Establishing high-quality reference values for nerve conduction studies: A report from the normative data task force of the American Association Of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Timothy Dillingham, Shan Chen, Michael Andary, Ralph Buschbacher, David Del Toro, Benn Smith, Kuno Zimmermann, S. O. Yuen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: There are not uniform standards for nerve conduction testing across the United States. The objective of this study is to present a set of methodologically sound criteria to evaluate the literature for the purpose of identifying high-quality normative nerve conduction studies (NCS) suitable for widespread use. Methods: The Normative Data Task Force (NDTF) was formed to review published studies on methodological issues related to NCS. A set of criteria was then developed to evaluate the literature. These criteria and their rationale are described. Results: We identified 7 key issues that reflect high quality in NCS. For each issue, specific review criteria were developed. Conclusion: Rigorous criteria enable identification of high-quality studies dealing with nerve conduction reference values. This represents the first step toward the overarching goal of recommending NCS techniques and reference values for electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 54: 366–370, 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)366-370
Number of pages5
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Neural Conduction
Advisory Committees
Reference Values
Medicine
Muscles

Keywords

  • erve conduction
  • guidelines
  • nerve conduction studies
  • normal values
  • normative data
  • reference values
  • standards of practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Establishing high-quality reference values for nerve conduction studies : A report from the normative data task force of the American Association Of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. / Dillingham, Timothy; Chen, Shan; Andary, Michael; Buschbacher, Ralph; Del Toro, David; Smith, Benn; Zimmermann, Kuno; Yuen, S. O.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 366-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dillingham, Timothy ; Chen, Shan ; Andary, Michael ; Buschbacher, Ralph ; Del Toro, David ; Smith, Benn ; Zimmermann, Kuno ; Yuen, S. O. / Establishing high-quality reference values for nerve conduction studies : A report from the normative data task force of the American Association Of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. In: Muscle and Nerve. 2016 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 366-370.
@article{33e4e11ae3474ac9a3f303fd85f8731b,
title = "Establishing high-quality reference values for nerve conduction studies: A report from the normative data task force of the American Association Of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine",
abstract = "Introduction: There are not uniform standards for nerve conduction testing across the United States. The objective of this study is to present a set of methodologically sound criteria to evaluate the literature for the purpose of identifying high-quality normative nerve conduction studies (NCS) suitable for widespread use. Methods: The Normative Data Task Force (NDTF) was formed to review published studies on methodological issues related to NCS. A set of criteria was then developed to evaluate the literature. These criteria and their rationale are described. Results: We identified 7 key issues that reflect high quality in NCS. For each issue, specific review criteria were developed. Conclusion: Rigorous criteria enable identification of high-quality studies dealing with nerve conduction reference values. This represents the first step toward the overarching goal of recommending NCS techniques and reference values for electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 54: 366–370, 2016.",
keywords = "erve conduction, guidelines, nerve conduction studies, normal values, normative data, reference values, standards of practice",
author = "Timothy Dillingham and Shan Chen and Michael Andary and Ralph Buschbacher and {Del Toro}, David and Benn Smith and Kuno Zimmermann and Yuen, {S. O.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.25204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "366--370",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing high-quality reference values for nerve conduction studies

T2 - A report from the normative data task force of the American Association Of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

AU - Dillingham, Timothy

AU - Chen, Shan

AU - Andary, Michael

AU - Buschbacher, Ralph

AU - Del Toro, David

AU - Smith, Benn

AU - Zimmermann, Kuno

AU - Yuen, S. O.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Introduction: There are not uniform standards for nerve conduction testing across the United States. The objective of this study is to present a set of methodologically sound criteria to evaluate the literature for the purpose of identifying high-quality normative nerve conduction studies (NCS) suitable for widespread use. Methods: The Normative Data Task Force (NDTF) was formed to review published studies on methodological issues related to NCS. A set of criteria was then developed to evaluate the literature. These criteria and their rationale are described. Results: We identified 7 key issues that reflect high quality in NCS. For each issue, specific review criteria were developed. Conclusion: Rigorous criteria enable identification of high-quality studies dealing with nerve conduction reference values. This represents the first step toward the overarching goal of recommending NCS techniques and reference values for electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 54: 366–370, 2016.

AB - Introduction: There are not uniform standards for nerve conduction testing across the United States. The objective of this study is to present a set of methodologically sound criteria to evaluate the literature for the purpose of identifying high-quality normative nerve conduction studies (NCS) suitable for widespread use. Methods: The Normative Data Task Force (NDTF) was formed to review published studies on methodological issues related to NCS. A set of criteria was then developed to evaluate the literature. These criteria and their rationale are described. Results: We identified 7 key issues that reflect high quality in NCS. For each issue, specific review criteria were developed. Conclusion: Rigorous criteria enable identification of high-quality studies dealing with nerve conduction reference values. This represents the first step toward the overarching goal of recommending NCS techniques and reference values for electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 54: 366–370, 2016.

KW - erve conduction

KW - guidelines

KW - nerve conduction studies

KW - normal values

KW - normative data

KW - reference values

KW - standards of practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982094932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982094932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.25204

DO - 10.1002/mus.25204

M3 - Article

C2 - 27238858

AN - SCOPUS:84982094932

VL - 54

SP - 366

EP - 370

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 3

ER -