Enteral stents

Shyam Varadarajulu, Subhas Banerjee, Bradley Barth, David Desilets, Vivek Kaul, Sripathi Kethu, Marcos Pedrosa, Patrick Pfau, Jeffrey Tokar, Amy Wang, Louis Michel Wong Kee Song, Sarah Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2010 for articles related to enteral, esophageal, duodenal, and colonic stents. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-464
Number of pages10
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Small Intestine
Stents
Technology
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publications
MEDLINE
Radiologic Health
Governing Board
Databases
Controlled Clinical Trials
Expert Testimony
Advisory Committees
United States Food and Drug Administration
Standard of Care
PubMed
Endoscopy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Varadarajulu, S., Banerjee, S., Barth, B., Desilets, D., Kaul, V., Kethu, S., ... Rodriguez, S. (2011). Enteral stents. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 74(3), 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.011

Enteral stents. / Varadarajulu, Shyam; Banerjee, Subhas; Barth, Bradley; Desilets, David; Kaul, Vivek; Kethu, Sripathi; Pedrosa, Marcos; Pfau, Patrick; Tokar, Jeffrey; Wang, Amy; Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel; Rodriguez, Sarah.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 74, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 455-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Varadarajulu, S, Banerjee, S, Barth, B, Desilets, D, Kaul, V, Kethu, S, Pedrosa, M, Pfau, P, Tokar, J, Wang, A, Wong Kee Song, LM & Rodriguez, S 2011, 'Enteral stents', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.011
Varadarajulu S, Banerjee S, Barth B, Desilets D, Kaul V, Kethu S et al. Enteral stents. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;74(3):455-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.011
Varadarajulu, Shyam ; Banerjee, Subhas ; Barth, Bradley ; Desilets, David ; Kaul, Vivek ; Kethu, Sripathi ; Pedrosa, Marcos ; Pfau, Patrick ; Tokar, Jeffrey ; Wang, Amy ; Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel ; Rodriguez, Sarah. / Enteral stents. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 ; Vol. 74, No. 3. pp. 455-464.
@article{f1222c860dc84b47a5e0b685cc188537,
title = "Enteral stents",
abstract = "The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the {"}related articles{"} feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2010 for articles related to enteral, esophageal, duodenal, and colonic stents. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.",
author = "Shyam Varadarajulu and Subhas Banerjee and Bradley Barth and David Desilets and Vivek Kaul and Sripathi Kethu and Marcos Pedrosa and Patrick Pfau and Jeffrey Tokar and Amy Wang and {Wong Kee Song}, {Louis Michel} and Sarah Rodriguez",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "455--464",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enteral stents

AU - Varadarajulu, Shyam

AU - Banerjee, Subhas

AU - Barth, Bradley

AU - Desilets, David

AU - Kaul, Vivek

AU - Kethu, Sripathi

AU - Pedrosa, Marcos

AU - Pfau, Patrick

AU - Tokar, Jeffrey

AU - Wang, Amy

AU - Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel

AU - Rodriguez, Sarah

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2010 for articles related to enteral, esophageal, duodenal, and colonic stents. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

AB - The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2010 for articles related to enteral, esophageal, duodenal, and colonic stents. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052271824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052271824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.011

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 455

EP - 464

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -