TY - JOUR
T1 - Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty
T2 - A comparison of three microscopy techniques
AU - Raecker, Matthew E.
AU - McLaren, Jay W.
AU - Kittleson, Katrina M.
AU - Patel, Sanjay V.
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Purpose: To determine corneal endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as recorded by three different microscopy techniques: noncontact specular microscopy, noncontact confocal microscopy, and contact confocal microscopy. Methods: The corneal endothelium of 52 eyes after DSEK and 20 normal eyes was photographed by the three microscopy techniques during a single encounter. Image quality was graded by two masked observers according to the proportion of countable contiguous cells visible in the image; disagreements in grading were adjudicated by a third observer. Endothelial cell density was compared among the three techniques. Results: After DSEK, image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal microscopy (P = 0.01) and better with noncontact confocal microscopy than with noncontact specular microscopy (P < 0.001). With noncontact specular microscopy, 42% of images after DSEK were uncountable. In normal corneas, all images were countable, and although image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal (P = 0.03) and noncontact specular (P < 0.001) microscopy, the difference was not clinically important. For countable images, the mean differences in endothelial cell density between microscopy methods were close to zero after DSEK and in normal corneas. Conclusions: Confocal optics enable better image quality of the corneal endothelium in corneas with high backscatter, such as those after DSEK. When images were countable, there was a good agreement for endothelial cell density measured by the three microscopy techniques.
AB - Purpose: To determine corneal endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as recorded by three different microscopy techniques: noncontact specular microscopy, noncontact confocal microscopy, and contact confocal microscopy. Methods: The corneal endothelium of 52 eyes after DSEK and 20 normal eyes was photographed by the three microscopy techniques during a single encounter. Image quality was graded by two masked observers according to the proportion of countable contiguous cells visible in the image; disagreements in grading were adjudicated by a third observer. Endothelial cell density was compared among the three techniques. Results: After DSEK, image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal microscopy (P = 0.01) and better with noncontact confocal microscopy than with noncontact specular microscopy (P < 0.001). With noncontact specular microscopy, 42% of images after DSEK were uncountable. In normal corneas, all images were countable, and although image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal (P = 0.03) and noncontact specular (P < 0.001) microscopy, the difference was not clinically important. For countable images, the mean differences in endothelial cell density between microscopy methods were close to zero after DSEK and in normal corneas. Conclusions: Confocal optics enable better image quality of the corneal endothelium in corneas with high backscatter, such as those after DSEK. When images were countable, there was a good agreement for endothelial cell density measured by the three microscopy techniques.
KW - Confocal microscopy
KW - DSEK
KW - Endothelium
KW - Image quality
KW - Specular microscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650827499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650827499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318203dc19
DO - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318203dc19
M3 - Article
C2 - 21178695
AN - SCOPUS:78650827499
SN - 1542-2321
VL - 37
SP - 6
EP - 10
JO - Eye and Contact Lens
JF - Eye and Contact Lens
IS - 1
ER -