduled to undergo gonadotoxic treatment. Interventions: FP is offered in the form of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) and testicular (TTC) tissue cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measures: The outcome measures are the safety of the procedure and results of patient surveys conducted by phone using a standard list of questions to assess attitudes towards FP. Results: To date, we have enrolled 38 OTC and 37 TTC patients. The median age (range) of OTC and TTC patients was 11 years (0.83-17 years) and 10 years (0.92-17 years) at the time of enrollment, respectively. Childhood cancers currently represent 88% of the fertility-threatening diagnoses. Meanwhile, patients with non-malignant conditions include those with gender dysphoria, aplastic anemia, and Turner's syndrome. To date, no serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported following surgery. According to n = 34 one-year follow-ups, 100% of parents felt that FP was a good decision. Conclusion: Consistent with the literature, our data suggests FP is safe and improves the quality of care provided to pediatric patients for their fertility-threatening diagnoses and/or treatments. Trial Registration: NCT02872532, NCT02646384.
KW - Cancer survivorship
KW - Childhood cancer
KW - Fertility preservation
KW - Infertility
KW - Oncofertility
KW - Transgender
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107411616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107411616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.04.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.04.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 33910089
AN - SCOPUS:85107411616
SN - 1083-3188
VL - 34
SP - 673
EP - 680
JO - Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
JF - Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
IS - 5
ER -