Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728))

A. J. Walter; A. N. Morse; R. A. Hammer; J. G. Hentz; J. F. Margina; J. L. Cornelia; P. M. Magtibay

Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728))

A. J. Walter, A. N. Morse, R. A. Hammer, J. G. Hentz, J. F. Margina, J. L. Cornelia, P. M. Magtibay

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1621
Number of pages	1
Journal	American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume	188
Issue number	6
State	Published - Jun 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Walter, A. J., Morse, A. N., Hammer, R. A., Hentz, J. G., Margina, J. F., Cornelia, J. L., & Magtibay, P. M. (2003). Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728)). American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 188(6), 1621.

Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728)). / Walter, A. J.; Morse, A. N.; Hammer, R. A. et al.
In: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, Vol. 188, No. 6, 01.06.2003, p. 1621.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Walter, AJ, Morse, AN, Hammer, RA, Hentz, JG, Margina, JF, Cornelia, JL & Magtibay, PM 2003, 'Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728))', American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1621.

@article{517d192af64f420b882dc2fd93d1cb23,

title = "Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728))",

author = "Walter, {A. J.} and Morse, {A. N.} and Hammer, {R. A.} and Hentz, {J. G.} and Margina, {J. F.} and Cornelia, {J. L.} and Magtibay, {P. M.}",

year = "2003",

month = jun,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "188",

pages = "1621",

journal = "American journal of obstetrics and gynecology",

issn = "0002-9378",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728))

AU - Walter, A. J.

AU - Morse, A. N.

AU - Hammer, R. A.

AU - Hentz, J. G.

AU - Margina, J. F.

AU - Cornelia, J. L.

AU - Magtibay, P. M.

PY - 2003/6/1

Y1 - 2003/6/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038000666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038000666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:0038000666

SN - 0002-9378

VL - 188

SP - 1621

JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

IS - 6

ER -

Erratum: Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) 186 (723-728))

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Cite this