Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: A comparison of three microscopy techniques

Matthew E. Raecker, Jay W. McLaren, Katrina M. Kittleson, Sanjay V. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine corneal endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as recorded by three different microscopy techniques: noncontact specular microscopy, noncontact confocal microscopy, and contact confocal microscopy. Methods: The corneal endothelium of 52 eyes after DSEK and 20 normal eyes was photographed by the three microscopy techniques during a single encounter. Image quality was graded by two masked observers according to the proportion of countable contiguous cells visible in the image; disagreements in grading were adjudicated by a third observer. Endothelial cell density was compared among the three techniques. Results: After DSEK, image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal microscopy (P = 0.01) and better with noncontact confocal microscopy than with noncontact specular microscopy (P < 0.001). With noncontact specular microscopy, 42% of images after DSEK were uncountable. In normal corneas, all images were countable, and although image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal (P = 0.03) and noncontact specular (P < 0.001) microscopy, the difference was not clinically important. For countable images, the mean differences in endothelial cell density between microscopy methods were close to zero after DSEK and in normal corneas. Conclusions: Confocal optics enable better image quality of the corneal endothelium in corneas with high backscatter, such as those after DSEK. When images were countable, there was a good agreement for endothelial cell density measured by the three microscopy techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-10
Number of pages5
JournalEye and Contact Lens
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
Microscopy
Confocal Microscopy
Cornea
Corneal Endothelium
Endothelial Cells
Cell Count

Keywords

  • Confocal microscopy
  • DSEK
  • Endothelium
  • Image quality
  • Specular microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty : A comparison of three microscopy techniques. / Raecker, Matthew E.; McLaren, Jay W.; Kittleson, Katrina M.; Patel, Sanjay V.

In: Eye and Contact Lens, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 6-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raecker, Matthew E. ; McLaren, Jay W. ; Kittleson, Katrina M. ; Patel, Sanjay V. / Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty : A comparison of three microscopy techniques. In: Eye and Contact Lens. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 6-10.
@article{ee648837d4674dc3bdc25bb28146321a,
title = "Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: A comparison of three microscopy techniques",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine corneal endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as recorded by three different microscopy techniques: noncontact specular microscopy, noncontact confocal microscopy, and contact confocal microscopy. Methods: The corneal endothelium of 52 eyes after DSEK and 20 normal eyes was photographed by the three microscopy techniques during a single encounter. Image quality was graded by two masked observers according to the proportion of countable contiguous cells visible in the image; disagreements in grading were adjudicated by a third observer. Endothelial cell density was compared among the three techniques. Results: After DSEK, image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal microscopy (P = 0.01) and better with noncontact confocal microscopy than with noncontact specular microscopy (P < 0.001). With noncontact specular microscopy, 42{\%} of images after DSEK were uncountable. In normal corneas, all images were countable, and although image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal (P = 0.03) and noncontact specular (P < 0.001) microscopy, the difference was not clinically important. For countable images, the mean differences in endothelial cell density between microscopy methods were close to zero after DSEK and in normal corneas. Conclusions: Confocal optics enable better image quality of the corneal endothelium in corneas with high backscatter, such as those after DSEK. When images were countable, there was a good agreement for endothelial cell density measured by the three microscopy techniques.",
keywords = "Confocal microscopy, DSEK, Endothelium, Image quality, Specular microscopy",
author = "Raecker, {Matthew E.} and McLaren, {Jay W.} and Kittleson, {Katrina M.} and Patel, {Sanjay V.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ICL.0b013e318203dc19",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "6--10",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lens",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty

T2 - A comparison of three microscopy techniques

AU - Raecker, Matthew E.

AU - McLaren, Jay W.

AU - Kittleson, Katrina M.

AU - Patel, Sanjay V.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine corneal endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as recorded by three different microscopy techniques: noncontact specular microscopy, noncontact confocal microscopy, and contact confocal microscopy. Methods: The corneal endothelium of 52 eyes after DSEK and 20 normal eyes was photographed by the three microscopy techniques during a single encounter. Image quality was graded by two masked observers according to the proportion of countable contiguous cells visible in the image; disagreements in grading were adjudicated by a third observer. Endothelial cell density was compared among the three techniques. Results: After DSEK, image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal microscopy (P = 0.01) and better with noncontact confocal microscopy than with noncontact specular microscopy (P < 0.001). With noncontact specular microscopy, 42% of images after DSEK were uncountable. In normal corneas, all images were countable, and although image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal (P = 0.03) and noncontact specular (P < 0.001) microscopy, the difference was not clinically important. For countable images, the mean differences in endothelial cell density between microscopy methods were close to zero after DSEK and in normal corneas. Conclusions: Confocal optics enable better image quality of the corneal endothelium in corneas with high backscatter, such as those after DSEK. When images were countable, there was a good agreement for endothelial cell density measured by the three microscopy techniques.

AB - Purpose: To determine corneal endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as recorded by three different microscopy techniques: noncontact specular microscopy, noncontact confocal microscopy, and contact confocal microscopy. Methods: The corneal endothelium of 52 eyes after DSEK and 20 normal eyes was photographed by the three microscopy techniques during a single encounter. Image quality was graded by two masked observers according to the proportion of countable contiguous cells visible in the image; disagreements in grading were adjudicated by a third observer. Endothelial cell density was compared among the three techniques. Results: After DSEK, image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal microscopy (P = 0.01) and better with noncontact confocal microscopy than with noncontact specular microscopy (P < 0.001). With noncontact specular microscopy, 42% of images after DSEK were uncountable. In normal corneas, all images were countable, and although image quality was better with contact confocal microscopy than with noncontact confocal (P = 0.03) and noncontact specular (P < 0.001) microscopy, the difference was not clinically important. For countable images, the mean differences in endothelial cell density between microscopy methods were close to zero after DSEK and in normal corneas. Conclusions: Confocal optics enable better image quality of the corneal endothelium in corneas with high backscatter, such as those after DSEK. When images were countable, there was a good agreement for endothelial cell density measured by the three microscopy techniques.

KW - Confocal microscopy

KW - DSEK

KW - Endothelium

KW - Image quality

KW - Specular microscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650827499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650827499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318203dc19

DO - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318203dc19

M3 - Article

C2 - 21178695

AN - SCOPUS:78650827499

VL - 37

SP - 6

EP - 10

JO - Eye and Contact Lens

JF - Eye and Contact Lens

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 1

ER -