Abstract
Introduction: There are not uniform standards for nerve conduction testing across the United States. The objective of this study is to present a set of methodologically sound criteria to evaluate the literature for the purpose of identifying high-quality normative nerve conduction studies (NCS) suitable for widespread use. Methods: The Normative Data Task Force (NDTF) was formed to review published studies on methodological issues related to NCS. A set of criteria was then developed to evaluate the literature. These criteria and their rationale are described. Results: We identified 7 key issues that reflect high quality in NCS. For each issue, specific review criteria were developed. Conclusion: Rigorous criteria enable identification of high-quality studies dealing with nerve conduction reference values. This represents the first step toward the overarching goal of recommending NCS techniques and reference values for electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 54: 366–370, 2016.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 366-370 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Muscle and Nerve |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2016 |
Keywords
- erve conduction
- guidelines
- nerve conduction studies
- normal values
- normative data
- reference values
- standards of practice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physiology
- Clinical Neurology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Physiology (medical)